Challenges in Credit Assignment for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Open Agent Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27659v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:30:32 GMT
• Title: Challenges in Credit Assignment for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Open Agent Systems
• Authors: Alireza Saleh Abadi, Leen-Kiat Soh,
• Abstract summary: This report focuses on the interplay between openness and the credit assignment problem (CAP)<n>CAP involves determining the contribution of individual agents to the overall system performance.<n>Traditional credit assignment methods often assume static agent populations, fixed and pre-defined tasks, and stationary types, making them inadequate for open systems.
• Score: 0.19336815376402716
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving field of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), understanding the dynamics of open systems is crucial. Openness in MARL refers to the dynam-ic nature of agent populations, tasks, and agent types with-in a system. Specifically, there are three types of openness as reported in (Eck et al. 2023) [2]: agent openness, where agents can enter or leave the system at any time; task openness, where new tasks emerge, and existing ones evolve or disappear; and type openness, where the capabil-ities and behaviors of agents change over time. This report provides a conceptual and empirical review, focusing on the interplay between openness and the credit assignment problem (CAP). CAP involves determining the contribution of individual agents to the overall system performance, a task that becomes increasingly complex in open environ-ments. Traditional credit assignment (CA) methods often assume static agent populations, fixed and pre-defined tasks, and stationary types, making them inadequate for open systems. We first conduct a conceptual analysis, in-troducing new sub-categories of openness to detail how events like agent turnover or task cancellation break the assumptions of environmental stationarity and fixed team composition that underpin existing CAP methods. We then present an empirical study using representative temporal and structural algorithms in an open environment. The results demonstrate that openness directly causes credit misattribution, evidenced by unstable loss functions and significant performance degradation.

Related papers

• Just Ask: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs [65.6660735371212]
  We present textbftextscJustAsk, a framework that autonomously discovers effective extraction strategies through interaction alone.<n>It formulates extraction as an online exploration problem, using Upper Confidence Bound--based strategy selection and a hierarchical skill space spanning atomic probes and high-level orchestration.<n>Our results expose system prompts as a critical yet largely unprotected attack surface in modern agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T03:53:25Z)
• AgentIF-OneDay: A Task-level Instruction-Following Benchmark for General AI Agents in Daily Scenarios [49.90735676070039]
  The capacity of AI agents to effectively handle tasks of increasing duration and complexity continues to grow.<n>We argue that current evaluations prioritize increasing task difficulty without sufficiently addressing the diversity of agentic tasks.<n>We propose AgentIF-OneDay, aimed at determining whether general users can utilize natural language instructions and AI agents to complete a diverse array of daily tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T13:49:18Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Beyond Monolithic Architectures: A Multi-Agent Search and Knowledge Optimization Framework for Agentic Search [56.78490647843876]
  Agentic search has emerged as a promising paradigm for complex information seeking by enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to interleave reasoning with tool use.<n>We propose bfM-ASK, a framework that explicitly decouples agentic search into two complementary roles: Search Behavior Agents, which plan and execute search actions, and Knowledge Management Agents, which aggregate, filter, and maintain a compact internal context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T08:13:27Z)
• A Survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models [84.18778056010629]
  We present a comprehensive survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models (Agentic MLLMs)<n>We explore the emerging paradigm of agentic MLLMs, delineating their conceptual foundations and distinguishing characteristics from conventional MLLM-based agents.<n>To further accelerate research in this area for the community, we compile open-source training frameworks, training and evaluation datasets for developing agentic MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T04:07:01Z)
• MAGIC-MASK: Multi-Agent Guided Inter-Agent Collaboration with Mask-Based Explainability for Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose a mathematically grounded framework, MAGIC-MASK, that extends perturbation-based explanation to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning.<n>Our method integrates Proximal Policy Optimization, adaptive epsilon-greedy exploration, and lightweight inter-agent collaboration.<n>This collaboration enables each agent to perform saliency-guided masking and share reward-based insights with peers, reducing the time required for critical state discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T20:53:28Z)
• Diagnose, Localize, Align: A Full-Stack Framework for Reliable LLM Multi-Agent Systems under Instruction Conflicts [75.20929587906228]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have rapidly advanced collaborative reasoning, tool use, and role-specialized coordination in complex tasks.<n>However, reliability-critical deployment remains hindered by a systemic failure mode: hierarchical compliance under instruction conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T08:43:34Z)
• The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [103.78397717362797]
  The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z)
• Emergence of Hierarchies in Multi-Agent Self-Organizing Systems Pursuing a Joint Objective [12.899919591015912]
  Multi-agent self-organizing systems (MASOS) exhibit key characteristics including scalability, adaptability, flexibility, and robustness.<n>This paper focuses on the emergence of dependency hierarchies during task execution.<n>By calculating the gradients of each agent's actions in relation to the states of other agents, the inter-agent dependencies are quantified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T06:50:03Z)
• A Survey on AgentOps: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directions [25.00082531560766]
  This paper introduces a novel and comprehensive operational framework for agent systems, dubbed Agent System Operations (AgentOps)<n>We provide detailed definitions and explanations of its four key stages: monitoring, anomaly detection, root cause analysis, and resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:59:36Z)
• SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents [58.21223208538351]
  This work explores the security issues surrounding mobile multimodal agents.<n>It attempts to construct a risk discrimination mechanism by incorporating behavioral sequence information.<n>It also designs an automated assisted assessment scheme based on a large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T15:10:00Z)
• Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay [16.179801770737892]
  This paper proposes a new paradigm called AgentRR (Agent Record & Replay), which introduces the classical record-and-replay mechanism into AI agent frameworks.<n>We detail a multi-level experience abstraction method and a check function mechanism in AgentRR.<n>In addition, we explore multiple application modes of AgentRR, including user-recorded task demonstration, large-small model collaboration and privacy-aware agent execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T10:33:14Z)
• Synthesizing Evolving Symbolic Representations for Autonomous Systems [2.4233709516962785]
  This paper presents an open-ended learning system able to synthesize from scratch its experience into a PPDDL representation and update it over time. The system explores the environment and iteratively: (a) discover options, (b) explore the environment using options, (c) abstract the knowledge collected and (d) plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T07:23:26Z)
• Pessimism meets VCG: Learning Dynamic Mechanism Design via Offline Reinforcement Learning [114.36124979578896]
  We design a dynamic mechanism using offline reinforcement learning algorithms. Our algorithm is based on the pessimism principle and only requires a mild assumption on the coverage of the offline data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T05:44:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.