Evaluation of retrieval-based QA on QUEST-LOFT
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06125v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 20:30:45 GMT
- Title: Evaluation of retrieval-based QA on QUEST-LOFT
- Authors: Nathan Scales, Nathanael Schärli, Olivier Bousquet,
- Abstract summary: This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the factors contributing to the poor performance on QUEST-LOFT.<n>We show that RAG can be optimized to significantly outperform long-context approaches when combined with a structured output format containing reasoning and evidence.
- Score: 7.2375213888360586
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite the popularity of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as a solution for grounded QA in both academia and industry, current RAG methods struggle with questions where the necessary information is distributed across many documents or where retrieval needs to be combined with complex reasoning. Recently, the LOFT study has shown that this limitation also applies to approaches based on long-context language models, with the QUEST benchmark exhibiting particularly large headroom. In this paper, we provide an in-depth analysis of the factors contributing to the poor performance on QUEST-LOFT, publish updated numbers based on a thorough human evaluation, and demonstrate that RAG can be optimized to significantly outperform long-context approaches when combined with a structured output format containing reasoning and evidence, optionally followed by answer re-verification.
Related papers
- Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z) - Retro*: Optimizing LLMs for Reasoning-Intensive Document Retrieval [44.680580989270965]
Retro* is a novel approach for reasoning-intensive document retrieval.<n>We introduce a rubric-based relevance scoring mechanism, enabling the model to reason about the relationship between a task and a document.<n>Our experiments show that Retro* outperforms existing document retrieval methods with notable advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T14:53:05Z) - Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z) - From Ambiguity to Accuracy: The Transformative Effect of Coreference Resolution on Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems [6.762635083456022]
We investigate how entity coreference affects both document retrieval and generative performance in RAG-based systems.<n>We demonstrate that coreference resolution enhances retrieval effectiveness and improves question-answering (QA) performance.<n>This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the challenges posed by coreferential complexity in RAG, providing guidance for improving retrieval and generation in knowledge-intensive AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T15:26:59Z) - Controlled Retrieval-augmented Context Evaluation for Long-form RAG [58.14561461943611]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models by incorporating context retrieved from external knowledge sources.<n>We argue that providing a comprehensive retrieval-augmented context is important for long-form RAG tasks like report generation.<n>We introduce CRUX, a framework designed to directly assess retrieval-augmented contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T23:17:48Z) - Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Enhancements, and Robustness Frontiers [0.0]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm to enhance large language models.<n>RAG introduces new challenges in retrieval quality, grounding fidelity, pipeline efficiency, and robustness against noisy or adversarial inputs.<n>This survey aims to consolidate current knowledge in RAG research and serve as a foundation for the next generation of retrieval-augmented language modeling systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T22:57:04Z) - Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [91.02950964802454]
This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z) - A Survey of Query Optimization in Large Language Models [10.255235456427037]
RAG mitigates the limitations of Large Language Models by dynamically retrieving and leveraging up-to-date relevant information.<n>QO has emerged as a critical element, playing a pivotal role in determining the effectiveness of RAG's retrieval stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T13:26:04Z) - RAG-QA Arena: Evaluating Domain Robustness for Long-form Retrieval Augmented Question Answering [61.19126689470398]
Long-form RobustQA (LFRQA) is a new dataset covering 26K queries and large corpora across seven different domains.
We show via experiments that RAG-QA Arena and human judgments on answer quality are highly correlated.
Only 41.3% of the most competitive LLM's answers are preferred to LFRQA's answers, demonstrating RAG-QA Arena as a challenging evaluation platform for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T03:02:51Z) - QontSum: On Contrasting Salient Content for Query-focused Summarization [22.738731393540633]
Query-focused summarization (QFS) is a challenging task in natural language processing that generates summaries to address specific queries.
This paper highlights the role of QFS in Grounded Answer Generation (GAR)
We propose QontSum, a novel approach for QFS that leverages contrastive learning to help the model attend to the most relevant regions of the input document.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T19:25:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.