A Proactive Insider Threat Management Framework Using Explainable Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19883v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:08:38 GMT
• Title: A Proactive Insider Threat Management Framework Using Explainable Machine Learning
• Authors: Selma Shikonde, Mike Wa Nkongolo,
• Abstract summary: This study proposes the Insider Threat Explainable Machine Learning (IT-XML) framework to enhance proactive insider threat management.<n>A quantitative approach is adopted using an online questionnaire to assess employees' knowledge of insider threat patterns.<n>The framework classified all organisations at the developing security maturity level with 97-98% confidence and achieved a classification accuracy of 91.7%.
• Score: 0.14323566945483496
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Over the years, the technological landscape has evolved, reshaping the security posture of organisations and increasing their exposure to cybersecurity threats, many originating from within. Insider threats remain a major challenge, particularly in sectors where cybersecurity infrastructure, expertise, and regulations are still developing. This study proposes the Insider Threat Explainable Machine Learning (IT-XML) framework, which integrates the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) with Hidden Markov Models (HMM) to enhance proactive insider threat management and decision-making. A quantitative approach is adopted using an online questionnaire to assess employees' knowledge of insider threat patterns, access control, privacy practices, and existing policies across three large data-sensitive organisations. The IT-XML framework provides assessment capabilities through survey-based data, HMM-driven pattern recognition for security maturity classification, and evidence-based recommendations for proactive threat mitigation. The framework classified all organisations at the developing security maturity level with 97-98% confidence and achieved a classification accuracy of 91.7%, identifying audit log access limits as the most critical control. Random Forest analysis highlighted vendor breach notifications (0.081) and regular audit log reviews (0.052) as key determinants of resilience. Explainability methods such as SHAP and LIME improved model transparency and interpretability, demonstrating the framework's potential to strengthen insider threat management practices.

Related papers

• SAGE-LLM: Towards Safe and Generalizable LLM Controller with Fuzzy-CBF Verification and Graph-Structured Knowledge Retrieval for UAV Decision [46.089736018739295]
  Large Language Models (LLM) lack domain-specific UAV control knowledge and formal safety assurances.<n>This paper proposes a train-free two-layer decision architecture based on LLMs, integrating high-level safety planning with low-level precise control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T06:41:04Z)
• ORCA -- An Automated Threat Analysis Pipeline for O-RAN Continuous Development [57.61878484176942]
  Open-Radio Access Network (O-RAN) integrates numerous software components in a cloud-like deployment, opening the radio access network to previously unconsidered security threats.<n>Current vulnerability assessment practices often rely on manual, labor-intensive, and subjective investigations, leading to inconsistencies in the threat analysis.<n>We propose an automated pipeline that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) to minimize human intervention and associated biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T07:31:59Z)
• Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies [57.521647436515785]
  We define frontier AI auditing as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims.<n>We introduce AI Assurance Levels (AAL-1 to AAL-4), ranging from time-bounded system audits to continuous, deception-resilient verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T18:44:09Z)
• Standardized Threat Taxonomy for AI Security, Governance, and Regulatory Compliance [0.0]
  "Language barrier" currently separates technical security teams, who focus on algorithmic vulnerabilities, from legal and compliance professionals, who address regulatory mandates.<n>This research presents the AI System Threat Vector taxonomy, a structured ontology designed explicitly for Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)<n>The framework categorizes AI-specific risks into nine critical domains: Misuse, Poisoning, Privacy, Adrial, Biases, Unreliable Outputs, Drift, Supply Chain, and IP Threat, integrating 53 operationally defined sub-threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T20:42:46Z)
• SafeRBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Safety Assessment in Large Reasoning Models [60.8821834954637]
  We present SafeRBench, the first benchmark that assesses LRM safety end-to-end.<n>We pioneer the incorporation of risk categories and levels into input design.<n>We introduce a micro-thought chunking mechanism to segment long reasoning traces into semantically coherent units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T06:46:33Z)
• A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents [45.53643260046778]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of autonomous AI agents.<n>These large-model agents mark a paradigm shift from static inference systems to interactive, memory-augmented entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T13:34:34Z)
• Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents [43.303548143175256]
  This study proposes an auditing framework for conversational privacy that quantifies an agent's susceptibility to risks.<n>The proposed Conversational Manipulation for Privacy Leakage (CMPL) framework is designed to stress-test agents that enforce strict privacy directives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T20:47:37Z)
• A Novel Framework To Assess Cybersecurity Capability Maturity [0.0]
  We propose a novel Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Framework.<n>It is holistic, flexible, and measurable to provide organisations with a more relevant and impactful assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T02:29:35Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Comprehensive Digital Forensics and Risk Mitigation Strategy for Modern Enterprises [0.0]
  This study outlines an approach to cybersecurity, including proactive threat anticipation, forensic investigations, and compliance with regulations like CCPA.<n>Key threats such as social engineering, insider risks, phishing, and ransomware are examined, along with mitigation strategies leveraging AI and machine learning.<n>The findings emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring, policy enforcement, and adaptive security measures to protect sensitive data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T23:18:49Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Threat-Informed Cyber Resilience Index: A Probabilistic Quantitative Approach to Measure Defence Effectiveness Against Cyber Attacks [0.36832029288386137]
  This paper introduces the Cyber Resilience Index (CRI), a threat-informed probabilistic approach to quantifying an organisation's defence effectiveness against cyber-attacks (campaigns) Building upon the Threat-Intelligence Based Security Assessment (TIBSA) methodology, we present a mathematical model that translates complex threat intelligence into an actionable, unified metric similar to a stock market index, that executives can understand and interact with while teams can act upon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:51:48Z)
• A Relevance Model for Threat-Centric Ranking of Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities [0.29998889086656577]
  The relentless process of tracking and remediating vulnerabilities is a top concern for cybersecurity professionals. We provide a framework for vulnerability management specifically focused on mitigating threats using adversary criteria derived from MITRE ATT&CK. Our results show an average 71.5% - 91.3% improvement towards the identification of vulnerabilities likely to be targeted and exploited by cyber threat actors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T23:29:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.