On the Interplay between Positional Encodings, Morphological Complexity, and Word Order Flexibility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08139v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:42:22 GMT
• Title: On the Interplay between Positional Encodings, Morphological Complexity, and Word Order Flexibility
• Authors: Kushal Tatariya, Wessel Poelman, Miryam de Lhoneux,
• Abstract summary: Positional encodings are a direct target to investigate the implications of the trade-off hypothesis.<n>Contrary to previous findings, we do not observe a clear interaction between position encodings and morphological complexity or word order flexibility.<n>Our results show that the choice of tasks, languages, and metrics are essential for drawing stable conclusions.
• Score: 5.521655731616328
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language model architectures are predominantly first created for English and subsequently applied to other languages. It is an open question whether this architectural bias leads to degraded performance for languages that are structurally different from English. We examine one specific architectural choice: positional encodings, through the lens of the trade-off hypothesis: the supposed interplay between morphological complexity and word order flexibility. This hypothesis posits a trade-off between the two: a more morphologically complex language can have a more flexible word order, and vice-versa. Positional encodings are a direct target to investigate the implications of this hypothesis in relation to language modelling. We pretrain monolingual model variants with absolute, relative, and no positional encodings for seven typologically diverse languages and evaluate them on four downstream tasks. Contrary to previous findings, we do not observe a clear interaction between position encodings and morphological complexity or word order flexibility, as measured by various proxies. Our results show that the choice of tasks, languages, and metrics are essential for drawing stable conclusions

Related papers

• The Roots of Performance Disparity in Multilingual Language Models: Intrinsic Modeling Difficulty or Design Choices? [42.515122675241486]
  Current systems deliver uneven performance across the world's languages.<n>This survey examines why these gaps persist and whether they reflect intrinsic linguistic difficulty or modeling artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:25:39Z)
• Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages? [0.913127392774573]
  We find new evidence for a performance gap between agglutinative and fusional languages. We propose three possible causes for this performance gap: morphological alignment of tokenizers, tokenization quality, and disparities in dataset sizes and measurement. Results suggest that no language is harder or easier for a language model to learn on the basis of its morphological typology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T15:06:51Z)
• A Morphology-Based Investigation of Positional Encodings [46.667985003225496]
  Morphology and word order are closely linked, with the latter incorporated into transformer-based models through positional encodings. This prompts a fundamental inquiry: Is there a correlation between the morphological complexity of a language and the utilization of positional encoding in pre-trained language models? In pursuit of an answer, we present the first study addressing this question, encompassing 22 languages and 5 downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T07:10:47Z)
• Cross-Lingual Transfer of Cognitive Processing Complexity [11.939409227407769]
  We use sentence-level eye-tracking patterns as a cognitive indicator for structural complexity. We show that the multilingual model XLM-RoBERTa can successfully predict varied patterns for 13 typologically diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T15:48:23Z)
• Modeling Target-Side Morphology in Neural Machine Translation: A Comparison of Strategies [72.56158036639707]
  Morphologically rich languages pose difficulties to machine translation. A large amount of differently inflected word surface forms entails a larger vocabulary. Some inflected forms of infrequent terms typically do not appear in the training corpus. Linguistic agreement requires the system to correctly match the grammatical categories between inflected word forms in the output sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T10:13:20Z)
• Morphology Without Borders: Clause-Level Morphological Annotation [8.559428282730021]
  We propose to view morphology as a clause-level phenomenon, rather than word-level. We deliver a novel dataset for clause-level morphology covering 4 typologically-different languages: English, German, Turkish and Hebrew. Our experiments show that the clause-level tasks are substantially harder than the respective word-level tasks, while having comparable complexity across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T17:20:28Z)
• A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared Embedding Space [61.18554842370824]
  In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space. We compute a task-based measure of cross-lingual alignment in the form of bitext retrieval performance. We examine a range of linguistic, quasi-linguistic, and training-related features as potential predictors of these alignment metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T21:05:37Z)
• VECO: Variable and Flexible Cross-lingual Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation [77.82373082024934]
  We plug a cross-attention module into the Transformer encoder to explicitly build the interdependence between languages. It can effectively avoid the degeneration of predicting masked words only conditioned on the context in its own language. The proposed cross-lingual model delivers new state-of-the-art results on various cross-lingual understanding tasks of the XTREME benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T03:41:38Z)
• Bridging Linguistic Typology and Multilingual Machine Translation with Multi-View Language Representations [83.27475281544868]
  We use singular vector canonical correlation analysis to study what kind of information is induced from each source. We observe that our representations embed typology and strengthen correlations with language relationships. We then take advantage of our multi-view language vector space for multilingual machine translation, where we achieve competitive overall translation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T16:25:39Z)
• On the Importance of Word Order Information in Cross-lingual Sequence Labeling [80.65425412067464]
  Cross-lingual models that fit into the word order of the source language might fail to handle target languages. We investigate whether making models insensitive to the word order of the source language can improve the adaptation performance in target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T03:35:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.