Managing Administrative Law Cases using an Adaptable Model-driven Norm-enforcing Tool

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24822v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:27:29 GMT
• Title: Managing Administrative Law Cases using an Adaptable Model-driven Norm-enforcing Tool
• Abstract summary: This paper reports on the implementation of a model-driven case management tool for administrative law cases.<n>Our tool achieves adaptability and norm enforcement by interacting with an interpreter for eFLINT.
• Score: 0.764671395172401
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Governmental organisations cope with many laws and policies when handling administrative law cases. Making sure these norms are enforced in the handling of cases is for the most part done manually. However, enforcing policies can get complicated and time consuming with ever-changing (interpretations of) laws and varying cases. This introduces errors and delays in the decision-making process and therefore limits the access to justice for citizens. A potential solution is offered by our tool in which norms are enforced using automated normative reasoning. By ensuring the procedural norms are followed and transparency can be provided about the reasoning behind a decision to citizens, the tool benefits the access to justice for citizens. In this paper we report on the implementation of a model-driven case management tool for administrative law cases, based on a set of requirements elicited during earlier research. Our tool achieves adaptability and norm enforcement by interacting with an interpreter for eFLINT, a domain-specific language for norm specification. We report on the current state of the case management tool and suggest directions for further development.

Related papers

• WisdomInterrogatory (LuWen): An Open-Source Legal Large Language Model Technical Report [55.27414605169639]
  We present WisdomInterrogatory (LuWen), an open-source Chinese legal language model built upon the Baichuan foundation model.<n>We evaluate LuWen on five representative legal tasks spanning both prediction and generation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T06:59:07Z)
• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• XAI-LAW: A Logic Programming Tool for Modeling, Explaining, and Learning Legal Decisions [0.5672012177310438]
  We propose an approach to model articles of the Italian Criminal Code (ICC) using Answer Set Programming (ASP)<n>The developed tool is intended to support legal experts during the criminal trial phase by providing reasoning and possible legal outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:07:30Z)
• Reflections on the design, applications and implementations of the normative specification language eFLINT [0.764671395172401]
  Legal practices involve subjective processes such as interpretation and qualification.<n> computational reasoning with laws requires a cross-disciplinary process involving both legal and software expertise.<n>This paper reflects on the domain-specific software language eFLINT developed to experiment with novel solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T16:09:31Z)
• From Legal Text to Tech Specs: Generative AI's Interpretation of Consent in Privacy Law [0.0]
  This study employs a three-step pipeline that involves using an LLM to classify software use cases for compliance.<n>By benchmarking LLMs against real-world use cases, this research provides insights into leveraging AI-driven solutions to enhance legal compliance of software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T23:36:05Z)
• RLJP: Legal Judgment Prediction via First-Order Logic Rule-enhanced with Large Language Models [58.69183479148083]
  Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is a pivotal task in legal AI.<n>Existing LJP models integrate judicial precedents and legal knowledge for high performance.<n>But they neglect legal reasoning logic, a critical component of legal judgments requiring rigorous logical analysis.<n>This paper proposes a rule-enhanced legal judgment prediction framework based on first-order logic (FOL) formalism and comparative learning (CL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T14:50:21Z)
• A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences [76.73731245899454]
  We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience.<n>Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision.<n>This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the Intelligent Court''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T10:26:54Z)
• LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System [43.13850456765944]
  We introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain. LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T21:51:30Z)
• Towards an Enforceable GDPR Specification [49.1574468325115]
  Privacy by Design (PbD) is prescribed by modern privacy regulations such as the EU's. One emerging technique to realize PbD is enforcement (RE) We present a set of requirements and an iterative methodology for creating formal specifications of legal provisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:38:51Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
• From Legal Contracts to Legal Calculi: the code-driven normativity [0.0]
  We show that interpreting legal contracts as interaction protocols between (untrusted) parties enables the generalisation of formal methods and tools for concurrent systems to the legal setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T10:38:19Z)
• The Case for a Legal Compliance API for the Enforcement of the EU's Digital Services Act on Social Media Platforms [1.0312968200748118]
  This paper critically addresses issues around social media data access for the purpose of digital enforcement. It proposes the use of a legal compliance application programming interface (API) as a means to facilitate compliance with the Digital Services Act. To contextualize this discussion, the paper pursues two scenarios that exemplify the harms arising out of content monetization affecting a particularly vulnerable category of social media users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T14:16:23Z)
• Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is(n't) Law [91.85674537754346]
  Both technical security mechanisms and legal processes serve as mechanisms to deal with misbehaviour according to a set of norms. While they share general similarities, there are also clear differences in how they are defined, act, and the effect they have on subjects. This paper considers the similarities and differences between both types of mechanisms as ways of dealing with misbehaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T18:03:07Z)
• Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents [56.40163943394202]
  We release the Longformer-based pre-trained language model, named as Lawformer, for Chinese legal long documents understanding. We evaluate Lawformer on a variety of LegalAI tasks, including judgment prediction, similar case retrieval, legal reading comprehension, and legal question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-09T09:39:25Z)
• A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU's Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Task [2.248133901806859]
  We propose a 'legal approach' to hate speech detection by operationalization of the decision as to whether a post is subject to criminal law. We show that, by breaking the legal assessment down into a series of simpler sub-decisions, even laypersons can annotate consistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T14:13:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.