User Misconceptions of LLM-Based Conversational Programming Assistants

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25662v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:23:46 GMT
• Title: User Misconceptions of LLM-Based Conversational Programming Assistants
• Authors: Gabrielle O'Brien, Antonio Pedro Santos Alves, Sebastian Baltes, Grischa Liebel, Mircea Lungu, Marcos Kalinowski,
• Abstract summary: We aim to characterize misconceptions that users of conversational LLM-based assistants may have in programming contexts.<n>Our findings reinforce the need for designing LLM-based tools that more clearly communicate their programming capabilities to users.
• Score: 10.292065384528799
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Programming assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) have become widely available, with conversational assistants like ChatGPT proving particularly accessible to less experienced programmers. However, the varied capabilities of these tools across model versions and the mixed availability of extensions that enable web search, code execution, or retrieval-augmented generation create opportunities for user misconceptions about what systems can and cannot do. Such misconceptions may lead to over-reliance, unproductive practices, or insufficient quality control in LLM-assisted programming. Here, we aim to characterize misconceptions that users of conversational LLM-based assistants may have in programming contexts. Using a two-phase approach, we first brainstorm and catalog user misconceptions that may occur, and then conduct a qualitative analysis to examine whether these conceptual issues surface in naturalistic Python-programming conversations with an LLM-based chatbot drawn from an openly available dataset. Indeed, we see evidence that some users have misplaced expectations about the availability of LLM-based chatbot features like web access, code execution, or non-text output generation. We also see potential evidence for deeper conceptual issues around the scope of information required to debug, validate, and optimize programs. Our findings reinforce the need for designing LLM-based tools that more clearly communicate their programming capabilities to users.

Related papers

• LLM Enhancer: Merged Approach using Vector Embedding for Reducing Large Language Model Hallucinations with External Knowledge [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the capability to generate human like, natural responses across a range of tasks.<n>This paper introduces the LLM ENHANCER system, designed to integrate multiple online sources such as Google, Wikipedia, and DuckDuckGo to enhance data accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T19:27:04Z)
• debug-gym: A Text-Based Environment for Interactive Debugging [55.11603087371956]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly relied upon for coding tasks.<n>We posit that LLMs can benefit from the ability to interactively explore a to gather the information relevant to their task.<n>We present a textual environment, namely debug-gym, for developing LLM-based agents in an interactive coding setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T14:43:28Z)
• Large Language Models for Code Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Challenges, Techniques, Evaluation, and Applications [0.9105696129628794]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in numerous fields.<n>This survey focuses on how LLMs empower users, regardless of their technical background, to use human languages to automatically generate executable code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:17:30Z)
• Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction [55.65312637965779]
  Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone.<n>We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench.<n>We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T23:06:12Z)
• What You Need is What You Get: Theory of Mind for an LLM-Based Code Understanding Assistant [0.0]
  A growing number of tools have used Large Language Models (LLMs) to support developers' code understanding. In this study, we designed an LLM-based conversational assistant that provides a personalized interaction based on inferred user mental state. Our results provide insights for researchers and tool builders who want to create or improve LLM-based conversational assistants to support novices in code understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T14:08:15Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Why and When LLM-Based Assistants Can Go Wrong: Investigating the Effectiveness of Prompt-Based Interactions for Software Help-Seeking [5.755004576310333]
  Large Language Model (LLM) assistants have emerged as potential alternatives to search methods for helping users navigate software. LLM assistants use vast training data from domain-specific texts, software manuals, and code repositories to mimic human-like interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T19:49:58Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Lessons from Building StackSpot AI: A Contextualized AI Coding Assistant [2.268415020650315]
  A new breed of tools, built atop Large Language Models, is emerging. These tools aim to mitigate drawbacks by employing techniques like fine-tuning or enriching user prompts with contextualized information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T10:51:26Z)
• AskIt: Unified Programming Interface for Programming with Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a unique phenomenon known as emergent abilities, demonstrating adeptness across numerous tasks. This paper introduces AskIt, a domain-specific language specifically designed for LLMs. Across 50 tasks, AskIt generated concise prompts, achieving a 16.14 % reduction in prompt length compared to benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T21:44:27Z)
• Using an LLM to Help With Code Understanding [13.53616539787915]
  Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the process of writing code. Our plugin queries OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo model with four high-level requests without the user having to write explicit prompts. We evaluate this system in a user study with 32 participants, which confirms that using our plugin can aid task completion more than web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T00:49:06Z)
• Low-code LLM: Graphical User Interface over Large Language Models [115.08718239772107]
  This paper introduces a novel human-LLM interaction framework, Low-code LLM. It incorporates six types of simple low-code visual programming interactions to achieve more controllable and stable responses. We highlight three advantages of the low-code LLM: user-friendly interaction, controllable generation, and wide applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T09:27:40Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.