Teaching Probabilistic Machine Learning in the Liberal Arts: Empowering Socially and Mathematically Informed AI Discourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25049v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:20:28 GMT
• Title: Teaching Probabilistic Machine Learning in the Liberal Arts: Empowering Socially and Mathematically Informed AI Discourse
• Authors: Yaniv Yacoby,
• Abstract summary: We present a new undergraduate ML course at our institution, a small liberal arts college serving students minoritized in STEM.<n>We propose a "framework-focused" approach, teaching students the language and formalism of probabilistic modeling.<n>We introduce methodological concepts through a whimsical, yet realistic theme, the "Intergalactic Hypothetical Hospital," to make the content both relevant and accessible.
• Score: 0.7106986689736828
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a new undergraduate ML course at our institution, a small liberal arts college serving students minoritized in STEM, designed to empower students to critically connect the mathematical foundations of ML with its sociotechnical implications. We propose a "framework-focused" approach, teaching students the language and formalism of probabilistic modeling while leveraging probabilistic programming to lower mathematical barriers. We introduce methodological concepts through a whimsical, yet realistic theme, the "Intergalactic Hypothetical Hospital," to make the content both relevant and accessible. Finally, we pair each technical innovation with counter-narratives that challenge its value using real, open-ended case-studies to cultivate dialectical thinking. By encouraging creativity in modeling and highlighting unresolved ethical challenges, we help students recognize the value and need of their unique perspectives, empowering them to participate confidently in AI discourse as technologists and critical citizens.

Related papers

• Integration of AI in STEM Education, Addressing Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings [0.0]
  The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into K-12 STEM education presents transformative opportunities alongside significant ethical challenges.<n>This paper examines the dual-edged impact of AI in STEM classrooms, analyzing its benefits (e.g., adaptive learning, real-time feedback) and drawbacks (e.g., surveillance risks, pedagogical limitations) through an ethical lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T03:07:26Z)
• Aesthetic Experience and Educational Value in Co-creating Art with Generative AI: Evidence from a Survey of Young Learners [1.9863718017611578]
  This study investigates the aesthetic experience and educational value of collaborative artmaking with generative artificial intelligence (AI) among young learners and art students.<n>Based on a survey of 112 participants, we examine how human creators renegotiate their roles, how conventional notions of originality are challenged, and how aesthetic judgment is formed in human--AI co-creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T17:55:46Z)
• Bridging MOOCs, Smart Teaching, and AI: A Decade of Evolution Toward a Unified Pedagogy [4.943165921136573]
  We propose a three-layer instructional framework that combines the scalability of MOOCs, the responsiveness of Smart Teaching, and the adaptivity of AI.<n>The findings highlight the framework's potential to enhance learner engagement, support instructors, and enable personalized yet scalable learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T14:57:20Z)
• Assessing Adaptive World Models in Machines with Novel Games [77.94506923046423]
  We argue that rapid adaptation is linked to the efficient construction and refinement of internal representations of the environment.<n>Current understanding and evaluation of world models in artificial intelligence remains narrow.<n>We propose a new benchmarking paradigm based on suites of carefully designed games with genuine, deep and continually refreshing novelty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T06:28:14Z)
• A Human-Centric Approach to Explainable AI for Personalized Education [1.0878040851638]
  This thesis aims to bring human needs to the forefront of eXplainable AI (XAI) research.<n>We propose four novel technical contributions in interpretability with a multimodal modular architecture.<n>Our work lays a foundation for human-centric AI systems that balance state-of-the-art performance with built-in transparency and trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T16:23:48Z)
• Latent-Predictive Empowerment: Measuring Empowerment without a Simulator [56.53777237504011]
  We present Latent-Predictive Empowerment (LPE), an algorithm that can compute empowerment in a more practical manner. LPE learns large skillsets by maximizing an objective that is a principled replacement for the mutual information between skills and states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T00:41:18Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• A Novel Neural-symbolic System under Statistical Relational Learning [47.30190559449236]
  We propose a neural-symbolic framework based on statistical relational learning, referred to as NSF-SRL.<n>Results of symbolic reasoning are utilized to refine and correct the predictions made by deep learning models, while deep learning models enhance the efficiency of the symbolic reasoning process.<n>We believe that this approach sets a new standard for neural-symbolic systems and will drive future research in the field of general artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T09:15:37Z)
• Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMs [64.06811786616471]
  We introduce an innovative methodology that synthesizes human insights with the computational prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs) By utilizing the in-context learning potential of ChatGPT, we generate an ExTensible Emotional Support dialogue dataset, named ExTES. Following this, we deploy advanced tuning techniques on the LLaMA model, examining the impact of diverse training strategies, ultimately yielding an LLM meticulously optimized for emotional support interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T10:49:18Z)
• Co-constructing Shared Values and Ethical Practice for the Next Generation: Lessons Learned from a Curriculum on Information Ethics [0.0]
  We present the motivation, design, outline, and lessons learned from an online course in scientific integrity, research ethics, and information ethics. The goal of such a training is not so much to equip students, but to make them aware of the impact of their work on society. While we provide conceptual tools, this is more to sustain interest and engage students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T11:09:23Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.