Controlled Retrieval-augmented Context Evaluation for Long-form RAG

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20051v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 23:17:48 GMT
• Title: Controlled Retrieval-augmented Context Evaluation for Long-form RAG
• Authors: Jia-Huei Ju, Suzan Verberne, Maarten de Rijke, Andrew Yates,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models by incorporating context retrieved from external knowledge sources.<n>We argue that providing a comprehensive retrieval-augmented context is important for long-form RAG tasks like report generation.<n>We introduce CRUX, a framework designed to directly assess retrieval-augmented contexts.
• Score: 58.14561461943611
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models by incorporating context retrieved from external knowledge sources. While the effectiveness of the retrieval module is typically evaluated with relevance-based ranking metrics, such metrics may be insufficient to reflect the retrieval's impact on the final RAG result, especially in long-form generation scenarios. We argue that providing a comprehensive retrieval-augmented context is important for long-form RAG tasks like report generation and propose metrics for assessing the context independent of generation. We introduce CRUX, a \textbf{C}ontrolled \textbf{R}etrieval-a\textbf{U}gmented conte\textbf{X}t evaluation framework designed to directly assess retrieval-augmented contexts. This framework uses human-written summaries to control the information scope of knowledge, enabling us to measure how well the context covers information essential for long-form generation. CRUX uses question-based evaluation to assess RAG's retrieval in a fine-grained manner. Empirical results show that CRUX offers more reflective and diagnostic evaluation. Our findings also reveal substantial room for improvement in current retrieval methods, pointing to promising directions for advancing RAG's retrieval. Our data and code are publicly available to support and advance future research on retrieval.

Related papers

• mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs [11.861763118322136]
  We introduce mmRAG, a modular benchmark for evaluating multi-modal RAG systems.<n>Our benchmark integrates queries from six diverse question-answering datasets spanning text, tables, and knowledge graphs.<n>We follow standard information retrieval procedures to annotate document relevance and derive dataset relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T12:31:29Z)
• MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation [8.950307082012763]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained prominence as an effective method for enhancing the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present MIRAGE, a Question Answering dataset specifically designed for RAG evaluation.<n>MIRAGE consists of 7,560 curated instances mapped to a retrieval pool of 37,800 entries, enabling an efficient and precise evaluation of both retrieval and generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T23:05:46Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [29.186229489968564]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has revolutionized natural language processing by integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with external information retrieval.<n> evaluating RAG systems presents unique challenges due to their hybrid architecture that combines retrieval and generation components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T06:39:47Z)
• SePer: Measure Retrieval Utility Through The Lens Of Semantic Perplexity Reduction [20.6787276745193]
  We introduce an automatic evaluation method that measures retrieval quality through the lens of information gain within the RAG framework.<n>We quantify the utility of retrieval by the extent to which it reduces semantic perplexity post-retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T12:37:34Z)
• Is Relevance Propagated from Retriever to Generator in RAG? [21.82171240511567]
  RAG is a framework for incorporating external knowledge, usually in the form of a set of documents retrieved from a collection.<n>We empirically investigate whether a RAG context comprised of topically relevant documents leads to improved downstream performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T20:21:46Z)
• Controlling Risk of Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Counterfactual Prompting Framework [77.45983464131977]
  We focus on how likely it is that a RAG model's prediction is incorrect, resulting in uncontrollable risks in real-world applications.<n>Our research identifies two critical latent factors affecting RAG's confidence in its predictions.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting framework that induces the models to alter these factors and analyzes the effect on their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:52:14Z)
• RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation [61.14660526363607]
  We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T10:20:54Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey [13.633909177683462]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T02:33:25Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval [58.800799175084286]
  generative retrieval systems often directly return a grounded generated text as a response to a query. Quantifying the utility of the textual responses is essential for appropriately evaluating such generative ad hoc retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T14:05:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.