PATCHEVAL: A New Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Patching Real-World Vulnerabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11019v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 07:14:32 GMT
• Title: PATCHEVAL: A New Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Patching Real-World Vulnerabilities
• Abstract summary: Vulnerabilities in software are increasing at an alarming rate.<n>Manual patching is time-consuming and resource-intensive.<n> automated vulnerability repair techniques remain limited in effectiveness.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened a new paradigm for vulnerability benchmarks.
• Score: 10.936360792186148
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Software vulnerabilities are increasing at an alarming rate. However, manual patching is both time-consuming and resource-intensive, while existing automated vulnerability repair (AVR) techniques remain limited in effectiveness. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened a new paradigm for AVR, demonstrating remarkable progress. To examine the capability of LLMs in AVR, several vulnerability benchmarks have been proposed recently. However, they still suffer from key limitations of outdated vulnerabilities, limited language coverage, unreliable patch validation, and insufficient reproducibility. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PATCHEVAL, a multilingual benchmark for Go, JavaScript, and Python, languages for which existing benchmarks remain unexplored. PATCHEVAL curates a dataset of 1,000 vulnerabilities drawn from CVEs reported between 2015 and 2025, covering 65 distinct CWEs. A subset of 230 CVEs is further equipped with runtime sandbox environments, enabling patch verification through both security tests and functionality tests. To provide a systematic comparison of LLM-based vulnerability repair, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art LLMs and agents, presenting an in-depth analysis that empirically yields key insights to guide future research in AVR.

Related papers

• RAVEN: Agentic RAG for Automated Vulnerability Repair [48.8954115363348]
  We propose RAVEN, a scalable, efficient and autonomous framework for automated vulnerability repair.<n>RAVEN integrates an agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline with controlled iterative repair in a unified framework.<n>RAVEN achieves an overall repair success rate of 83.13%, outperforming all existing state-of-the-art repair frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T19:18:06Z)
• SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization [61.91729298584227]
  We introduce SecureForge, an automated pipeline that audits security risks of frontier models and produces auditing-informed secure system prompts.<n>SecureForge first identifies benign prompts that produce statically detectable vulnerabilities, and then amplifies them into a large synthetic prompt corpus of diverse scenarios.<n>On frontier models, SecureForge yields a statistically significant improvement in both unit test success and output security, with output vulnerabilities reduced by up to 48%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T18:40:47Z)
• RealSec-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Secure Code Generation in Real-World Repositories [58.32028251925354]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, but their proficiency in producing secure code remains a critical, under-explored area.<n>We introduce RealSec-bench, a new benchmark for secure code generation meticulously constructed from real-world, high-risk Java repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T08:29:01Z)
• Contamination Detection for VLMs using Multi-Modal Semantic Perturbation [73.76465227729818]
  Open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on benchmark tasks.<n>Pretraining corpora raise a critical concern for both practitioners and users: inflated performance due to test-set leakage.<n>We show that existing detection approaches either fail outright or exhibit inconsistent behavior.<n>We propose a novel simple yet effective detection method based on multi-modal semantic perturbation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T18:59:52Z)
• What Do They Fix? LLM-Aided Categorization of Security Patches for Critical Memory Bugs [46.325755802511026]
  We developLM, a dual-method pipeline that integrates two approaches based on a Large Language Model (LLM) and a fine-tuned small language model.<n>LM successfully identified 111 of 5,140 recent Linux kernel patches addressing OOB or UAF vulnerabilities, with 90 true positives confirmed by manual verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T18:06:36Z)
• VulnRepairEval: An Exploit-Based Evaluation Framework for Assessing Large Language Model Vulnerability Repair Capabilities [41.85494398578654]
  VulnRepairEval is an evaluation framework anchored in functional Proof-of-Concept exploits.<n>Our framework delivers a comprehensive, containerized evaluation pipeline that enables reproducible differential assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:06:10Z)
• LLMxCPG: Context-Aware Vulnerability Detection Through Code Property Graph-Guided Large Language Models [2.891351178680099]
  This paper presents a novel framework integrating Code Property Graphs (CPG) with Large Language Models (LLM) for robust vulnerability detection.<n>Our approach's ability to provide a more concise and accurate representation of code snippets enables the analysis of larger code segments.<n> Empirical evaluation demonstrates LLMxCPG's effectiveness across verified datasets, achieving 15-40% improvements in F1-score over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T13:36:33Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning for Vulnerability Detection via Group Relative Policy Optimization [45.799380822683034]
  We present an extensive study aimed at advancing RL-based finetuning techniques for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We highlight key limitations of commonly adopted LLMs, such as their tendency to over-predict certain types of vulnerabilities while failing to detect others.<n>To address this challenge, we explore the use of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a recent policy-gradient method, for guiding LLM behavior through structured, rule-based rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T11:52:45Z)
• Pushing the Limits of Safety: A Technical Report on the ATLAS Challenge 2025 [167.94680155673046]
  This report presents findings from the Adversarial Testing & Large-model Alignment Safety Grand Challenge (ATLAS) 2025.<n>The competition involved 86 teams testing MLLM vulnerabilities via adversarial image-text attacks in two phases: white-box and black-box evaluations.<n>The challenge establishes new benchmarks for MLLM safety evaluation and lays groundwork for advancing safer AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T10:03:17Z)
• SecVulEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Real-World C/C++ Vulnerability Detection [8.440793630384546]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in software engineering tasks.<n> evaluating their effectiveness in vulnerability detection is challenging due to the lack of high-quality datasets.<n>This benchmark includes 25,440 function samples covering 5,867 unique CVEs in C/C++ projects from 1999 to 2024.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T11:06:03Z)
• LLM-Safety Evaluations Lack Robustness [58.334290876531036]
  We argue that current safety alignment research efforts for large language models are hindered by many intertwined sources of noise.<n>We propose a set of guidelines for reducing noise and bias in evaluations of future attack and defense papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T12:55:07Z)
• VulnLLMEval: A Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Software Vulnerability Detection and Patching [0.9208007322096533]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in tasks like code translation. This paper introduces VulnLLMEval, a framework designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and patching vulnerabilities in C code. Our study includes 307 real-world vulnerabilities extracted from the Linux kernel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T22:00:20Z)
• APPATCH: Automated Adaptive Prompting Large Language Models for Real-World Software Vulnerability Patching [24.958856670970366]
  In this paper, we leverage the power and merits of pre-trained language language models (LLMs) to enable automated vulnerability patching.<n>To elicit LLMs to effectively reason about vulnerable code behaviors, we introduce vulnerability semantics reasoning and adaptive prompting.<n>Our evaluation of AP on 97 zero-day vulnerabilities and 20 existing vulnerabilities demonstrates its superior performance to both existing methods and state-of-theart non-LLM-based techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T14:51:50Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.