Rate-optimal Design for Anytime Best Arm Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23199v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:36:56 GMT
- Title: Rate-optimal Design for Anytime Best Arm Identification
- Authors: Junpei Komiyama, Kyoungseok Jang, Junya Honda,
- Abstract summary: We consider the best arm identification problem, where the goal is to identify the arm with the highest mean reward from a set of $K$ arms under a limited sampling budget.<n>This problem models many practical scenarios such as A/B testing.<n>We consider a class of algorithms for this problem, which is provably minimax optimal up to a constant factor.
- Score: 19.803714682639903
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We consider the best arm identification problem, where the goal is to identify the arm with the highest mean reward from a set of $K$ arms under a limited sampling budget. This problem models many practical scenarios such as A/B testing. We consider a class of algorithms for this problem, which is provably minimax optimal up to a constant factor. This idea is a generalization of existing works in fixed-budget best arm identification, which are limited to a particular choice of risk measures. Based on the framework, we propose Almost Tracking, a closed-form algorithm that has a provable guarantee on the popular risk measure $H_1$. Unlike existing algorithms, Almost Tracking does not require the total budget in advance nor does it need to discard a significant part of samples, which gives a practical advantage. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, we show that our algorithm outperforms existing anytime algorithms as well as fixed-budget algorithms.
Related papers
- Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget [55.938644481736446]
We introduce a novel algorithm for best feasible arm identification that guarantees an exponential decay in the error probability.<n>We validate our algorithm through comprehensive empirical evaluations across various problem instances with different levels of complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T02:56:26Z) - Balancing Performance and Costs in Best Arm Identification [5.558508644689221]
We propose a new formalism to minimize the risk functional which explicitly balances the performance of the recommended arm and the cost incurred by learning this arm.<n>In this framework, a cost is incurred for each observation during the sampling phase, and upon recommending an arm, a performance penalty is incurred for identifying a suboptimal arm.<n>We derive theoretical lower bounds for the risk of each of two choices for the performance penalty, the probability of misidentification and the simple regret, and propose an algorithm called DBCARE to match these lower bounds up to polylog factors on nearly all problem instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T23:33:43Z) - Optimal Multi-Objective Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence [62.36929749450298]
We consider a multi-armed bandit setting in which each arm yields an $M$-dimensional vector reward upon selection.<n>The end goal is to identify the best arm of em every objective in the shortest (expected) time subject to an upper bound on the probability of error.<n>We propose an algorithm that uses the novel idea of em surrogate proportions to sample the arms at each time step, eliminating the need to solve the max-min optimisation problem at each step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T12:28:09Z) - Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification [65.23078799972188]
In bandit best-arm identification, an algorithm is tasked with finding the arm with highest mean reward with a specified accuracy as fast as possible.<n>We study multi-fidelity best-arm identification, in which the can choose to sample an arm at a lower fidelity (less accurate mean estimate) for a lower cost.<n>Several methods have been proposed for tackling this problem, but their optimality remain elusive, notably due to loose lower bounds on the total cost needed to identify the best arm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T08:02:40Z) - Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective [54.305323903582845]
We present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms.
In particular, we present sred, a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in it any round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T13:17:43Z) - Mean-based Best Arm Identification in Stochastic Bandits under Reward
Contamination [80.53485617514707]
This paper proposes two algorithms, a gap-based algorithm and one based on the successive elimination, for best arm identification in sub-Gaussian bandits.
Specifically, for the gap-based algorithm, the sample complexity is optimal up to constant factors, while for the successive elimination, it is optimal up to logarithmic factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-14T21:49:58Z) - Fixed-Budget Best-Arm Identification in Structured Bandits [33.27743152847947]
Best-arm identification (BAI) in a fixed-budget setting is a bandit problem where the learning agent maximizes the probability of identifying the optimal (best) arm after a fixed number of observations.
We propose a general tractable algorithm that incorporates the structure, by eliminating suboptimal arms based on their mean reward estimates from a joint generalization model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T01:32:43Z) - Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Bandits [79.3239137440876]
We devise a simple algorithm whose sampling complexity matches known instance-specific lower bounds.
Unlike existing best-arm identification strategies, our algorithm uses a stopping rule that does not depend on the number of arms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-29T14:25:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.