Lessons from Building StackSpot AI: A Contextualized AI Coding Assistant

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18450v3
• Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:06:30 GMT
• Title: Lessons from Building StackSpot AI: A Contextualized AI Coding Assistant
• Authors: Gustavo Pinto and Cleidson de Souza and Jo\~ao Batista Neto and Alberto de Souza and Tarc\'isio Gotto and Edward Monteiro
• Abstract summary: A new breed of tools, built atop Large Language Models, is emerging. These tools aim to mitigate drawbacks by employing techniques like fine-tuning or enriching user prompts with contextualized information.
• Score: 2.268415020650315
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With their exceptional natural language processing capabilities, tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Co-Pilot have swiftly become indispensable resources in the software developer's toolkit. While recent studies suggest the potential productivity gains these tools can unlock, users still encounter drawbacks, such as generic or incorrect answers. Additionally, the pursuit of improved responses often leads to extensive prompt engineering efforts, diverting valuable time from writing code that delivers actual value. To address these challenges, a new breed of tools, built atop LLMs, is emerging. These tools aim to mitigate drawbacks by employing techniques like fine-tuning or enriching user prompts with contextualized information. In this paper, we delve into the lessons learned by a software development team venturing into the creation of such a contextualized LLM-based application, using retrieval-based techniques, called CodeBuddy. Over a four-month period, the team, despite lacking prior professional experience in LLM-based applications, built the product from scratch. Following the initial product release, we engaged with the development team responsible for the code generative components. Through interviews and analysis of the application's issue tracker, we uncover various intriguing challenges that teams working on LLM-based applications might encounter. For instance, we found three main group of lessons: LLM-based lessons, User-based lessons, and Technical lessons. By understanding these lessons, software development teams could become better prepared to build LLM-based applications.

Related papers

• LLMs: A Game-Changer for Software Engineers? [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and GPT-4 have emerged as groundbreaking innovations with capabilities that extend far beyond traditional AI applications. Their potential to revolutionize software development has captivated the software engineering (SE) community. This paper argues that LLMs are not just reshaping how software is developed but are redefining the role of developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:14:37Z)
• Codellm-Devkit: A Framework for Contextualizing Code LLMs with Program Analysis Insights [9.414198519543564]
  We present codellm-devkit (hereafter, CLDK'), an open-source library that significantly simplifies the process of performing program analysis. CLDK offers developers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it incredibly easy to provide rich program analysis context to code LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T20:05:59Z)
• Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction [49.256630152684764]
  Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone. We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench. We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T23:06:12Z)
• An Empirical Study on Usage and Perceptions of LLMs in a Software Engineering Project [1.433758865948252]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a leap in artificial intelligence, excelling in tasks using human language(s) In this paper, we analyze the AI-generated code, prompts used for code generation, and the human intervention levels to integrate the code into the code base. Our findings suggest that LLMs can play a crucial role in the early stages of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T14:32:32Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsets [75.64181719386497]
  We present CRAFT, a tool creation and retrieval framework for large language models (LLMs) It creates toolsets specifically curated for the tasks and equips LLMs with a component that retrieves tools from these sets to enhance their capability to solve complex tasks. Our method is designed to be flexible and offers a plug-and-play approach to adapt off-the-shelf LLMs to unseen domains and modalities, without any finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:40:26Z)
• Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Vision [32.34617250991638]
  Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a breakthrough technology in natural language processing and artificial intelligence. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the utilization of LLMs in software testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T08:26:12Z)
• Calculating Originality of LLM Assisted Source Code [0.0]
  We propose a neural network-based tool to determine the original effort (and LLM's contribution) put by students in writing source codes. Our tool is motivated by minimum description length measures like Kolmogorov complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T11:30:46Z)
• CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models [74.22729793816451]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in utilizing tools, but their ability is limited by API availability. We propose CREATOR, a novel framework that enables LLMs to create their own tools using documentation and code realization. We evaluate CREATOR on MATH and TabMWP benchmarks, respectively consisting of challenging math competition problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:51:52Z)
• Low-code LLM: Graphical User Interface over Large Language Models [115.08718239772107]
  This paper introduces a novel human-LLM interaction framework, Low-code LLM. It incorporates six types of simple low-code visual programming interactions to achieve more controllable and stable responses. We highlight three advantages of the low-code LLM: user-friendly interaction, controllable generation, and wide applicability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T09:27:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.