None To Optima in Few Shots: Bayesian Optimization with MDP Priors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01006v1
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:53:17 GMT
- Title: None To Optima in Few Shots: Bayesian Optimization with MDP Priors
- Authors: Diantong Li, Kyunghyun Cho, Chong Liu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Procedure-inFormed BO (ProfBO) algorithm, which solves black-box optimization with remarkably few function evaluations.<n>ProfBO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods by achieving high-quality tuning solutions with significantly fewer evaluations.
- Score: 40.4319486959011
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Bayesian Optimization (BO) is an efficient tool for optimizing black-box functions, but its theoretical guarantees typically hold in the asymptotic regime. In many critical real-world applications such as drug discovery or materials design, where each evaluation can be very costly and time-consuming, BO becomes impractical for many evaluations. In this paper, we introduce the Procedure-inFormed BO (ProfBO) algorithm, which solves black-box optimization with remarkably few function evaluations. At the heart of our algorithmic design are Markov Decision Process (MDP) priors that model optimization trajectories from related source tasks, thereby capturing procedural knowledge on efficient optimization. We embed these MDP priors into a prior-fitted neural network and employ model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation to new target tasks. Experiments on real-world Covid and Cancer benchmarks and hyperparameter tuning tasks demonstrate that ProfBO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods by achieving high-quality solutions with significantly fewer evaluations, making it ready for practical deployment.
Related papers
- Optimizing the Unknown: Black Box Bayesian Optimization with Energy-Based Model and Reinforcement Learning [42.508822373669936]
Black-Box Optimization (BBO) has achieved success across various scientific and engineering domains.<n>We propose the Reinforced Energy-Based Model for Bayesian Optimization (REBMBO), which integrates Gaussian Processes (GP) for local guidance with an Energy-Based Model (EBM) to capture global structural information.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks, confirming the superior performance of REBMBO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T12:36:49Z) - BOOST: Bayesian Optimization with Optimal Kernel and Acquisition Function Selection Technique [1.0499611180329804]
We propose BOOST, a novel framework that automates the selection of kernel-acquisition pairs.<n>BOOST predicts the performance of various kernel-acquisition pairs and identifies the most promising pair before committing to expensive evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T12:08:12Z) - Poisson Process for Bayesian Optimization [126.51200593377739]
We propose a ranking-based surrogate model based on the Poisson process and introduce an efficient BO framework, namely Poisson Process Bayesian Optimization (PoPBO)
Compared to the classic GP-BO method, our PoPBO has lower costs and better robustness to noise, which is verified by abundant experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T02:54:50Z) - Polynomial-Model-Based Optimization for Blackbox Objectives [0.0]
Black-box optimization seeks to find optimal parameters for systems such that a pre-defined objective function is minimized.
PMBO is a novel blackbox that finds the minimum by fitting a surrogate to the objective function.
PMBO is benchmarked against other state-of-the-art algorithms for a given set of artificial, analytical functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T14:11:03Z) - Provably Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Estimation [44.53678257757108]
We propose a new BO method that can sub-linearly converge to the objective function's global optimum.
Our method uses a multi-armed bandit technique (EXP3) to add random data points to the BO process.
We demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on various synthetic and real-world problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-12T03:35:45Z) - An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on
AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives.
We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD)
We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z) - Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory.
We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures.
We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z) - Pre-training helps Bayesian optimization too [49.28382118032923]
We seek an alternative practice for setting functional priors.
In particular, we consider the scenario where we have data from similar functions that allow us to pre-train a tighter distribution a priori.
Our results show that our method is able to locate good hyper parameters at least 3 times more efficiently than the best competing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-07T04:42:54Z) - Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based
Optimization [78.19085445065845]
Computational design problems arise in a number of settings, from synthetic biology to computer architectures.
We propose a method that learns a model of the objective function that lower bounds the actual value of the ground-truth objective on out-of-distribution inputs.
COMs are simple to implement and outperform a number of existing methods on a wide range of MBO problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T17:55:28Z) - Revisiting Bayesian Optimization in the light of the COCO benchmark [1.4467794332678539]
This article reports a large investigation about the effects on the performance of (Gaussian process based) BO of common and less common design choices.
The code developed for this study makes the new version (v2.1.1) of the R package DiceOptim available on CRAN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T19:45:18Z) - Meta Learning Black-Box Population-Based Optimizers [0.0]
We propose the use of meta-learning to infer population-based blackbox generalizations.
We show that the meta-loss function encourages a learned algorithm to alter its search behavior so that it can easily fit into a new context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-05T08:13:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.