EPR Revisited: Context-Indexed Elements of Reality and Operational Completeness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01930v2
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 06:49:02 GMT
• Title: EPR Revisited: Context-Indexed Elements of Reality and Operational Completeness
• Authors: Mikołaj Sienicki, Krzysztof Sienicki,
• Abstract summary: We reframe the EPR argument through an operational lens, replacing the notion of fixed "elements of reality"<n>This move deliberately sidesteps the assumption of context-independent values for incompatible observables.<n>We offer examples: the qubit singlet scenario using Pauli settings and CJWR thresholds, a continuous-variable case based on the Reid criteria, and a counterexample in the spirit of the PR box.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We reframe the EPR argument through an operational lens, replacing the notion of fixed "elements of reality" with context-indexed conditional states - what's often referred to as a measurement assemblage. This move deliberately sidesteps the assumption of context-independent values for incompatible observables. Our updated version of the Reality Criterion works like this: if Alice measures observable x and obtains outcome a, then Bob's system must adopt a conditional state that ensures the corresponding outcome for that specific context. Crucially, we also assume operational completeness - a condition that quantum mechanics satisfies when we're dealing with quantum-reachable assemblages. Now, in any theory where one party cannot signal to the other (so-called one-sided no-signaling theories), perfect predictions do support drawing context-indexed inferences. But - and this is key - they don't legitimize assigning fixed values across all contexts. We rigorously demonstrate this distinction. To ground the argument, we offer examples: the qubit singlet scenario using Pauli settings and CJWR thresholds, a continuous-variable case based on the Reid criteria, and a counterexample in the spirit of the PR box, which highlights the boundaries of what quantum theory can actually reach.

Related papers

• Actual and weak actual values in Bohmian mechanics [0.8460698440162889]
  A fundamental question in Bohmian mechanics concerns whether observables other than position possess definite values.<n>We introduce a condition of operational robustness as a criterion for when an observable can be attributed an actual value in a given Bohmian state.<n>We define a weak actual value as a derived theoretical construct to characterize the local average behavior of an observable along a trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T03:38:20Z)
• Deterministic Underlying States are incompatible with a Counterfactual account of Lüders' rule [0.0]
  We argue that a counterfactual account of L"uders' rule rules out underlying-state models of quantum mechanics.<n>This incompatibility arises because the counterfactual update requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T20:26:37Z)
• Quantum set theory: Equality and order of internal reals defined through different quantum conditionals [0.0]
  We show how the form of the conditional follows from an analysis of experimental concepts in quantum theory. For each of the above conditionals, we previously introduced an interpretation of quantum set theory. We show that the externally defined set of the internal reals is identical for each choice among the above three conditionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T00:56:43Z)
• Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations [0.0]
  In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms. We provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to build a conceptual-operational bridge between formalism and quantum phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T10:17:49Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Operational Quantum Frames: An operational approach to quantum reference frames [0.0]
  We introduce an operational notion of a quantum reference frame -- which is defined as a quantum system equipped with a covariant positive operator-valued measure (POVM) We show that when the frame is localizable, meaning that it allows for states that give rise to a highly localized probability distribution of the frame's observable, by restricting the relative description upon such localized frame preparation we recover the usual, non-relational formalism of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T09:30:35Z)
• Real quantum operations and state transformations [44.99833362998488]
  Resource theory of imaginarity provides a useful framework to understand the role of complex numbers. In the first part of this article, we study the properties of real'' (quantum) operations in single-party and bipartite settings. In the second part of this article, we focus on the problem of single copy state transformation via real quantum operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T01:08:16Z)
• Conditional probability framework for entanglement and its decoupling from tensor product structure [0.0]
  In Schr"odinger's words, this is entanglement of knowledge which can be extracted via conditional measurements. We restrict considerations to perfect conditional correlations (PCC) induced by measurements. One of our aims is to decouple the notion of entanglement from the compound systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T06:30:01Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings [68.8204255655161]
  We show that the trinity' of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector. We ascribe the time according to the clock subsystem to a POVM which is covariant with respect to its (quadratic) Hamiltonian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T16:12:24Z)
• Quantum-secure message authentication via blind-unforgeability [74.7729810207187]
  We propose a natural definition of unforgeability against quantum adversaries called blind unforgeability. This notion defines a function to be predictable if there exists an adversary who can use "partially blinded" access to predict values. We show the suitability of blind unforgeability for supporting canonical constructions and reductions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-03-10T05:31:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.