One Signature, Multiple Payments: Demystifying and Detecting Signature Replay Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09134v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:34:42 GMT
• Title: One Signature, Multiple Payments: Demystifying and Detecting Signature Replay Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts
• Authors: Zexu Wang, Jiachi Chen, Zewei Lin, Wenqing Chen, Kaiwen Ning, Jianxing Yu, Yuming Feng, Yu Zhang, Weizhe Zhang, Zibin Zheng,
• Abstract summary: lacking checks on signature usage conditions can lead to repeated verifications, increasing the risk of permission abuse and threatening contract assets.<n>We define this issue as the Signature Replay Vulnerability (SRV)<n>From 1,419 audit reports across 37 blockchain security companies, we identified 108 with detailed SRV descriptions and classified five types of SRVs.
• Score: 56.94148977064169
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Smart contracts have significantly advanced blockchain technology, and digital signatures are crucial for reliable verification of contract authority. Through signature verification, smart contracts can ensure that signers possess the required permissions, thus enhancing security and scalability. However, lacking checks on signature usage conditions can lead to repeated verifications, increasing the risk of permission abuse and threatening contract assets. We define this issue as the Signature Replay Vulnerability (SRV). In this paper, we conducted the first empirical study to investigate the causes and characteristics of the SRVs. From 1,419 audit reports across 37 blockchain security companies, we identified 108 with detailed SRV descriptions and classified five types of SRVs. To detect these vulnerabilities automatically, we designed LASiR, which utilizes the general semantic understanding ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in the static taint analysis of the signature state and identify the signature reuse behavior. It also employs path reachability verification via symbolic execution to ensure effective and reliable detection. To evaluate the performance of LASiR, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15,383 contracts involving signature verification, selected from the initial dataset of 918,964 contracts across four blockchains: Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Polygon, and Arbitrum. The results indicate that SRVs are widespread, with affected contracts holding $4.76 million in active assets. Among these, 19.63% of contracts that use signatures on Ethereum contain SRVs. Furthermore, manual verification demonstrates that LASiR achieves an F1-score of 87.90% for detection. Ablation studies and comparative experiments reveal that the semantic information provided by LLMs aids static taint analysis, significantly enhancing LASiR's detection performance.

Related papers

• Where Do Smart Contract Security Analyzers Fall Short? [1.6058099298620423]
  We evaluate six widely used analyzers on 653 real-world smart contracts.<n>We then survey 150 professional developers and auditors to understand how they use and perceive these tools.<n>Our findings reveal that excessive false positives, vague explanations, and long analysis times are the main barriers to trust and adoption in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T03:27:05Z)
• Examining the Effectiveness of Transformer-Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Scan [0.0]
  We evaluate deep learning-based approaches for vulnerability scanning of smart contracts.<n>We propose VASCOT, a Vulnerability Analyzer for Smart COntracts using Transformers.<n>VASCOT's performance is compared against a state-of-the-art LSTM-based vulnerability detection model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T09:00:42Z)
• SSR: Safeguarding Staking Rewards by Defining and Detecting Logical Defects in DeFi Staking [55.62033436283969]
  Decentralized Finance (DeFi) staking is one of the most prominent applications within the DeFi ecosystem.<n> logical defects in DeFi staking could enable attackers to claim unwarranted rewards.<n>We developed SSR (Safeguarding Staking Reward), a static analysis tool designed to detect logical defects in DeFi staking contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T15:01:41Z)
• Trace: Securing Smart Contract Repository Against Access Control Vulnerability [58.02691083789239]
  GitHub hosts numerous smart contract repositories containing source code, documentation, and configuration files.<n>Third-party developers often reference, reuse, or fork code from these repositories during custom development.<n>Existing tools for detecting smart contract vulnerabilities are limited in their ability to handle complex repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T05:18:28Z)
• Decompiling Smart Contracts with a Large Language Model [51.49197239479266]
  Despite Etherscan's 78,047,845 smart contracts deployed on (as of May 26, 2025), a mere 767,520 ( 1%) are open source.<n>This opacity necessitates the automated semantic analysis of on-chain smart contract bytecode.<n>We introduce a pioneering decompilation pipeline that transforms bytecode into human-readable and semantically faithful Solidity code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T13:42:59Z)
• Demystifying and Detecting Cryptographic Defects in Ethereum Smart Contracts [14.203991954526789]
  We conducted the first study aimed at demystifying and detecting cryptographic defects in smart contracts. We proposed CrySol, a fuzzing-based tool to automate the detection of cryptographic defects in smart contracts. We collected a large-scale dataset containing 25,745 real-world crypto-related smart contracts and evaluated CrySol's effectiveness on it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T08:40:08Z)
• All Your Tokens are Belong to Us: Demystifying Address Verification Vulnerabilities in Solidity Smart Contracts [24.881450403784786]
  Vulnerabilities in the process of address verification can lead to great security issues. We design and implement AVVERIFIER, a lightweight taint analyzer based on static EVM opcode simulation. After a large-scale evaluation of over 5 million smart contracts, we have identified 812 vulnerable smart contracts that were undisclosed by our community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T01:02:07Z)
• Improving Smart Contract Security with Contrastive Learning-based Vulnerability Detection [8.121484960948303]
  We propose Contrastive Learning Enhanced Automated Recognition Approach for Smart Contract Vulnerabilities, named Clear. In particular, Clear employs a contrastive learning (CL) model to capture the fine-grained correlation information among contracts. We show that Clear achieves optimal performance over all baseline methods; (2) 9.73%-39.99% higher F1-score than existing deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T09:13:25Z)
• Efficiently Detecting Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Complex Smart Contracts [35.26195628798847]
  Existing vulnerability detection tools perform poorly in terms of efficiency and successful detection rates for vulnerabilities in complex contracts. SliSE provides a robust and efficient method for detection of Reentrancy vulnerabilities for complex contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T16:08:30Z)
• Vulnerability Scanners for Ethereum Smart Contracts: A Large-Scale Study [44.25093111430751]
  In 2023 alone, such vulnerabilities led to substantial financial losses exceeding a billion of US dollars. Various tools have been developed to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in smart contracts. This study investigates the gap between the effectiveness of existing security scanners and the vulnerabilities that still persist in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T11:26:26Z)
• FedSOV: Federated Model Secure Ownership Verification with Unforgeable Signature [60.99054146321459]
  Federated learning allows multiple parties to collaborate in learning a global model without revealing private data. We propose a cryptographic signature-based federated learning model ownership verification scheme named FedSOV.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T12:10:02Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.