Navigating the Ethics of Internet Measurement: Researchers' Perspectives from a Case Study in the EU

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10408v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:49:35 GMT
• Title: Navigating the Ethics of Internet Measurement: Researchers' Perspectives from a Case Study in the EU
• Authors: Sahibzada Farhan Amin, Sana Athar, Anja Feldmann, Ha Dao, Mannat Kaur,
• Abstract summary: We find that researchers deal with five main ethical challenges: privacy and consent issues, the possibility of unintended harm, balancing transparency with security and accountability, uncertain ethical boundaries, and hurdles in the ethics review process.<n>Researchers express that ethical requirements vary across institutions, jurisdictions and conferences, and ethics review boards often lack the technical knowledge to evaluate Internet measurement research.
• Score: 0.7964501839324883
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Internet measurement research is essential for understanding, improving, and securing Internet infrastructure. However, its methods often involve large-scale data collection and user observation, raising complex ethical questions. While recent research has identified ethical challenges in Internet measurement research and laid out best practices, little is known about how researchers actually make ethical decisions in their research practice. To understand how these practices take shape day-to-day from the perspective of Internet measurement researchers, we interviewed 16 researchers from an Internet measurement research group in the EU. Through thematic analysis, we find that researchers deal with five main ethical challenges: privacy and consent issues, the possibility of unintended harm, balancing transparency with security and accountability, uncertain ethical boundaries, and hurdles in the ethics review process. Researchers address these by lab testing, rate limiting, setting up clear communication channels, and relying heavily on mentors and colleagues for guidance. Researchers express that ethical requirements vary across institutions, jurisdictions and conferences, and ethics review boards often lack the technical knowledge to evaluate Internet measurement research. We also highlight the invisible labor of Internet measurement researchers and describe their ethics practices as craft knowledge, both of which are crucial in upholding responsible research practices in the Internet measurement community.

Related papers

• The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research [56.80927148740585]
  We address the challenges of scalability and rigor by flipping the dynamic and developing AI agents as research evaluators.<n>We use mechanistic interpretability research as a testbed, build standardized research output, and develop MechEvalAgent.<n>Our work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to transform research evaluation and pave the way for rigorous scientific practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:00:02Z)
• [Extended] Ethics in Computer Security Research: A Data-Driven Assessment of the Past, the Present, and the Possible Future [21.60516344845455]
  Researchers in computer security lack clear guidance on how to make, document, and assess ethical decisions.<n>We review all 1154 top-tier security papers published in 2024, finding inconsistent levels of ethics reporting.<n>We report on the results of a semi-structured interview study with 24 computer security and privacy researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T11:06:56Z)
• SoK: Advances and Open Problems in Web Tracking [71.54586748169943]
  Web tracking is a pervasive and opaque practice that enables personalized advertising, and conversion tracking.<n>Web tracking is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation driven by shifts in the advertising industry, the adoption of anti-tracking countermeasures by browsers, and the growing enforcement of emerging privacy regulations.<n>This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) aims to consolidate and synthesize this wide-ranging research, offering a comprehensive overview of the technical mechanisms, countermeasures, and regulations that shape the modern and rapidly evolving web tracking landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T23:30:54Z)
• AI Ethics and Social Norms: Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities From What to How [0.2999888908665658]
  This study aims to evaluate whether ChatGPT in an empirical context operates following ethics and social norms.<n>The findings of this study provide initial insights into six important aspects of AI ethics, including bias, trustworthiness, security, toxicology, social norms, and ethical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T03:26:30Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Measuring the Mental Health of Content Reviewers, a Systematic Review [50.06646946044604]
  Many workers report long-term, potentially irreversible psychological harm.<n>This work is similar to activities that cause psychological harm to other kinds of helping professionals even after small doses of exposure.<n>This systematic review summarizes psychological measures from other professions and relates them to the experiences of content reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T00:50:15Z)
• Web Scraping for Research: Legal, Ethical, Institutional, and Scientific Considerations [11.851771490297693]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for web scraping in social science research for U.S.-based researchers.<n>We present an overview of the current regulatory environment impacting when and how researchers can access, collect, store, and share data via scraping.<n>We then provide researchers with recommendations to conduct scraping in a scientifically legitimate and ethical manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T20:20:44Z)
• A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
  stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z)
• The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
  This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Ethical issues with using Internet of Things devices in citizen science research: A scoping review [1.933681537640272]
  This chapter presents a scoping review of published scientific studies that utilise both citizen scientists and Internet of Things devices. We selected studies where the authors had included at least a short discussion of the ethical issues encountered during the research process. Following this analysis, our discussion provides recommendations for researchers who wish to integrate citizen scientists and Internet of Things devices into their research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T12:22:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.