AI Agents with Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02841v1
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 08:10:37 GMT
- Title: AI Agents with Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials
- Authors: Sandro Rodriguez Garzon, Awid Vaziry, Enis Mert Kuzu, Dennis Enrique Gehrmann, Buse Varkan, Alexander Gaballa, Axel Küpper,
- Abstract summary: This article presents a prototypical multi-agent system, where each agent is endowed with a self-sovereign digital identity.<n>It combines a unique and ledger-anchored Decentralized Identifier (DID) of an agent with a set of third-party issued Verifiable Credentials (VCs)<n>It enables agents at the start of a dialog to prove ownership of their self-controlled DIDs for authentication purposes and to establish various cross-domain trust relationships.
- Score: 32.505127447635864
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: LLM-based AI agents still lack the technical means to automatically build nuanced and differentiated trust in other agents at the beginning of an agent-to-agent dialogue. But autonomous and interoperable trust establishing becomes a fundamental prerequisite once agents start to operate beyond isolated environments and engage in dialogues across individual or organizational boundaries. A promising way to fill this gap in Agentic AI is to equip agents with long-lived digital identities and introduce tamper-proof and flexible identity-bound attestations of agents, provisioned by commonly trusted third parties and designed for cross-domain verifiability. This article presents a conceptual framework and a prototypical multi-agent system, where each agent is endowed with a self-sovereign digital identity. It combines a unique and ledger-anchored Decentralized Identifier (DID) of an agent with a set of third-party issued Verifiable Credentials (VCs). This enables agents at the start of a dialog to prove ownership of their self-controlled DIDs for authentication purposes and to establish various cross-domain trust relationships through the spontaneous exchange of their self-hosted DID-bound VCs. A comprehensive evaluation of the prototypical implementation demonstrates technical feasibility but also reveals limitations once an agent's LLM is in sole charge to control the respective security procedures.
Related papers
- OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z) - Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agents [53.55621104327779]
Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents extend capabilities by enabling access to tools such as data sources, APIs, search engines, code sandboxes, and even other agents.<n>LLMs may invoke unintended tool interactions and introduce risks, such as leaking sensitive data or overwriting critical records.<n>Current approaches to mitigate these risks, such as model-based safeguards, enhance agents' reliability but cannot guarantee system safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T21:31:38Z) - Binding Agent ID: Unleashing the Power of AI Agents with accountability and credibility [46.323590135279126]
BAID (Binding Agent ID) is a comprehensive identity infrastructure establishing verifiable user-code binding.<n>We implement and evaluate a complete prototype system, demonstrating the practical feasibility of blockchain-based identity management and zkVM-based authentication protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-19T13:01:54Z) - Context Lineage Assurance for Non-Human Identities in Critical Multi-Agent Systems [0.08316523707191924]
We introduce a cryptographically grounded mechanism for lineage verification, anchored in append-only Merkle tree structures.<n>Unlike traditional A2A models that primarily secure point-to-point interactions, our approach enables both agents and external verifiers to cryptographically validate multi-hop provenance.<n>In parallel, we augment the A2A agent card to incorporate explicit identity verification primitives, enabling both peer agents and human approvers to authenticate the legitimacy of NHI representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T20:59:51Z) - Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective [9.707223291705601]
The proliferation of autonomous AI agents represents a paradigmatic shift from traditional web architectures toward collaborative intelligent systems.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework addressing the fundamental infrastructure requirements for secure, trustworthy, and interoperable AI agent ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T05:27:27Z) - A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control [7.228060525494563]
This paper posits the imperative for a novel Agentic AI IAM framework.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework built upon rich, verifiable Agent Identities (IDs)<n>We also explore how Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable privacy-preserving attribute disclosure and verifiable policy compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T20:21:55Z) - Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z) - LOKA Protocol: A Decentralized Framework for Trustworthy and Ethical AI Agent Ecosystems [0.0]
We present the novel LOKA Protocol (Layered Orchestration for Knowledgeful Agents), a unified, systems-level architecture for building ethically governed, interoperable AI agent ecosystems.<n>LOKA introduces a proposed Universal Agent Identity Layer (UAIL) for decentralized, verifiable identity; intent-centric communication protocols for semantic coordination across diverse agents; and a Decentralized Ethical Consensus Protocol (DECP) that could enable agents to make context-aware decisions grounded in shared ethical baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T06:51:35Z) - Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents [4.679384754914167]
We introduce a novel framework for authenticated, authorized, and auditable delegation of authority to AI agents.<n>We propose a framework for translating flexible, natural language permissions into auditable access control configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-16T17:11:21Z) - Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents [61.33974108405561]
We introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems.
This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process.
We present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:57:02Z) - Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents.
We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations.
IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.