Publication Trend in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2013-2017: A Scientometric Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04082v1
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 05:39:27 GMT
- Title: Publication Trend in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2013-2017: A Scientometric Approach
- Authors: M Sadik Batcha, S Roselin Jahina, Muneer Ahmad,
- Abstract summary: The paper analyses the pattern of growth of the research output published in the journal.<n>The maximum numbers of articles were collaborative in nature.<n>The subject concentration of the journal noted is Scientometrics.
- Score: 0.27528170226206433
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology (DJLIT) formerly known as DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology is a peer-reviewed, open access, bimonthly journal. This paper presents a Scientometric analysis of the DESIDOC Journal. The paper analyses the pattern of growth of the research output published in the journal, pattern of authorship, author productivity, and, subjects covered to the papers over the period (2013-2017). It is found that 227 papers were published during the period of study (2001-2012). The maximum numbers of articles were collaborative in nature. The subject concentration of the journal noted is Scientometrics. The maximum numbers of articles (65%) have ranged their thought contents between 6 and 10 pages. The study applied standard formula and statistical tools to bring out the factual result.
Related papers
- Russian Contribution to Coronary Artery Disease Research: A Scientometric Mapping of Publications [0.3093890460224435]
This study is based on secondary data extracted from the Science Citation Index (SCI), which is an integral component of the Web of Science.<n>There were 5058 articles by Russian scholars in coronary artery disease during 1990-2019; they preferred to publish in Russian journals.<n>Co-authorship was the norm in coronary artery disease research, with a steady increase in the number of multi-author documents in recent years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T06:06:19Z) - Impact and Relevance of Cognition Journal in the Field of Cognitive Science: An Evaluation [0.27528170226206433]
The study identified top 20 prolific authors, institutions and countries of the journal.<n>The research coverage includes the year wise distribution of articles, authors, institutions, countries and citation analysis of the journal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T11:47:28Z) - Research Output of Webology Journal (2013-2017): A Scientometric Analysis [0.2348805691644085]
Webology is an international peer-reviewed journal in English devoted to the field of the World Wide Web.<n>This paper presents a Scientometric analysis of the Webology Journal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T07:55:16Z) - Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals.
Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z) - Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research.
We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023.
Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z) - A Bibliographic Study on Artificial Intelligence Research: Global
Panorama and Indian Appearance [2.9895330439073406]
The study reveals that neural networks and deep learning are the major topics included in top AI research publications.
The study also investigates the relative position of Indian researchers in terms of AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T05:08:36Z) - Forgotten Knowledge: Examining the Citational Amnesia in NLP [63.13508571014673]
We show how far back in time do we tend to go to cite papers? How has that changed over time, and what factors correlate with this citational attention/amnesia?
We show that around 62% of cited papers are from the immediate five years prior to publication, whereas only about 17% are more than ten years old.
We show that the median age and age diversity of cited papers were steadily increasing from 1990 to 2014, but since then, the trend has reversed, and current NLP papers have an all-time low temporal citation diversity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T18:30:34Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Concrete Materials: A Scientometric View [77.34726150561087]
This chapter aims to uncover the main research interests and knowledge structure of the existing literature on AI for concrete materials.
To begin with, a total of 389 journal articles published from 1990 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science.
Scientometric tools such as keyword co-occurrence analysis and documentation co-citation analysis were adopted to quantify features and characteristics of the research field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-17T18:24:56Z) - Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users.
The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z) - A Graph Convolutional Neural Network based Framework for Estimating
Future Citations Count of Research Articles [0.03937354192623676]
We propose a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) based framework for estimating future research publication citations for both the short-term (1-year) and long-term (for 5-years and 10-years) duration.
We have tested our proposed approach over the AMiner dataset, specifically on research articles from the computer science domain, consisting of more than 0.8 million articles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-11T07:20:53Z) - Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph.
We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains.
Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.