Idea2Plan: Exploring AI-Powered Research Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24891v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:54:51 GMT
• Title: Idea2Plan: Exploring AI-Powered Research Planning
• Authors: Jin Huang, Silviu Cucerzan, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Ryen W. White,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to accelerate scientific discovery.<n>We investigate how LLMs can handle the transition from conceptual research ideas to well-structured research plans.<n>Our study provides new insights into LLMs' capability for research planning and lay the groundwork for future progress.
• Score: 9.792815240248476
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to accelerate scientific discovery as valuable tools for analyzing data, generating hypotheses, and supporting innovative approaches in various scientific fields. In this work, we investigate how LLMs can handle the transition from conceptual research ideas to well-structured research plans. Effective research planning not only supports scientists in advancing their research but also represents a crucial capability for the development of autonomous research agents. Despite its importance, the field lacks a systematic understanding of LLMs' research planning capability. To rigorously measure this capability, we introduce the Idea2Plan task and Idea2Plan Bench, a benchmark built from 200 ICML 2025 Spotlight and Oral papers released after major LLM training cutoffs. Each benchmark instance includes a research idea and a grading rubric capturing the key components of valid plans. We further propose Idea2Plan JudgeEval, a complementary benchmark to assess the reliability of LLM-based judges against expert annotations. Experimental results show that GPT-5 and GPT-5-mini achieve the strongest performance on the benchmark, though substantial headroom remains for future improvement. Our study provides new insights into LLMs' capability for research planning and lay the groundwork for future progress.

Related papers

• Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [91.732562776782]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet prevailing science benchmarks probe decontextualized knowledge.<n>We introduce a scenario-grounded benchmark that evaluates LLMs across biology, chemistry, materials, and physics.<n>The framework assesses models at two levels: (i) question-level accuracy on scenario-tied items and (ii) project-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T16:20:03Z)
• Dr.Mi-Bench: A Modular-integrated Benchmark for Scientific Deep Research Agent [52.876617746453995]
  Dr.Mi-Bench is a Modular-integrated benchmark for scientific deep research (DR) agents.<n>Dr.Mi-Eval is a novel modular-integrated evaluation paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T17:16:47Z)
• Understanding Large Language Models' Ability on Interdisciplinary Research [27.539601507270575]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools and collaborators in scientific discovery.<n>The lack of a dedicated benchmark that evaluates LLMs' ability to develop ideas in Interdisciplinary Research poses a critical barrier to fully understanding their strengths and limitations.<n>We introduce IDRBench -- a pioneering benchmark featuring an expert annotated dataset and a suite of tasks tailored to evaluate LLMs' capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T15:43:05Z)
• MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research [70.72318131988102]
  MLR-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating AI agents on open-ended machine learning research.<n>MLR-Bench includes three key components: (1) 201 research tasks sourced from NeurIPS, ICLR, and ICML workshops covering diverse ML topics; (2) MLR-Judge, an automated evaluation framework combining LLM-based reviewers with carefully designed review rubrics to assess research quality; and (3) MLR-Agent, a modular agent scaffold capable of completing research tasks through four stages: idea generation, proposal formulation, experimentation, and paper writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T13:18:37Z)
• Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning [84.30323604785646]
  Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear.<n>We introduce ARIEL (AI Research Assistant for Expert-in-the-Loop Learning), an open-source evaluation and optimization framework.<n>We find that state-of-the-art models generate fluent but incomplete summaries, whereas LMMs struggle with detailed visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T14:21:48Z)
• ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition [67.26124739345332]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined.<n>We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs with a near-sufficient set of sub-tasks of scientific discovery.<n>We develop an automated framework that extracts critical components - research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses - from scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T08:09:15Z)
• PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilities [12.322175348741435]
  LLMs have immense potential for generating plans, transforming an initial world state into a desired goal state.<n>Many of these systems are tailored to specific problems, making it challenging to compare them or determine the best approach for new tasks.<n>Our survey aims to offer a comprehensive overview of current LLM planners to fill this gap.<n>It builds on foundational work by Kartam and Wilkins (1990) and examines six key performance criteria: completeness, executability, optimality, representation, generalization, and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T17:54:57Z)
• LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research [15.533076347375207]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer unprecedented support across various stages of the research cycle.<n>This paper presents the first systematic survey dedicated to exploring how LLMs are revolutionizing the scientific research process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T06:44:02Z)
• Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers [90.26363107905344]
  Large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery. No evaluations have shown that LLM systems can take the very first step of producing novel, expert-level ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T08:25:03Z)
• Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey [98.82513390811148]
  This survey provides the first systematic view of LLM-based agents planning, covering recent works aiming to improve planning ability. Comprehensive analyses are conducted for each direction, and further challenges in the field of research are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T04:25:24Z)
• On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark) [30.223130782579336]
  We develop a benchmark suite based on the kinds of domains employed in the International Planning Competition. We evaluate LLMs in three modes: autonomous, human-in-the-loop and human-in-the-loop. Our results show that LLM's ability to autonomously generate executable plans is quite meager, averaging only about 3% success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T21:37:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.