Can Large Language Models Detect Real-World Android Software Compliance Violations?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00624v1
• Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 16:58:33 GMT
• Title: Can Large Language Models Detect Real-World Android Software Compliance Violations?
• Abstract summary: Current models struggle to detect compliance violations in Android applications across diverse legal frameworks.<n>We propose emphCompliBench, a novel evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' ability to detect compliance violations.<n>Experiments with six models, including GPT-4O and Claude-3.5, show emphCompliBench improves compliance detection.
• Score: 3.7278558081099544
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed software engineering, showing promise in tasks like code generation, bug detection, and compliance checking. However, current models struggle to detect compliance violations in Android applications across diverse legal frameworks. We propose \emph{CompliBench}, a novel evaluation framework for assessing LLMs' ability to detect compliance violations under regulations like LGPD, PDPA, and PIPEDA. The framework defines two tasks: Task 1 evaluates \emph{retrieval and localization} at file, module, and line granularities, and Task 2 assesses \emph{multi-label judgment} for code snippets. These tasks mirror the audit process, where auditors locate problematic code and determine implicated provisions. Traditional metrics fail to capture important aspects like cross-granularity stability and jurisdictional consistency. Thus, we introduce stability-aware composites (SGS, RCS, CRGS, and OCS) for a more comprehensive assessment. Experiments with six models, including GPT-4O and Claude-3.5, show \emph{CompliBench} improves compliance detection, with Claude-3.5-sonnet-20241022 achieving the highest OCS score (0.3295), and Gemini-2.5-pro the lowest (0.0538). This work demonstrates \emph{CompliBench}'s potential for improving LLM performance in compliance tasks and provides a foundation for future tools aligned with data protection standards. Our project is available at https://github.com/Haoyi-Zhang/CompliBench.

Related papers

• SCDBench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Smart Contract Decompilers [55.39407031861402]
  We introduce SCDBench, a dataset and benchmark methodology for smart contract decompilation.<n>The dataset contains 600 real-world Solidity contracts with paired bytecode inputs, ground-truth source code, and replayable semantic checkpoints.<n>We evaluate Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.3-Codex, and GLM-5 in a zero-shot decompilation setting, including GLM-5 variants with and without extended reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T20:08:47Z)
• Using Semantic Distance to Estimate Uncertainty in LLM-Based Code Generation [1.1470070927586018]
  LLMs show strong performance in code generation, but their outputs lack correctness guarantees.<n>We introduce a taxonomy that disentangles these choices and reveals a missing design point: semantic distance-aware uncertainty estimation.<n>Our metrics provide strong proxies for correctness, and consistently outperform state-of-the-art sample-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T16:02:54Z)
• RealSec-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Secure Code Generation in Real-World Repositories [58.32028251925354]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, but their proficiency in producing secure code remains a critical, under-explored area.<n>We introduce RealSec-bench, a new benchmark for secure code generation meticulously constructed from real-world, high-risk Java repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T08:29:01Z)
• Environment-Aware Code Generation: How far are We? [52.69113158357018]
  It is unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably generate executable code tailored to a user's specific environment.<n>We present the first systematic study of Environment-Aware Code Generation (EACG), where generated code must be functionally correct and directly executable under arbitrary software configurations.<n>Our results show that current LLMs struggle with environment-specific code generation, while our adaptations improve environment compatibility and executability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T04:58:15Z)
• Do Large Language Models Respect Contracts? Evaluating and Enforcing Contract-Adherence in Code Generation [11.445615378917578]
  PACT is a program assessment and contract-adherence evaluation framework.<n>It provides a comprehensive test-suite corpus focused on contract violations.<n>It enables a systematic analysis of code generation under varied prompting conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T01:12:37Z)
• Probing Pre-trained Language Models on Code Changes: Insights from ReDef, a High-Confidence Just-in-Time Defect Prediction Dataset [0.0]
  We present ReDef, a high-confidence benchmark of function-level modifications curated from 22 large-scale C/C++ projects.<n>Defective cases are anchored by revert commits, while clean cases are validated through post-hoc history checks.<n>This pipeline yields 3,164 defective and 10,268 clean modifications, offering substantially more reliable labels than prior existing resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T07:07:11Z)
• LLM-GUARD: Large Language Model-Based Detection and Repair of Bugs and Security Vulnerabilities in C++ and Python [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4, Claude 3, and LLaMA 4 are increasingly embedded in software/application development.<n>This study presents a systematic, empirical evaluation of these three leading LLMs using a benchmark of programming errors, classic security flaws, and advanced, production-grade bugs in C++ and Python.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T14:30:24Z)
• SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving [90.32201622392137]
  We present SwingArena, a competitive evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike traditional static benchmarks, SwingArena models the collaborative process of software by pairing LLMs as iterations, who generate patches, and reviewers, who create test cases and verify the patches through continuous integration (CI) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:28:02Z)
• VERINA: Benchmarking Verifiable Code Generation [46.582574591358735]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated in software development.<n> Ensuring correctness in LLM-generated code remains challenging.<n>Verifiable code generation offers a promising path to address this limitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T06:12:52Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal [64.9938658716425]
  SORRY-Bench is a proposed benchmark for evaluating large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests.<n>First, existing methods often use coarse-grained taxonomy of unsafe topics, and are over-representing some fine-grained topics.<n>Second, linguistic characteristics and formatting of prompts are often overlooked, like different languages, dialects, and more -- which are only implicitly considered in many evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:56:07Z)
• SALLM: Security Assessment of Generated Code [0.5137309756089941]
  This paper describes SALLM, a framework to benchmark Large Language Models' abilities to generate secure code systematically. The framework has three major components: a novel dataset of security-centric Python prompts, assessment techniques to evaluate the generated code, and novel metrics to evaluate the models' performance from the perspective of secure code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T22:46:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.