I Spy With My Model's Eye: Visual Search as a Behavioural Test for MLLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19678v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:24:07 GMT
• Title: I Spy With My Model's Eye: Visual Search as a Behavioural Test for MLLMs
• Authors: John Burden, Jonathan Prunty, Ben Slater, Matthieu Tehenan, Greg Davis, Lucy Cheke,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet their visual processing is opaque.<n>We adapt classic visual search paradigms to test whether MLLMs exhibit the pop-out'' effect, where salient visual features are detected independently of distractor set size.<n>We find that advanced MLLMs exhibit human-like pop-out effects in colour or size-based disjunctive (single feature) search, as well as capacity limits for conjunctive (multiple feature) search.
• Score: 3.5266549480163047
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet their visual processing is opaque. Most black-box evaluations measure task accuracy, but reveal little about underlying mechanisms. Drawing on cognitive psychology, we adapt classic visual search paradigms -- originally developed to study human perception -- to test whether MLLMs exhibit the ``pop-out'' effect, where salient visual features are detected independently of distractor set size. Using controlled experiments targeting colour, size and lighting features, we find that advanced MLLMs exhibit human-like pop-out effects in colour or size-based disjunctive (single feature) search, as well as capacity limits for conjunctive (multiple feature) search. We also find evidence to suggest that MLLMs, like humans, incorporate natural scene priors such as lighting direction into object representations. We reinforce our findings using targeted fine-tuning and mechanistic interpretability analyses. Our work shows how visual search can serve as a cognitively grounded diagnostic tool for evaluating perceptual capabilities in MLLMs.

Related papers

• Unleashing the Intrinsic Visual Representation Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models [58.91911788912665]
  We propose Latent Visual Reconstruction (LaVer), a novel training framework that facilitates MLLMs in learning more discrimi visual representations.<n>Our method offers direct visual activation to MLLMs, which exhibit increased visual attention allocation, indicating enhanced utilization of visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-06T04:20:13Z)
• Multimodal LLM Augmented Reasoning for Interpretable Visual Perception Analysis [19.032828729570458]
  We use established principles and explanations from psychology and cognitive science related to complexity in human visual perception.<n>Our study aims to benchmark MLLMs across various explainability principles relevant to visual perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T22:14:27Z)
• Evaluating Graphical Perception with Multimodal LLMs [2.090547583226381]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have remarkably progressed in analyzing and understanding images.<n>For visualization, how do MLLMs perform when applied to graphical perception tasks?<n>Our study primarily evaluates fine-tuned and pretrained models and zero-shot prompting to determine if they closely match human graphical perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T16:14:08Z)
• MLLMs Know Where to Look: Training-free Perception of Small Visual Details with Multimodal LLMs [11.532430076027554]
  We study whether MLLMs can perceive small visual details as effectively as large ones when answering questions about images.<n>We propose training-free visual intervention methods that leverage the internal knowledge of any MLLM itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T18:54:40Z)
• Explore the Hallucination on Low-level Perception for MLLMs [83.12180878559295]
  We aim to define and evaluate the self-awareness of MLLMs in low-level visual perception and understanding tasks. We present QL-Bench, a benchmark settings to simulate human responses to low-level vision. We demonstrate that while some models exhibit robust low-level visual capabilities, their self-awareness remains relatively underdeveloped.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T14:38:29Z)
• Visualization Literacy of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comparative Study [12.367399155606162]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine the inherent power of large language models (LLMs) with the renewed capabilities to reason about the multimodal context. Many recent works in visualization have demonstrated MLLMs' capability to understand and interpret visualization results and explain the content of the visualization to users in natural language. In this work, we aim to fill the gap by utilizing the concept of visualization literacy to evaluate MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:52:16Z)
• Exploring Perceptual Limitation of Multimodal Large Language Models [57.567868157293994]
  We quantitatively study the perception of small visual objects in several state-of-the-art MLLMs. We identify four independent factors that can contribute to this limitation. Lower object quality and smaller object size can both independently reduce MLLMs' ability to answer visual questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T03:04:42Z)
• Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs [50.77984109941538]
  Our research reveals that the visual capabilities in recent multimodal LLMs still exhibit systematic shortcomings. We identify ''CLIP-blind pairs'' - images that CLIP perceives as similar despite their clear visual differences. We evaluate various CLIP-based vision-and-language models and found a notable correlation between visual patterns that challenge CLIP models and those problematic for multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T18:58:36Z)
• Machine Vision Therapy: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Enhance Visual Robustness via Denoising In-Context Learning [67.0609518552321]
  We propose to conduct Machine Vision Therapy which aims to rectify the noisy predictions from vision models. By fine-tuning with the denoised labels, the learning model performance can be boosted in an unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T07:29:14Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)
• From CLIP to DINO: Visual Encoders Shout in Multi-modal Large Language Models [36.41816380074965]
  We investigate the effectiveness of different vision encoders within Large Language Models (MLLMs) Our findings reveal that the shallow layer features of CLIP offer particular advantages for fine-grained tasks such as grounding and region understanding. We propose a simple yet effective feature merging strategy, named COMM, that integrates CLIP and DINO with Multi-level features Merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T02:41:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.