Research Output of Webology Journal (2013-2017): A Scientometric Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27259v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 07:55:16 GMT
• Title: Research Output of Webology Journal (2013-2017): A Scientometric Analysis
• Authors: Muneer Ahmad, M. Sadik Batcha, Basharat Ahmad Wani, Mohammad Idrees Khan, S. Roselin Jahina,
• Abstract summary: Webology is an international peer-reviewed journal in English devoted to the field of the World Wide Web.<n>This paper presents a Scientometric analysis of the Webology Journal.
• Score: 0.2348805691644085
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Webology is an international peer-reviewed journal in English devoted to the field of the World Wide Web and serves as a forum for discussion and experimentation. It serves as a forum for new research in information dissemination and communication processes in general, and in the context of the World Wide Web in particular. This paper presents a Scientometric analysis of the Webology Journal. The paper analyses the pattern of growth of the research output published in the journal, pattern of authorship, author productivity, and subjects covered to the papers over the period (2013-2017). It is found that 62 papers were published during the period of study (2013-2017). The maximum numbers of articles were collaborative in nature. The subject concentration of the journal noted was Social Networking/Web 2.0/Library 2.0 and Scientometrics or Bibliometrics. Iranian researchers contributed the maximum number of articles (37.10%). The study applied standard formula and statistical tools to bring out the factual result.

Related papers

• Publication Trend in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2013-2017: A Scientometric Approach [0.27528170226206433]
  The paper analyses the pattern of growth of the research output published in the journal.<n>The maximum numbers of articles were collaborative in nature.<n>The subject concentration of the journal noted is Scientometrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T05:39:27Z)
• Russian Contribution to Coronary Artery Disease Research: A Scientometric Mapping of Publications [0.3093890460224435]
  This study is based on secondary data extracted from the Science Citation Index (SCI), which is an integral component of the Web of Science.<n>There were 5058 articles by Russian scholars in coronary artery disease during 1990-2019; they preferred to publish in Russian journals.<n>Co-authorship was the norm in coronary artery disease research, with a steady increase in the number of multi-author documents in recent years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T06:06:19Z)
• Reflections from the 2024 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry [68.97388926441971]
  We present the outcomes from the second Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry.<n>The event engaged participants across global hybrid locations, resulting in 34 team submissions.<n>The submissions spanned seven key application areas and demonstrated the diverse utility of LLMs for applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T23:08:01Z)
• SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [97.31347312130119]
  SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning) is a dataset of 137K instruction-following instances for training and evaluation, covering 54 tasks.<n>These tasks span five core scientific literature understanding capabilities: information extraction, summarization, question answering, claim verification, and classification.<n> SciRIFF is unique in being entirely expert-written, high-quality instruction-following dataset for extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across diverse scientific fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Groundbreaking Machine Learning Research: Analyzing highly cited and impactful publications across six decades [1.6442870218029522]
  Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a prominent field of research in computer science and other related fields. It is crucial to understand the landscape of highly cited publications to identify key trends, influential authors, and significant contributions made thus far.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T21:43:22Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• The Impact of Social Media in Learning and Teaching: A Bibliometric-based Citation Analysis [0.4297070083645049]
  The study explored the overall theoretical foundation of social media research involving in learning and studying. International Journal of Management Education is the leading journal in social media in learning and teaching research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T19:32:31Z)
• Graph Neural Networks: a bibliometrics overview [0.6445605125467572]
  The study aims to evaluate GNN research trend, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The most prolific or impactful institutions are found in the United States, China, and Canada. The application of graph convolutional networks and attention mechanism are now among hot topics of GNN research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T07:37:40Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• Early Indicators of Scientific Impact: Predicting Citations with Altmetrics [0.0]
  We use altmetrics to predict the short-term and long-term citations that a scholarly publication could receive. We build various classification and regression models and evaluate their performance, finding neural networks and ensemble models to perform best for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-25T16:25:07Z)
• What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature [85.95906677964815]
  We introduce a new task of disentangled paper summarization, which seeks to generate separate summaries for the paper contributions and the context of the work. We extend the S2ORC corpus of academic articles by adding disentangled "contribution" and "context" reference labels. We propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation protocol which reports the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T02:23:01Z)
• From Standard Summarization to New Tasks and Beyond: Summarization with Manifold Information [77.89755281215079]
  Text summarization is the research area aiming at creating a short and condensed version of the original document. In real-world applications, most of the data is not in a plain text format. This paper focuses on the survey of these new summarization tasks and approaches in the real-world application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T14:59:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.