Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020-2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25417v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:37:16 GMT
- Title: Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020-2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization
- Authors: Petter Törnberg,
- Abstract summary: This paper traces how the U.S. social media landscape has shifted across platforms, demographics, and politics.<n>Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter/X have lost ground, while TikTok and Reddit have grown modestly.<n>Political posting remains tightly linked to affective polarization, as the most partisan users are also the most active.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Using nationally representative data from the 2020 and 2024 American National Election Studies (ANES), this paper traces how the U.S. social media landscape has shifted across platforms, demographics, and politics. Overall platform use has declined, with the youngest and oldest Americans increasingly abstaining from social media altogether. Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter/X have lost ground, while TikTok and Reddit have grown modestly, reflecting a more fragmented digital public sphere. Platform audiences have aged and become slightly more educated and diverse. Politically, most platforms have moved toward Republican users while remaining, on balance, Democratic-leaning. Twitter/X has experienced the sharpest shift: posting has flipped nearly 50 percentage points from Democrats to Republicans. Across platforms, political posting remains tightly linked to affective polarization, as the most partisan users are also the most active. As casual users disengage and polarized partisans remain vocal, the online public sphere grows smaller, sharper, and more ideologically extreme.
Related papers
- Adapting Public Personas: A Multimodal Study of U.S. Legislators' Cross-Platform Social Media Strategies [2.604962834477529]
This study examines how U.S. legislators strategically use social media platforms to adapt their public personas.<n>We find that legislators tailor their topics and stances to project distinct public personas on different platforms.<n>Democrats tend to prioritize TikTok, which has a younger user base, while Republicans are more likely to express stronger stances on established platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T22:21:39Z) - Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 USA Presidential Election [1.4304078520604593]
Using a dataset of 239,526 Instagram images, we examine the impact of different content types on user engagement during the 2024 US presidential Elections.
Results show while synthetic content may not increase engagement alone, it mediates how political information is created through highly effective, often absurd, political memes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T17:35:05Z) - Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican
legislative election [55.41644538483948]
We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day.
We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z) - Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity.
The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - An Early Look at the Parler Online Social Network [10.683059193632943]
Parler is an "alternative" social network promoting itself as a service that allows to "speak freely and express yourself openly"
This paper presents a dataset of 183M Parler posts made by 4M users between August 2018 and January 2021, as well as metadata from 13.25M user profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-11T11:23:19Z) - Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online
platforms [2.66512000865131]
We develop a methodology to quantify the positioning of online communities along social dimensions.
Applying our methodology to 5.1B Reddit comments made in 10K communities over 14 years, we measure how the macroscale community structure is organized.
We find Reddit underwent a significant polarization event around the 2016 U.S. presidential election, and remained highly polarized for years afterward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-01T17:59:40Z) - Neutral bots probe political bias on social media [7.41821251168122]
We deploy neutral social bots who start following different news sources on Twitter to probe distinct biases emerging from platform mechanisms versus user interactions.
We find no strong or consistent evidence of political bias in the news feed.
The interactions of conservative accounts are skewed toward the right, whereas liberal accounts are exposed to moderate content shifting their experience toward the political center.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-17T01:20:24Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.