The Future of AI in the GCC Post-NPM Landscape: A Comparative Analysis of Kuwait and the UAE
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05932v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:54:27 GMT
- Title: The Future of AI in the GCC Post-NPM Landscape: A Comparative Analysis of Kuwait and the UAE
- Authors: Mohammad Rashed Albous, Bedour Alboloushi, Arnaud Lacheret,
- Abstract summary: We analyze constitutional, collective-choice, and operational rules shaping AI uptake in the UAE and Kuwait.<n>We find that vertical rule coherence, not wealth, determines AI's public-value yield.<n>The findings refine institutional theory by showing that vertical rule coherence, not wealth, determines AI's public-value yield.
- Score: 0.19116784879310025
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Comparative evidence on how Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states turn artificial intelligence (AI) ambitions into post--New Public Management (post-NPM) outcomes is scarce because most studies examine Western democracies. We analyze constitutional, collective-choice, and operational rules shaping AI uptake in two contrasting GCC members, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Kuwait, and whether they foster citizen centricity, collaborative governance, and public value creation. Anchored in Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development framework, the study combines a most similar/most different systems design with multiple sources: 62 public documents from 2018--2025, embedded UAE cases (Smart Dubai and MBZUAI), and 39 interviews with officials conducted Aug 2024--May 2025. Dual coding and process tracing connect rule configurations to AI performance. Cross-case analysis identifies four reinforcing mechanisms behind divergent trajectories. In the UAE, concentrated authority, credible sanctions, pro-innovation narratives, and flexible reinvestment rules scale pilots into hundreds of services and sizable recycled savings. In Kuwait, dispersed veto points, exhortative sanctions, cautious discourse, and lapsed AI budgets confine initiatives to pilot mode despite equivalent fiscal resources. The findings refine institutional theory by showing that vertical rule coherence, not wealth, determines AI's public-value yield, and temper post-NPM optimism by revealing that efficiency metrics serve societal goals only when backed by enforceable safeguards. To curb ethics washing and test transferability beyond the GCC, future work should track rule diffusion over time, develop blended legitimacy--efficiency scorecards, and examine how narrative framing shapes citizen consent for data sharing.
Related papers
- Pluralism in AI Governance: Toward Sociotechnical Alignment and Normative Coherence [0.16921396880325779]
The study synthesises frameworks including Full-Stack Alignment, Thick Models of Value, Value Sensitive Design, and Public Constitutional AI.<n>It introduces a layered framework linking values, mechanisms, and strategies, and maps tensions such as fairness versus efficiency, transparency versus security, and privacy versus equity.<n>The study contributes a holistic, value-sensitive model of AI governance, reframing regulation as a proactive mechanism for embedding public values into sociotechnical systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T14:28:56Z) - Artificial intelligence and the Gulf Cooperation Council workforce adapting to the future of work [0.5735035463793009]
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) raises a central question: are investments in compute infrastructure matched by a robust build-out of skills, incentives, and governance?<n>This study audits workforce preparedness across Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman.<n>We identify an emerging two-track talent system, research elites versus rapidly trained practitioners, that risks labor-market bifurcation without bridging mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T08:42:14Z) - AI Governance in the GCC States: A Comparative Analysis of National AI Strategies [0.0]
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states increasingly adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) to drive economic diversification and enhance services.<n>This paper investigates the evolving AI governance landscape across the six GCC nations, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait.<n>Findings highlight a "soft regulation" approach that emphasizes national strategies and ethical principles rather than binding regulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-04T16:25:52Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z) - Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z) - The AI Pentad, the CHARME$^{2}$D Model, and an Assessment of Current-State AI Regulation [5.231576332164012]
This paper aims to establish a unifying model for AI regulation from the perspective of core AI components.<n>We first introduce the AI Pentad, which comprises the five essential components of AI.<n>We then review AI regulatory enablers, including AI registration and disclosure, AI monitoring, and AI enforcement mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T22:58:41Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI.
compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation.
naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z) - Advancing Legal Reasoning: The Integration of AI to Navigate
Complexities and Biases in Global Jurisprudence with Semi-Automated
Arbitration Processes (SAAPs) [0.0]
This study focuses on the analysis of court judgments spanning five countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Rwanda, Sweden and Hong Kong.
By incorporating Advanced Language Models (ALMs) and a newly introduced human-AI collaborative framework, this paper seeks to analyze Grounded Theory-based research design with AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T16:47:34Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax
Policies [119.07163415116686]
We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity.
We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics.
We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.