Towards Emotionally Intelligent and Responsible Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10573v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:58:19 GMT
• Title: Towards Emotionally Intelligent and Responsible Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Garapati Keerthana, Manik Gupta,
• Abstract summary: We propose a Responsible Reinforcement Learning framework that integrates emotional and contextual understanding with ethical considerations.<n>We introduce a multi-objective reward function that balances short-term behavioral engagement with long-term user well-being.<n>We discuss the implications of this approach for human-centric domains such as behavioral health, education, and digital therapeutics.
• Score: 0.40719854602160227
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Personalized decision systems in healthcare and behavioral support often rely on static rule-based or engagement-maximizing heuristics that overlook users' emotional context and ethical constraints. Such approaches risk recommending insensitive or unsafe interventions, especially in domains involving serious mental illness, substance use disorders, or depression. To address this limitation, we propose a Responsible Reinforcement Learning (RRL) framework that integrates emotional and contextual understanding with ethical considerations into the sequential decision-making process. RRL formulates personalization as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP), where the agent optimizes engagement and adherence while ensuring emotional alignment and ethical safety. We introduce a multi-objective reward function that explicitly balances short-term behavioral engagement with long-term user well-being, and define an emotion-informed state representation that captures fluctuations in emotional readiness, affect, and risk. The proposed architecture can be instantiated with any RL algorithm (e.g., DQN, PPO) augmented with safety constraints or Lagrangian regularization. Conceptually, this framework operationalizes empathy and responsibility within machine learning policy optimization, bridging safe RL, affective computing and responsible AI. We discuss the implications of this approach for human-centric domains such as behavioral health, education, and digital therapeutics, and outline simulation-based validation paths for future empirical work. This paper aims to initiate a methodological conversation about ethically aligned reinforcement learning for emotionally aware and trustworthy personalization systems.

Related papers

• Technosocial risks of ideal emotion recognition technologies: A defense of the (social) value of emotional expressions [51.56484100374058]
  I argue that the appeal of such systems rests on a misunderstanding of the social functions emotional expression.<n>ERTs threaten this expressive space by collapsing epistemic friction, displacing meaning with technology-mediated affective profiles, and narrowing the space for aspirational and role-sensitive expressions.<n>I argue that, although it is intuitive to think that increasing accuracy would legitimise such systems, in the case of ERTs accuracy does not straightforwardly justify their deployment, and may, in some contexts, provide a reason for regulatory restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:20:42Z)
• Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health [72.85175110624736]
  Current approaches to evaluating AI tools in mental health care are fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience.<n>This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T12:55:10Z)
• Causal Reinforcement Learning based Agent-Patient Interaction with Clinical Domain Knowledge [3.2434118923825483]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces significant challenges in adaptive healthcare interventions, such as dementia care, where data is scarce.<n>We present a novel framework called Causal structure-aware Reinforcement Learning (CRL) that explicitly integrates causal discovery and reasoning into policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T22:38:03Z)
• Domain-Specific Constitutional AI: Enhancing Safety in LLM-Powered Mental Health Chatbots [8.262471803441542]
  Mental health applications have emerged as a critical area in computational health.<n>General safeguards inadequately address mental health-specific challenges.<n>We introduce an approach to apply Constitutional AI training with domain-specific mental health principles for safe, domain-adapted CAI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T21:46:47Z)
• Mitigating Harmful Erraticism in LLMs Through Dialectical Behavior Therapy Based De-Escalation Strategies [0.0]
  This paper hypothesizes that a framework rooted in human psychological principles, specifically therapeutic modalities, can provide a more robust and sustainable solution.<n> Drawing an analogy to the simulated neural networks of AI mirroring the human brain, we propose the application of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-06T11:20:15Z)
• A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents [45.53643260046778]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of autonomous AI agents.<n>These large-model agents mark a paradigm shift from static inference systems to interactive, memory-augmented entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T13:34:34Z)
• Position Paper: Rethinking Privacy in RL for Sequential Decision-making in the Age of LLMs [46.828146821060265]
  We argue for a new privacy paradigm built on four core principles: multi-scale protection, behavioral pattern protection, collaborative privacy preservation, and context-aware adaptation.<n>These principles expose inherent tensions between privacy, utility, and interpretability that must be navigated as RL systems become more pervasive in high-stakes domains like healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and decision support systems powered by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T10:45:55Z)
• The challenge of uncertainty quantification of large language models in medicine [0.0]
  This study investigates uncertainty quantification in large language models (LLMs) for medical applications.<n>Our research frames uncertainty not as a barrier but as an essential part of knowledge that invites a dynamic and reflective approach to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T17:24:11Z)
• Teleology-Driven Affective Computing: A Causal Framework for Sustained Well-Being [0.1636303041090359]
  We propose a teleology-driven affective computing framework that unifies major emotion theories.<n>We advocate for creating a "dataverse" of personal affective events.<n>We introduce a meta-reinforcement learning paradigm to train agents in simulated environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T14:07:53Z)
• Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [58.61680631581921]
  Mental health disorders create profound personal and societal burdens, yet conventional diagnostics are resource-intensive and limit accessibility.<n>This paper examines these challenges and proposes solutions, including anonymization, synthetic data, and privacy-preserving training.<n>It aims to advance reliable, privacy-aware AI tools that support clinical decision-making and improve mental health outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z)
• Human services organizations and the responsible integration of AI: Considering ethics and contextualizing risk(s) [0.0]
  Authors argue that ethical concerns about AI deployment vary significantly based on implementation context and specific use cases.<n>They propose a dimensional risk assessment approach that considers factors like data sensitivity, professional oversight requirements, and potential impact on client wellbeing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T19:38:21Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
  The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape. This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z)
• Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functions [43.649330976089004]
  We model the problem of learning with constraints as a Constrained Markov Decision Process. A key contribution of our approach is to translate cumulative cost constraints into state-based constraints. We provide theoretical guarantees under which the agent converges while ensuring safety over the course of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T20:56:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.