Lightweight Robust Direct Preference Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23590v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:55:06 GMT
• Title: Lightweight Robust Direct Preference Optimization
• Authors: Cheol Woo Kim, Shresth Verma, Mauricio Tec, Milind Tambe,
• Abstract summary: We propose DPO-PRO (DPO with Preference Robustness), a robust fine-tuning algorithm based on DPO.<n>Unlike prior DRO-based variants, DPO-PRO focuses solely on uncertainty in preferences, avoiding unnecessary conservatism and incurring negligible computational overhead.
• Score: 26.99327564250612
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a popular method for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) due to its stability and simplicity. However, it is also known to be sensitive to noise in the data and prone to overfitting. Recent works have proposed using distributionally robust optimization (DRO) to address potential noise and distributional shift in the data. However, these methods often suffer from excessive conservatism and high computational cost. We propose DPO-PRO (DPO with Preference Robustness), a robust fine-tuning algorithm based on DPO which accounts for uncertainty in the preference distribution through a lightweight DRO formulation. Unlike prior DRO-based variants, DPO-PRO focuses solely on uncertainty in preferences, avoiding unnecessary conservatism and incurring negligible computational overhead. We further show that DPO-PRO is equivalent to a regularized DPO objective that penalizes model overconfidence under weak preference signals. We evaluate DPO-PRO on standard alignment benchmarks and a real-world public health task. Experimental results show that our method consistently improves robustness to noisy preference signals compared to existing DPO variants.

Related papers

• Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z)
• Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
  We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z)
• Preference Robustness for DPO with Applications to Public Health [26.99327564250612]
  We propose DPO-PRO, a robust fine-tuning algorithm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)<n>We evaluate DPO-PRO on a real-world maternal mobile health program operated by the non-profit organization ARMMAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T18:10:32Z)
• Inducing Robustness in a 2 Dimensional Direct Preference Optimization Paradigm [16.66633426354087]
  Direct Preference optimisation (DPO) has emerged as a powerful method for aligning Large Language Models with human preferences.<n>We investigate the performance of DPO using open-source preference datasets.<n>We propose an approach of incorporating segment-level score noise robustness to the 2D-DPO algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T05:59:13Z)
• Uncertainty-Penalized Direct Preference Optimization [52.387088396044206]
  We develop a pessimistic framework for DPO by introducing preference uncertainty penalization schemes. The penalization serves as a correction to the loss which attenuates the loss gradient for uncertain samples. We show improved overall performance compared to vanilla DPO, as well as better completions on prompts from high-uncertainty chosen/rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T14:24:37Z)
• AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization [45.46582930202524]
  $alpha$-DPO is an adaptive preference optimization algorithm for large language models.<n>It balances the policy model and the reference model to achieve personalized reward margins.<n>It consistently outperforms DPO and SimPO across various model settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:29:57Z)
• Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness [8.971332948872185]
  Learning from human preference is a paradigm used in large-scale language model (LLM) fine-tuning step to better align pretrained LLM to human preference for downstream task. Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has been proposed to solve the alignment problem with a simplified RL-free method. In this article, we analyze the working mechanism of $beta$ in DPO, disclose its syntax difference between RL algorithm and DPO, and understand the potential shortage brought by the DPO simplification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:29:31Z)
• Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization [45.6430987775264]
  This study addresses the challenge of noise in training datasets for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)<n>We categorize noise into pointwise noise, which includes low-quality data points, and pairwise noise, which encompasses erroneous data pair associations.<n>We introduce Distributionally Robustifying DPO, which integrates pairwise robustness by optimizing against worst-case pairwise scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T17:48:25Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Models [63.71853401569461]
  We propose D2PO, discriminator-guided DPO, for the online setting where preferences are being collected throughout learning. As we collect gold preferences, we use these not only to train our policy, but to train a discriminative response evaluation model to silver-label even more synthetic data for policy training. We show conditions under which silver labeling is most helpful: it is most effective when training the policy with DPO, outperforming traditional PPO, and benefits from maintaining a separate discriminator from the policy model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:44:41Z)
• Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [75.83359213697854]
  Recent advancements suggest that directly working with preference probabilities can yield a more accurate reflection of human preferences. We propose a self-play-based method for language model alignment, which treats the problem as a constant-sum two-player game. Our approach, dubbed Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPPO), utilizes iterative policy updates to provably approximate the Nash equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T17:59:20Z)
• RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models [7.676477609461592]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been extensively employed to align large language models with user intent. DPO relies on contrastive responses generated from human annotator and alternative LLM, instead of the policy model. In this paper, we address both challenges by systematically combining sampling rejection (RS) and DPO. Our proposed method effectively fine-tunes LLMs with limited resource environments, leading to improved alignment with user intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T16:00:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.