Injecting Falsehoods: Adversarial Man-in-the-Middle Attacks Undermining Factual Recall in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05919v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:19 GMT
• Title: Injecting Falsehoods: Adversarial Man-in-the-Middle Attacks Undermining Factual Recall in LLMs
• Authors: Alina Fastowski, Bardh Prenkaj, Yuxiao Li, Gjergji Kasneci,
• Abstract summary: We propose the first principled attack evaluation on factual memory under prompt injection via Xmera.<n> trivial instruction-based attacks report the highest success rate (up to 85.3%) while simultaneously having a high uncertainty for incorrectly answered questions.<n>We train Random Forest classifiers on the response uncertainty levels to distinguish between attacked and unattacked queries.
• Score: 20.83956587986665
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs are now an integral part of information retrieval. As such, their role as question answering chatbots raises significant concerns due to their shown vulnerability to adversarial man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. Here, we propose the first principled attack evaluation on LLM factual memory under prompt injection via Xmera, our novel, theory-grounded MitM framework. By perturbing the input given to "victim" LLMs in three closed-book and fact-based QA settings, we undermine the correctness of the responses and assess the uncertainty of their generation process. Surprisingly, trivial instruction-based attacks report the highest success rate (up to ~85.3%) while simultaneously having a high uncertainty for incorrectly answered questions. To provide a simple defense mechanism against Xmera, we train Random Forest classifiers on the response uncertainty levels to distinguish between attacked and unattacked queries (average AUC of up to ~96%). We believe that signaling users to be cautious about the answers they receive from black-box and potentially corrupt LLMs is a first checkpoint toward user cyberspace safety.

Related papers

• Friend or Foe: How LLMs' Safety Mind Gets Fooled by Intent Shift Attack [53.34204977366491]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks despite their impressive capabilities.<n>In this paper, we introduce ISA (Intent Shift Attack), which obfuscates LLMs about the intent of the attacks.<n>Our approach only needs minimal edits to the original request, and yields natural, human-readable, and seemingly harmless prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T13:44:42Z)
• Revisiting Backdoor Attacks on LLMs: A Stealthy and Practical Poisoning Framework via Harmless Inputs [54.90315421117162]
  We propose a novel poisoning method via completely harmless data.<n>Inspired by the causal reasoning in auto-regressive LLMs, we aim to establish robust associations between triggers and an affirmative response prefix.<n>We observe an interesting resistance phenomenon where the LLM initially appears to agree but subsequently refuses to answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:13:59Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM [53.79753074854936]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks.<n>This vulnerability poses significant risks to real-world applications.<n>We propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T12:42:33Z)
• Uncertainty is Fragile: Manipulating Uncertainty in Large Language Models [79.76293901420146]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are employed across various high-stakes domains, where the reliability of their outputs is crucial. Our research investigates the fragility of uncertainty estimation and explores potential attacks. We demonstrate that an attacker can embed a backdoor in LLMs, which, when activated by a specific trigger in the input, manipulates the model's uncertainty without affecting the final output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T23:41:11Z)
• Leveraging the Context through Multi-Round Interactions for Jailbreaking Attacks [55.603893267803265]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to Jailbreaking attacks. Jailbreaking attacks aim to extract harmful information by subtly modifying the attack query. We focus on a new attack form, called Contextual Interaction Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T13:45:19Z)
• SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks [99.23352758320945]
  We propose SmoothLLM, the first algorithm designed to mitigate jailbreaking attacks on large language models (LLMs) Based on our finding that adversarially-generated prompts are brittle to character-level changes, our defense first randomly perturbs multiple copies of a given input prompt, and then aggregates the corresponding predictions to detect adversarial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T17:01:53Z)
• Jailbreaker in Jail: Moving Target Defense for Large Language Models [4.426665953648274]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. LLMs either fail to be "harmless" by presenting unethical answers, or fail to be "helpful" by refusing to offer meaningful answers. To strike a balance between being helpful and harmless, we design a moving target defense (MTD) enhanced LLM system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T20:32:04Z)
• Goal-Oriented Prompt Attack and Safety Evaluation for LLMs [43.93613764464993]
  We introduce a pipeline to construct high-quality prompt attack samples, along with a Chinese prompt attack dataset called CPAD. Our prompts aim to induce LLMs to generate unexpected outputs with several carefully designed prompt attack templates. The results show that our prompts are significantly harmful to LLMs, with around 70% attack success rate to GPT-3.5.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T07:07:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.