Panprediction: Optimal Predictions for Any Downstream Task and Loss

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27638v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:10:08 GMT
• Title: Panprediction: Optimal Predictions for Any Downstream Task and Loss
• Authors: Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Nika Haghtalab, Daniel Hsu, Brian Lee, Eric Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Supervised learning is classically formulated as training a model to minimize a fixed loss function over a fixed distribution, or task.<n>We formalize a mathematical framework for this paradigm, which we call panprediction, and study its statistical complexity.<n>We show that simultaneously minimizing infinitely many losses on infinitely many tasks can be as statistically easy as minimizing one loss on one task.
• Score: 22.59167297839645
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Supervised learning is classically formulated as training a model to minimize a fixed loss function over a fixed distribution, or task. However, an emerging paradigm instead views model training as extracting enough information from data so that the model can be used to minimize many losses on many downstream tasks. We formalize a mathematical framework for this paradigm, which we call panprediction, and study its statistical complexity. Formally, panprediction generalizes omniprediction and sits upstream from multi-group learning, which respectively focus on predictions that generalize to many downstream losses or many downstream tasks, but not both. Concretely, we design algorithms that learn deterministic and randomized panpredictors with $\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^3)$ and $\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)$ samples, respectively. Our results demonstrate that under mild assumptions, simultaneously minimizing infinitely many losses on infinitely many tasks can be as statistically easy as minimizing one loss on one task. Along the way, we improve the best known sample complexity guarantee of deterministic omniprediction by a factor of $1/\varepsilon$, and match all other known sample complexity guarantees of omniprediction and multi-group learning. Our key technical ingredient is a nearly lossless reduction from panprediction to a statistically efficient notion of calibration, called step calibration.

Related papers

• Sample-Efficient Omniprediction for Proper Losses [7.615840544913577]
  We consider the problem of constructing probabilistic predictions that lead to accurate decisions when employed by downstream users to inform actions.<n>For a single decision maker, designing an optimal predictor is equivalent to minimizing a proper loss function corresponding to the negative utility of that individual.<n>For multiple decision makers, our problem can be viewed as a variant of omniprediction in which the goal is to design a single predictor that simultaneously minimizes multiple losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T17:49:05Z)
• Probably Approximately Precision and Recall Learning [60.00180898830079]
  A key challenge in machine learning is the prevalence of one-sided feedback.<n>We introduce a Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework in which hypotheses are set functions that map each input to a set of labels.<n>We develop new algorithms that learn from positive data alone, achieving optimal sample complexity in the realizable case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:21:07Z)
• Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
  Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions.<n>We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance.<n>Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z)
• Probabilistic Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition [78.70453964041718]
  Longtailed distributions frequently emerge in real-world data, where a large number of minority categories contain a limited number of samples. Recent investigations have revealed that supervised contrastive learning exhibits promising potential in alleviating the data imbalance. We propose a novel probabilistic contrastive (ProCo) learning algorithm that estimates the data distribution of the samples from each class in the feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T13:44:49Z)
• Sample-Efficient Linear Representation Learning from Non-IID Non-Isotropic Data [4.971690889257356]
  We introduce an adaptation of the alternating minimization-descent scheme proposed by Collins and Nayer and Vaswani. We show that vanilla alternating-minimization descent fails catastrophically even for iid, but mildly non-isotropic data. Our analysis unifies and generalizes prior work, and provides a flexible framework for a wider range of applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T17:56:20Z)
• Task-Robust Pre-Training for Worst-Case Downstream Adaptation [62.05108162160981]
  Pre-training has achieved remarkable success when transferred to downstream tasks. This paper considers pre-training a model that guarantees a uniformly good performance over the downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:43:23Z)
• Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishability [11.709566373491619]
  We present a new perspective on convex loss and the recent notion of Omniprediction. By design, Loss OI implies omniprediction in a direct and intuitive manner. We show that Loss OI for the important set of losses arising from Generalized Models, without requiring full multicalibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T22:25:27Z)
• Omnipredictors [19.735769148626588]
  Loss minimization is a dominant paradigm in machine learning. We introduce the notion of an ($mathcalL,mathcalC$)-omnipredictor, which could be used to optimize any loss in a family. We show that such "loss-oblivious'' learning is feasible through a connection to multicalibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T23:28:49Z)
• On Misspecification in Prediction Problems and Robustness via Improper Learning [23.64462813525688]
  We show that for a broad class of loss functions and parametric families of distributions, the regret of playing a "proper" predictor has lower bound scaling at least as $sqrtgamma n$. We exhibit instances in which this is unimprovable even over the family of all learners that may play distributions in the convex hull of the parametric family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T17:54:08Z)
• Learning by Minimizing the Sum of Ranked Range [58.24935359348289]
  We introduce the sum of ranked range (SoRR) as a general approach to form learning objectives. A ranked range is a consecutive sequence of sorted values of a set of real numbers. We explore two applications in machine learning of the minimization of the SoRR framework, namely the AoRR aggregate loss for binary classification and the TKML individual loss for multi-label/multi-class classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T01:58:32Z)
• Machine Learning's Dropout Training is Distributionally Robust Optimal [10.937094979510212]
  This paper shows that dropout training in Generalized Linear Models provides out-of-sample expected loss guarantees. It also provides a novel, parallelizable, Unbiased Multi-Level Monte Carlo algorithm to speed-up the implementation of dropout training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-13T23:13:28Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.