FinCARE: Financial Causal Analysis with Reasoning and Evidence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20221v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 05:14:28 GMT
• Title: FinCARE: Financial Causal Analysis with Reasoning and Evidence
• Authors: Alejandro Michel, Abhinav Arun, Bhaskarjit Sarmah, Stefano Pasquali,
• Abstract summary: Portfolio managers rely on correlation-based analysis and methods that fail to capture true causal relationships driving performance.<n>We present a hybrid framework that integrates statistical causal discovery algorithms with domain knowledge from two complementary sources: a financial knowledge graph extracted from SEC 10-K filings and large language model reasoning.
• Score: 39.146761527401424
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Portfolio managers rely on correlation-based analysis and heuristic methods that fail to capture true causal relationships driving performance. We present a hybrid framework that integrates statistical causal discovery algorithms with domain knowledge from two complementary sources: a financial knowledge graph extracted from SEC 10-K filings and large language model reasoning. Our approach systematically enhances three representative causal discovery paradigms, constraint-based (PC), score-based (GES), and continuous optimization (NOTEARS), by encoding knowledge graph constraints algorithmically and leveraging LLM conceptual reasoning for hypothesis generation. Evaluated on a synthetic financial dataset of 500 firms across 18 variables, our KG+LLM-enhanced methods demonstrate consistent improvements across all three algorithms: PC (F1: 0.622 vs. 0.459 baseline, +36%), GES (F1: 0.735 vs. 0.367, +100%), and NOTEARS (F1: 0.759 vs. 0.163, +366%). The framework enables reliable scenario analysis with mean absolute error of 0.003610 for counterfactual predictions and perfect directional accuracy for intervention effects. It also addresses critical limitations of existing methods by grounding statistical discoveries in financial domain expertise while maintaining empirical validation, providing portfolio managers with the causal foundation necessary for proactive risk management and strategic decision-making in dynamic market environments.

Related papers

• The GT-Score: A Robust Objective Function for Reducing Overfitting in Data-Driven Trading Strategies [51.56484100374058]
  GT-Score is a composite objective function that integrates performance, statistical significance, consistency, and downside risk.<n>In walk-forward validation, GT-Score improves the generalization ratio by 98% relative to baseline objective functions.<n>These results suggest that embedding an anti-overfitting structure into the objective can improve the reliability of backtests in quantitative research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T05:16:47Z)
• A Benchmark of Causal vs Correlation AI for Predictive Maintenance [0.0]
  This study evaluates eight predictive models, ranging from baseline statistical approaches to formal causal inference methods, on a dataset of 10,000 CNC machines.<n>The formal causal inference model (L5) achieved estimated annual cost savings of 1.16 million USD (a 70.2 percent reduction), outperforming the best correlation-based decision tree model (L3) by approximately 80,000 USD per year.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T23:59:37Z)
• Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Confidence via Topological and Dirichlet Risk Analysis [3.4324137096523746]
  Chain-of-thought prompting enables Large Language Models to solve complex problems.<n>Existing methods suffer from poor calibration and severe overconfidence on incorrect predictions.<n>We propose Enhanced Dirichlet and Topology Risk (EDTR) to measure confidence across multiple reasoning paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T16:09:02Z)
• CoT-Saliency: Unified Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Heterogeneous Saliency Tasks [96.64597365827046]
  We present the first unified framework that jointly handles three operationally heterogeneous saliency tasks.<n>We introduce a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning process in a Vision-Language Model (VLM) to bridge task heterogeneity.<n>We show our model matches or outperforms specialized SOTA methods and strong closed-source VLMs across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T04:37:01Z)
• Enhancing Credit Risk Prediction: A Meta-Learning Framework Integrating Baseline Models, LASSO, and ECOC for Superior Accuracy [7.254744067646655]
  This research proposes a comprehensive meta-learning framework that synthesizes multiple complementary models.<n>We implement Permutation Feature Importance analysis for each prediction class across all constituent models.<n>Results demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the accuracy of financial entity classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:09:04Z)
• The Statistical Fairness-Accuracy Frontier [50.323024516295725]
  Machine learning models must balance accuracy and fairness, but these goals often conflict.<n>A useful tool for understanding this trade-off is the fairness-accuracy frontier, which characterizes the set of models that cannot be simultaneously improved in both fairness and accuracy.<n>We study the FA frontier in the finite-sample regime, showing how it deviates from its population counterpart and quantifying the worst-case gap between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T03:01:35Z)
• Trustworthy Reasoning: Evaluating and Enhancing Factual Accuracy in LLM Intermediate Thought Processes [16.451488374845407]
  We present a novel framework addressing a critical vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This phenomenon poses substantial risks in high-stakes domains including healthcare, legal analysis, and scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T10:34:51Z)
• Distributionally Robust Optimization with Adversarial Data Contamination [49.89480853499918]
  We focus on optimizing Wasserstein-1 DRO objectives for generalized linear models with convex Lipschitz loss functions.<n>Our primary contribution lies in a novel modeling framework that integrates robustness against training data contamination with robustness against distributional shifts.<n>This work establishes the first rigorous guarantees, supported by efficient computation, for learning under the dual challenges of data contamination and distributional shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T18:34:10Z)
• A Framework for Predictive Directional Trading Based on Volatility and Causal Inference [0.0]
  This study introduces a novel framework for identifying and exploiting predictive lead-lag relationships in financial markets.<n>We propose an integrated approach that combines advanced statistical methodologies with machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T16:53:32Z)
• Predicting Liquidity-Aware Bond Yields using Causal GANs and Deep Reinforcement Learning with LLM Evaluation [0.0]
  We generate high-fidelity synthetic bond yield data for four major bond categories (AAA, BAA, US10Y,)<n>We employ a finetuned Large Language Model (LLM) Qwen2.5-7B that generates trading signals, risk assessments, and volatility projections.<n>The reinforcement learning-enhanced synthetic data generation achieves the least Mean Absolute Error of 0.103, demonstrating its effectiveness in replicating real-world bond market dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T09:46:37Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs [70.44714133412592]
  Uncertainty Sampling is an Active Learning strategy that aims to improve the data efficiency of machine learning models.<n>We benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies.<n>We develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T16:50:47Z)
• DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
  federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data. We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.