Large Language Models as Model Organisms for Human Associative Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21408v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:52:11 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models as Model Organisms for Human Associative Learning
• Authors: Camila Kolling, Vy Ai Vo, Mariya Toneva,
• Abstract summary: We adapt a cognitive neuroscience associative learning paradigm and investigate how representations evolve across six models.<n>Our initial findings reveal a non-monotonic pattern consistent with the Non-Monotonic Plasticity Hypothesis.<n>We find that higher vocabulary interference amplifies differentiation, suggesting that representational change is influenced by both item similarity and global competition.
• Score: 9.196745903193609
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Associative learning--forming links between co-occurring items--is fundamental to human cognition, reshaping internal representations in complex ways. Testing hypotheses on how representational changes occur in biological systems is challenging, but large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable alternative. Building on LLMs' in-context learning, we adapt a cognitive neuroscience associative learning paradigm and investigate how representations evolve across six models. Our initial findings reveal a non-monotonic pattern consistent with the Non-Monotonic Plasticity Hypothesis, with moderately similar items differentiating after learning. Leveraging the controllability of LLMs, we further show that this differentiation is modulated by the overlap of associated items with the broader vocabulary--a factor we term vocabulary interference, capturing how new associations compete with prior knowledge. We find that higher vocabulary interference amplifies differentiation, suggesting that representational change is influenced by both item similarity and global competition. Our findings position LLMs not only as powerful tools for studying representational dynamics in human-like learning systems, but also as accessible and general computational models for generating new hypotheses about the principles underlying memory reorganization in the brain.

Related papers

• A Brain-like Synergistic Core in LLMs Drives Behaviour and Learning [50.68188138112555]
  We show that large language models spontaneously develop synergistic cores.<n>We find that areas in middle layers exhibit synergistic processing while early and late layers rely on redundancy.<n>This convergence suggests that synergistic information processing is a fundamental property of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T10:48:35Z)
• Generative Human-Object Interaction Detection via Differentiable Cognitive Steering of Multi-modal LLMs [85.69785384599827]
  Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to localize human-object pairs and the interactions between them.<n>Existing methods operate under a closed-world assumption, treating the task as a classification problem over a small, predefined verb set.<n>We propose GRASP-HO, a novel Generative Reasoning And Steerable Perception framework that reformulates HOI detection from the closed-set classification task to the open-vocabulary generation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T14:41:50Z)
• Unraveling the cognitive patterns of Large Language Models through module communities [45.399985422756224]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have reshaped our world with significant advancements in science, engineering, and society.<n>Despite their ubiquity and utility, the underlying mechanisms of LLM remain concealed within billions of parameters and complex structures.<n>We address this gap by adopting approaches to understanding emerging cognition in biology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T16:49:38Z)
• Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study [50.065744358362345]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning.<n>Yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T13:24:50Z)
• Quantifying Cross-Modality Memorization in Vision-Language Models [86.82366725590508]
  We study the unique characteristics of cross-modality memorization and conduct a systematic study centered on vision-language models.<n>Our results reveal that facts learned in one modality transfer to the other, but a significant gap exists between recalling information in the source and target modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T16:10:47Z)
• Do Large Language Models Think Like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidence from fMRI and Hierarchical Embeddings [28.210559128941593]
  This study investigates how hierarchical representations in large language models align with the dynamic neural responses during human sentence comprehension.<n>Results show that improvements in model performance drive the evolution of representational architectures toward brain-like hierarchies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T16:40:06Z)
• From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaning [63.25540801694765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate striking linguistic abilities, yet whether they achieve this same balance remains unclear.<n>We apply the Information Bottleneck principle to quantitatively compare how LLMs and humans navigate this compression-meaning trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:29:00Z)
• Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy between Performance and Competence [49.60849499134362]
  This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning)<n>We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.<n>We found: (1) Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic methods reveal that language performance and competence are distinct; (2) Direct probability measurement may not accurately assess linguistic competence; and (3) Instruction tuning won't change much competence but improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
• Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network [16.317199232071232]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective models of the human language system. In this work, we investigate the key architectural components driving the surprising alignment of untrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T12:54:03Z)
• LLMs as Models for Analogical Reasoning [14.412456982731467]
  Analogical reasoning is fundamental to human cognition and learning.<n>Recent studies have shown that large language models can sometimes match humans in analogical reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T20:07:37Z)
• Heterogeneous Contrastive Learning for Foundation Models and Beyond [73.74745053250619]
  In the era of big data and Artificial Intelligence, an emerging paradigm is to utilize contrastive self-supervised learning to model large-scale heterogeneous data. This survey critically evaluates the current landscape of heterogeneous contrastive learning for foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T02:55:49Z)
• The dynamic interplay between in-context and in-weight learning in humans and neural networks [16.43008975197273]
  We show that "in-context learning" (ICL) can equip neural networks with fundamentally different learning properties that can coexist with their native IWL.<n>Our work shows how emergent ICL can equip neural networks with fundamentally different learning properties that can coexist with their native IWL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:55:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.