Domain-Specific Constitutional AI: Enhancing Safety in LLM-Powered Mental Health Chatbots
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16444v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:46:47 GMT
- Title: Domain-Specific Constitutional AI: Enhancing Safety in LLM-Powered Mental Health Chatbots
- Authors: Chenhan Lyu, Yutong Song, Pengfei Zhang, Amir M. Rahmani,
- Abstract summary: Mental health applications have emerged as a critical area in computational health.<n>General safeguards inadequately address mental health-specific challenges.<n>We introduce an approach to apply Constitutional AI training with domain-specific mental health principles for safe, domain-adapted CAI systems.
- Score: 8.262471803441542
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Mental health applications have emerged as a critical area in computational health, driven by rising global rates of mental illness, the integration of AI in psychological care, and the need for scalable solutions in underserved communities. These include therapy chatbots, crisis detection, and wellness platforms handling sensitive data, requiring specialized AI safety beyond general safeguards due to emotional vulnerability, risks like misdiagnosis or symptom exacerbation, and precise management of vulnerable states to avoid severe outcomes such as self-harm or loss of trust. Despite AI safety advances, general safeguards inadequately address mental health-specific challenges, including crisis intervention accuracy to avert escalations, therapeutic guideline adherence to prevent misinformation, scale limitations in resource-constrained settings, and adaptation to nuanced dialogues where generics may introduce biases or miss distress signals. We introduce an approach to apply Constitutional AI training with domain-specific mental health principles for safe, domain-adapted CAI systems in computational mental health applications.
Related papers
- Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health [72.85175110624736]
Current approaches to evaluating AI tools in mental health care are fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience.<n>This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T12:55:10Z) - Towards Emotionally Intelligent and Responsible Reinforcement Learning [0.40719854602160227]
We propose a Responsible Reinforcement Learning framework that integrates emotional and contextual understanding with ethical considerations.<n>We introduce a multi-objective reward function that balances short-term behavioral engagement with long-term user well-being.<n>We discuss the implications of this approach for human-centric domains such as behavioral health, education, and digital therapeutics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T18:09:37Z) - A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems [55.67299586253951]
We present the first comprehensive survey of clinical mental health datasets relevant to the training and development of AI-powered clinical assistants.<n>Our survey identifies critical gaps such as a lack of longitudinal data, limited cultural and linguistic representation, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and a lack of modalities in synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T13:42:35Z) - Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z) - Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [58.61680631581921]
Mental health disorders create profound personal and societal burdens, yet conventional diagnostics are resource-intensive and limit accessibility.<n>This paper examines these challenges and proposes solutions, including anonymization, synthetic data, and privacy-preserving training.<n>It aims to advance reliable, privacy-aware AI tools that support clinical decision-making and improve mental health outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z) - Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z) - Harnessing Large Language Models for Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations [3.0655356440262334]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are AI-driven tools that empower mental health professionals with real-time support, improved data integration, and the ability to encourage care-seeking behaviors.<n>However, their implementation comes with significant challenges and ethical concerns.<n>This paper examines the transformative potential of LLMs in mental health care, highlights the associated technical and ethical complexities, and advocates for a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-13T13:18:51Z) - Enhancing Guardrails for Safe and Secure Healthcare AI [0.0]
I propose enhancements to existing guardrails frameworks, such as Nvidia NeMo Guardrails, to better suit healthcare-specific needs.
I aim to ensure the secure, reliable, and accurate use of AI in healthcare, mitigating misinformation risks and improving patient safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T06:30:06Z) - Risks from Language Models for Automated Mental Healthcare: Ethics and Structure for Implementation [0.0]
This paper proposes a structured framework that delineates levels of autonomy, outlines ethical requirements, and defines beneficial default behaviors for AI agents.
We also evaluate 14 state-of-the-art language models (ten off-the-shelf, four fine-tuned) using 16 mental health-related questionnaires.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T15:05:06Z) - COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.