Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04109v1
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 08:25:03 GMT
- Title: Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers
- Authors: Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori Hashimoto,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery.
No evaluations have shown that LLM systems can take the very first step of producing novel, expert-level ideas.
- Score: 90.26363107905344
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery, with a growing number of works proposing research agents that autonomously generate and validate new ideas. Despite this, no evaluations have shown that LLM systems can take the very first step of producing novel, expert-level ideas, let alone perform the entire research process. We address this by establishing an experimental design that evaluates research idea generation while controlling for confounders and performs the first head-to-head comparison between expert NLP researchers and an LLM ideation agent. By recruiting over 100 NLP researchers to write novel ideas and blind reviews of both LLM and human ideas, we obtain the first statistically significant conclusion on current LLM capabilities for research ideation: we find LLM-generated ideas are judged as more novel (p < 0.05) than human expert ideas while being judged slightly weaker on feasibility. Studying our agent baselines closely, we identify open problems in building and evaluating research agents, including failures of LLM self-evaluation and their lack of diversity in generation. Finally, we acknowledge that human judgements of novelty can be difficult, even by experts, and propose an end-to-end study design which recruits researchers to execute these ideas into full projects, enabling us to study whether these novelty and feasibility judgements result in meaningful differences in research outcome.
Related papers
- Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains.
Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities.
We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z) - Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants [26.588095150057384]
Agent Laboratory is an autonomous framework capable of completing the entire research process.
It accepts a human-provided research idea and progresses through three stages--literature review, experimentation, and report writing.
Agent Laboratory significantly reduces research expenses, achieving an 84% decrease compared to previous autonomous research methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T01:58:42Z) - IdeaBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Research Idea Generation [19.66218274796796]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed how people interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
We propose IdeaBench, a benchmark system that includes a comprehensive dataset and an evaluation framework.
Our dataset comprises titles and abstracts from a diverse range of influential papers, along with their referenced works.
Our evaluation framework is a two-stage process: first, using GPT-4o to rank ideas based on user-specified quality indicators such as novelty and feasibility, enabling scalable personalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T17:04:59Z) - AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research [34.88341605349765]
We introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks.
AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T17:58:29Z) - Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agents [64.64280477958283]
An exponential increase in scientific literature makes it challenging for researchers to stay current with recent advances and identify meaningful research directions.
Recent developments in large language models(LLMs) suggest a promising avenue for automating the generation of novel research ideas.
We propose a Chain-of-Ideas(CoI) agent, an LLM-based agent that organizes relevant literature in a chain structure to effectively mirror the progressive development in a research domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T03:26:37Z) - Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [62.832818186789545]
Virtual Scientists (VirSci) is a multi-agent system designed to mimic the teamwork inherent in scientific research.
VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas.
We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel scientific ideas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z) - LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing [106.45895712717612]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks.
This study focuses on the topic of LLMs assist NLP Researchers.
To our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such a comprehensive analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T01:30:22Z) - ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.
ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.
We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.