Epistemic Deep Learning: Enabling Machine Learning Models to Know When They Do Not Know

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22261v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 12:00:19 GMT
• Title: Epistemic Deep Learning: Enabling Machine Learning Models to Know When They Do Not Know
• Authors: Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal,
• Abstract summary: This thesis advances the paradigm of Epistemic Artificial Intelligence, which explicitly models and quantifies uncertainty.<n>Central to this work is the development of the Random-Set Neural Network (RS-NN), a novel methodology that leverages random set theory to predict belief functions.<n>The title encapsulates the core philosophy of this work, emphasizing that true intelligence involves recognizing and managing the limits of one's own knowledge.
• Score: 1.8613536568358358
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning has achieved remarkable successes, yet its deployment in safety-critical domains remains hindered by an inherent inability to manage uncertainty, resulting in overconfident and unreliable predictions when models encounter out-of-distribution data, adversarial perturbations, or naturally fluctuating environments. This thesis, titled Epistemic Deep Learning: Enabling Machine Learning Models to 'Know When They Do Not Know', addresses these critical challenges by advancing the paradigm of Epistemic Artificial Intelligence, which explicitly models and quantifies epistemic uncertainty: the uncertainty arising from limited, biased, or incomplete training data, as opposed to the irreducible randomness of aleatoric uncertainty, thereby empowering models to acknowledge their limitations and refrain from overconfident decisions when uncertainty is high. Central to this work is the development of the Random-Set Neural Network (RS-NN), a novel methodology that leverages random set theory to predict belief functions over sets of classes, capturing the extent of epistemic uncertainty through the width of associated credal sets, applications of RS-NN, including its adaptation to Large Language Models (LLMs) and its deployment in weather classification for autonomous racing. In addition, the thesis proposes a unified evaluation framework for uncertainty-aware classifiers. Extensive experiments validate that integrating epistemic awareness into deep learning not only mitigates the risks associated with overconfident predictions but also lays the foundation for a paradigm shift in artificial intelligence, where the ability to 'know when it does not know' becomes a hallmark of robust and dependable systems. The title encapsulates the core philosophy of this work, emphasizing that true intelligence involves recognizing and managing the limits of one's own knowledge.

Related papers

• Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation [68.106428321492]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding.<n>LLMs hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans.<n>We present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T10:26:58Z)
• Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know' [10.098470725619384]
  Despite AI's impressive achievements, there remains a significant gap in the ability of AI systems to handle uncertainty.<n>Traditional machine learning approaches struggle to address this issue, due to an overemphasis on data fitting.<n>This position paper posits a paradigm shift towards epistemic artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for models to learn from what they know.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T05:10:38Z)
• Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networks [1.104960878651584]
  Uncertainty is a key feature of any machine learning model. It is particularly important in neural networks, which tend to be overconfident. Uncertainty as XAI improves the model's trustworthiness in downstream decision-making tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T10:22:48Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• Evidential Deep Learning: Enhancing Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Earth System Science Applications [0.32302664881848275]
  Evidential deep learning is a technique that extends parametric deep learning to higher-order distributions. This study compares the uncertainty derived from evidential neural networks to those obtained from ensembles. We show evidential deep learning models attaining predictive accuracy rivaling standard methods, while robustly quantifying both sources of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T23:04:51Z)
• Random-Set Neural Networks (RS-NN) [4.549947259731147]
  We propose a novel Random-Set Neural Network (RS-NN) approach to classification.<n> RS-NN encodes the 'epistemic' uncertainty induced by training sets that are insufficiently representative.<n>Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art Bayesian and Ensemble methods in terms of accuracy, uncertainty estimation and out-of-distribution (OoD) detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T20:00:35Z)
• Neural State-Space Models: Empirical Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification [0.0]
  This paper presents preliminary results on uncertainty quantification for system identification with neural state-space models. We frame the learning problem in a Bayesian probabilistic setting and obtain posterior distributions for the neural network's weights and outputs. Based on the posterior, we construct credible intervals on the outputs and define a surprise index which can effectively diagnose usage of the model in a potentially dangerous out-of-distribution regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T08:57:33Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction [56.087230230128185]
  Epistemic uncertainty is part of out-of-sample prediction error due to the lack of knowledge of the learner. We propose a principled approach for directly estimating epistemic uncertainty by learning to predict generalization error and subtracting an estimate of aleatoric uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T23:50:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.