A Deep Learning-Based Method for Fully Coupled Non-Markovian FBSDEs with Applications
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08735v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:04:46 GMT
- Title: A Deep Learning-Based Method for Fully Coupled Non-Markovian FBSDEs with Applications
- Authors: Hasib Uddin Molla, Ankit Banarjee, Matthew Backhouse, Jinniao Qiu,
- Abstract summary: In this work, we extend deep learning-based numerical methods to fully coupled forward-backward differential equations.<n>In contrast to the existing literature, our approach not only analyzes the non-Markovian framework but also addresses fully coupled coefficients.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this work, we extend deep learning-based numerical methods to fully coupled forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) within a non-Markovian framework. Error estimates and convergence are provided. In contrast to the existing literature, our approach not only analyzes the non-Markovian framework but also addresses fully coupled settings, in which both the drift and diffusion coefficients of the forward process may be random and depend on the backward components $Y$ and $Z$. Furthermore, we illustrate the practical applicability of our framework by addressing utility maximization problems under rough volatility, which are solved numerically with the proposed deep learning-based methods.
Related papers
- Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget [55.938644481736446]
We introduce a novel algorithm for best feasible arm identification that guarantees an exponential decay in the error probability.<n>We validate our algorithm through comprehensive empirical evaluations across various problem instances with different levels of complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T02:56:26Z) - Decentralized Nonconvex Composite Federated Learning with Gradient Tracking and Momentum [78.27945336558987]
Decentralized server (DFL) eliminates reliance on client-client architecture.<n>Non-smooth regularization is often incorporated into machine learning tasks.<n>We propose a novel novel DNCFL algorithm to solve these problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T08:32:25Z) - Achieving $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret in Average-Reward POMDPs with Known Observation Models [69.1820058966619]
We tackle average-reward infinite-horizon POMDPs with an unknown transition model.<n>We present a novel and simple estimator that overcomes this barrier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T22:29:41Z) - Total Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse PDE Solutions Obtained with Reduced-Order Deep Learning Surrogate Models [50.90868087591973]
We propose an approximate Bayesian method for quantifying the total uncertainty in inverse PDE solutions obtained with machine learning surrogate models.
We test the proposed framework by comparing it with the iterative ensemble smoother and deep ensembling methods for a non-linear diffusion equation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T19:06:02Z) - Distributionally Robust Skeleton Learning of Discrete Bayesian Networks [9.46389554092506]
We consider the problem of learning the exact skeleton of general discrete Bayesian networks from potentially corrupted data.
We propose to optimize the most adverse risk over a family of distributions within bounded Wasserstein distance or KL divergence to the empirical distribution.
We present efficient algorithms and show the proposed methods are closely related to the standard regularized regression approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T15:33:19Z) - A Rigorous Link between Deep Ensembles and (Variational) Bayesian
Methods [14.845158804951552]
We establish the first mathematically rigorous link between Bayesian, variational Bayesian, and ensemble methods.
On a technical level, our contribution amounts to a generalised variational inference through the lense of Wasserstein flows.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T11:13:59Z) - The Stochastic Proximal Distance Algorithm [5.3315823983402755]
We propose and analyze a class of iterative optimization methods that recover a desired constrained estimation problem as a penalty parameter.
We extend recent theoretical devices to establish finite error bounds and a complete characterization of convergence rates.
We validate our analysis via a thorough empirical study, also showing that unsurprisingly, the proposed method outpaces batch versions on popular learning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-21T22:07:28Z) - Fast Kernel Methods for Generic Lipschitz Losses via $p$-Sparsified
Sketches [3.3379026542599934]
Kernel methods are learning algorithms that enjoy solid theoretical foundations while suffering from important computational limitations.
We show that sparsified Gaussian (and Rademacher) sketches still produce theoretically-valid approximations.
We derive excess risk bounds for both single and multiple output kernel problems, with generic Lipschitz losses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T11:50:23Z) - Distributionally Robust Federated Averaging [19.875176871167966]
We present communication efficient distributed algorithms for robust learning periodic averaging with adaptive sampling.
We give corroborating experimental evidence for our theoretical results in federated learning settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-25T03:32:09Z) - Scalable Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning [93.27920030279586]
We introduce Approximate Variational Reward Imitation Learning (AVRIL)
Our method addresses the ill-posed nature of the inverse reinforcement learning problem.
Applying our method to real medical data alongside classic control simulations, we demonstrate Bayesian reward inference in environments beyond the scope of current methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T12:32:02Z) - Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function.
It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.