HIP-LLM: A Hierarchical Imprecise Probability Approach to Reliability Assessment of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00527v1
• Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 12:04:30 GMT
• Title: HIP-LLM: A Hierarchical Imprecise Probability Approach to Reliability Assessment of Large Language Models
• Authors: Robab Aghazadeh-Chakherlou, Qing Guo, Siddartha Khastgir, Peter Popov, Xiaoge Zhang, Xingyu Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse domains, raising the need for rigorous reliability assessment methods.<n>This paper introduces HIP-LLM, a Hierarchical Imprecise Probability framework for modeling and inferring LLM reliability.<n> experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that HIP-LLM offers a more accurate and standardized reliability characterization than existing benchmark and state-of-the-art approaches.
• Score: 10.864272918260754
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse domains, raising the need for rigorous reliability assessment methods. Existing benchmark-based evaluations primarily offer descriptive statistics of model accuracy over datasets, providing limited insight into the probabilistic behavior of LLMs under real operational conditions. This paper introduces HIP-LLM, a Hierarchical Imprecise Probability framework for modeling and inferring LLM reliability. Building upon the foundations of software reliability engineering, HIP-LLM defines LLM reliability as the probability of failure-free operation over a specified number of future tasks under a given Operational Profile (OP). HIP-LLM represents dependencies across (sub-)domains hierarchically, enabling multi-level inference from subdomain to system-level reliability. HIP-LLM embeds imprecise priors to capture epistemic uncertainty and incorporates OPs to reflect usage contexts. It derives posterior reliability envelopes that quantify uncertainty across priors and data. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that HIP-LLM offers a more accurate and standardized reliability characterization than existing benchmark and state-of-the-art approaches. A publicly accessible repository of HIP-LLM is provided.

Related papers

• Trust in One Round: Confidence Estimation for Large Language Models via Structural Signals [13.89434979851652]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in domains where errors carry high social, scientific, or safety costs.<n>We present Structural Confidence, a single-pass, model-agnostic framework that enhances output correctness prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T02:35:59Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Stage-wise Benchmarking of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking [64.97768177044355]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world fact-checking systems.<n>We present FactArena, a fully automated arena-style evaluation framework.<n>Our analyses reveal significant discrepancies between static claim-verification accuracy and end-to-end fact-checking competence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T02:51:56Z)
• Reliable LLM-Based Edge-Cloud-Expert Cascades for Telecom Knowledge Systems [54.916243942641444]
  Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as key enablers of automation in domains such as telecommunications.<n>We study an edge-cloud-expert cascaded LLM-based knowledge system that supports decision-making through a question-and-answer pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T03:10:09Z)
• Token-Level Marginalization for Multi-Label LLM Classifiers [0.0]
  Three novel token-level probability estimation approaches are proposed.<n>The aim is to enhance model interpretability and accuracy, and evaluate the generalizability of this framework across different instruction-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T10:43:26Z)
• MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
  Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z)
• Confidence in Large Language Model Evaluation: A Bayesian Approach to Limited-Sample Challenges [13.526258635654882]
  This study introduces a Bayesian approach for large language models (LLMs) capability assessment.<n>We treat model capabilities as latent variables and leverage a curated query set to induce discriminative responses.<n> Experimental evaluations with GPT-series models demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior discrimination compared to conventional evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T04:24:50Z)
• Understanding Multimodal LLMs Under Distribution Shifts: An Information-Theoretic Approach [33.463823493423554]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities but struggle under distribution shifts.<n>We argue that establishing a formal framework that can characterize and quantify the risk of MLLMs is necessary to ensure the safe and reliable application of MLLMs in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T22:06:56Z)
• Ranked from Within: Ranking Large Multimodal Models Without Labels [73.96543593298426]
  We show that uncertainty scores derived from softmax distributions provide a robust basis for ranking models across various tasks.<n>This facilitates the ranking of LMMs on unlabeled data, providing a practical approach for selecting models for diverse target domains without requiring manual annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T13:05:43Z)
• Amortized Bayesian Multilevel Models [9.831471158899644]
  Multilevel models (MLMs) are a central building block of the Bayesian workflow.<n>MLMs pose significant computational challenges, often rendering their estimation and evaluation intractable within reasonable time constraints.<n>Recent advances in simulation-based inference offer promising solutions for addressing complex probabilistic models using deep generative networks.<n>We explore a family of neural network architectures that leverage the probabilistic factorization of multilevel models to facilitate efficient neural network training and subsequent near-instant posterior inference on unseen datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T17:11:04Z)
• Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-Tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMs [10.494477811252034]
  Fine-tuning multiplicity can arise in Tabular LLMs on classification tasks.<n>Our work formalizes this unique challenge of fine-tuning multiplicity in Tabular LLMs.<n>We propose a novel measure to quantify consistency of individual predictions without expensive model retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T22:22:09Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• BIRD: A Trustworthy Bayesian Inference Framework for Large Language Models [52.46248487458641]
  Predictive models often need to work with incomplete information in real-world tasks.<n>Current large language models (LLMs) are insufficient for accurate estimations.<n>We propose BIRD, a novel probabilistic inference framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T20:17:23Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.