Legal Entanglement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03982v1
• Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 02:13:03 GMT
• Title: Legal Entanglement
• Authors: Nicholas Godfrey, Ted Sichelman,
• Abstract summary: Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which two physical systems are correlated in such a way that they appear to instantaneously affect one another.<n>Several legal scholars have metaphorically described 'entangled' legal concepts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which two physical systems are correlated in such a way that they appear to instantaneously affect one another, regardless of the distance between them. As commonly understood, Bell's Theorem famously demonstrates that any causal explanation of entanglement must discard either locality (the principle that nothing, including information, travels faster than light) or classical notions of realism (or both). Drawing on this concept, several legal scholars have metaphorically described 'entangled' legal concepts. For instance, if a state's highest court redefines the concept of 'foreseeability' in negligence law, this redefinition alters the concept of 'reasonable care' immediately in the eyes of the law. Godfrey (2024) is the first work to mathematically model entangled legal concepts, particularly in the context of legal interpretation. Here, we extend the quantification to the formulation and delineation of law (lawmaking) and the adjudication of law (judgment). In so doing, we connect legal entanglement to Sichelman's (2022) work on legal entropy, complexity, and the informational content of law. In addition to quantifying entanglement across various legal contexts, our approach provides broader insights. For example, it offers a more comprehensive analysis of the uses and limits of 'modularity' in law--specifically, the role legal boundaries (spatial or intangible) play in reducing information costs within legal systems. Moreover, we discuss how our model can improve theories of legal artificial intelligence. Finally, we explore the application of legal theory back to physics. If quantum physical entanglement operates analogously to legal entanglement, it requires discarding both locality and classical realism, though not in the manner commonly imagined.

Related papers

• LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning [54.57434222018289]
  We present LegalOne, a family of foundational models specifically tailored for the Chinese legal domain.<n>LegalOne is developed through a comprehensive three-phase pipeline designed to master legal reasoning.<n>We publicly release the LegalOne weights and the LegalKit evaluation framework to advance the field of Legal AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:18:32Z)
• The Order of Physical Law [0.0]
  Second-order legal relations generally concern the intentional, volitional acts of legal actors exercising legal powers.<n>This article adapts the notion of legal order to propose a theory of first- and higher-order physical laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T03:59:04Z)
• Automating Legal Interpretation with LLMs: Retrieval, Generation, and Evaluation [27.345475442620746]
  ATRIE consists of a legal concept interpreter and a legal concept interpretation evaluator.<n>The quality of our interpretations is comparable to those written by legal experts, with superior comprehensiveness and readability.<n>Although there remains a slight gap in accuracy, it can already assist legal practitioners in improving the efficiency of legal interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-03T10:11:38Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Compositional Law Parsing with Latent Random Functions [54.26307134687171]
  We propose a deep latent variable model for Compositional LAw Parsing (CLAP) CLAP achieves the human-like compositionality ability through an encoding-decoding architecture to represent concepts in the scene as latent variables. Our experimental results demonstrate that CLAP outperforms the compared baseline methods in multiple visual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T06:57:23Z)
• Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is(n't) Law [91.85674537754346]
  Both technical security mechanisms and legal processes serve as mechanisms to deal with misbehaviour according to a set of norms. While they share general similarities, there are also clear differences in how they are defined, act, and the effect they have on subjects. This paper considers the similarities and differences between both types of mechanisms as ways of dealing with misbehaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T18:03:07Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature [0.0]
  The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans and non-Humeans. We propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature according to which there is no such requirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-19T21:09:39Z)
• The Legislative Recipe: Syntax for Machine-Readable Legislation [0.0]
  This article attempts to unpack the notion of machine-readability. It will reflect on logic syntax and symbolic language to assess the capacity and limits of representing legal knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T13:40:35Z)
• Towards a General Many-Sorted Framework for Describing Certain Kinds of Legal Statutes with a Potential Computational Realization [0.0]
  We introduce the mathematical syntactic figure present in the logical empiricism' in a contemporary mathematical logic. We present a concrete formal syntactic translation of one of the central statutes of Swedish legislation for the purchase of immovable property.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T05:01:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.