From Single to Societal: Analyzing Persona-Induced Bias in Multi-Agent Interactions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11789v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:19:28 GMT
• Title: From Single to Societal: Analyzing Persona-Induced Bias in Multi-Agent Interactions
• Authors: Jiayi Li, Xiao Liu, Yansong Feng,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly used to simulate human interactions and solve collaborative tasks.<n>Do personas introduce biases into multi-agent interactions?<n>This paper presents a systematic investigation into persona-induced biases in multi-agent interactions.
• Score: 19.313710831511067
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are increasingly used to simulate human interactions and solve collaborative tasks. A common practice is to assign agents with personas to encourage behavioral diversity. However, this raises a critical yet underexplored question: do personas introduce biases into multi-agent interactions? This paper presents a systematic investigation into persona-induced biases in multi-agent interactions, with a focus on social traits like trustworthiness (how an agent's opinion is received by others) and insistence (how strongly an agent advocates for its opinion). Through a series of controlled experiments in collaborative problem-solving and persuasion tasks, we reveal that (1) LLM-based agents exhibit biases in both trustworthiness and insistence, with personas from historically advantaged groups (e.g., men and White individuals) perceived as less trustworthy and demonstrating less insistence; and (2) agents exhibit significant in-group favoritism, showing a higher tendency to conform to others who share the same persona. These biases persist across various LLMs, group sizes, and numbers of interaction rounds, highlighting an urgent need for awareness and mitigation to ensure the fairness and reliability of multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• The Social Cost of Intelligence: Emergence, Propagation, and Amplification of Stereotypical Bias in Multi-Agent Systems [20.359327253718718]
  Bias in large language models (LLMs) remains a persistent challenge, manifesting in stereotyping and unfair treatment across social groups.<n>We study how internal specialization, underlying LLMs and inter-agent communication protocols influence bias robustness, propagation, and amplification.<n>Our findings highlight critical factors shaping fairness and resilience in multi-agent LLM systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T02:56:42Z)
• Can an Individual Manipulate the Collective Decisions of Multi-Agents? [53.01767232004823]
  M-Spoiler is a framework that simulates agent interactions within a multi-agent system to generate adversarial samples.<n>M-Spoiler introduces a stubborn agent that actively aids in optimizing adversarial samples.<n>Our findings confirm the risks posed by the knowledge of an individual agent in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T01:54:20Z)
• An Empirical Study of Group Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems [0.26999000177990923]
  This study explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) agents shape public opinion through debates on five contentious topics.<n>By simulating over 2,500 debates, we analyze how initially neutral agents, assigned a centrist disposition, adopt specific stances over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T05:22:29Z)
• Judging with Many Minds: Do More Perspectives Mean Less Prejudice? On Bias Amplifications and Resistance in Multi-Agent Based LLM-as-Judge [70.89799989428367]
  We conduct a systematic analysis of four diverse bias types: position bias, verbosity bias, chain-of-thought bias, and bandwagon bias.<n>We evaluate these biases across two widely adopted multi-agent LLM-as-Judge frameworks: Multi-Agent-Debate and LLM-as-Meta-Judge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:56:41Z)
• HiddenBench: Assessing Collective Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs via Hidden Profile Tasks [12.203366267017737]
  We introduce HiddenBench, the first benchmark for evaluating collective reasoning in multi-agent LLMs.<n>To ground the benchmark, we formalize the paradigm with custom tasks and show that GPT-4.1 groups fail to integrate distributed knowledge.<n>We then construct the full benchmark, spanning 65 tasks drawn from custom designs, prior human studies, and automatic generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T19:22:54Z)
• LMAgent: A Large-scale Multimodal Agents Society for Multi-user Simulation [66.52371505566815]
  Large language models (LLMs)-based AI agents have made significant progress, enabling them to achieve human-like intelligence.<n>We present LMAgent, a very large-scale and multimodal agents society based on multimodal LLMs.<n>In LMAgent, besides chatting with friends, the agents can autonomously browse, purchase, and review products, even perform live streaming e-commerce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T12:47:09Z)
• Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactions [22.997945675889465]
  We investigate whether a group of AI agents can create social pressure on users to agree with them.<n>We found that conversing with multiple agents increased the social pressure felt by participants.<n>Our study shows the potential advantages of multi-agent systems over single-agent platforms in causing opinion change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T10:00:46Z)
• AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
  We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system. Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent. In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z)
• Multi-Agent Imitation Learning with Copulas [102.27052968901894]
  Multi-agent imitation learning aims to train multiple agents to perform tasks from demonstrations by learning a mapping between observations and actions. In this paper, we propose to use copula, a powerful statistical tool for capturing dependence among random variables, to explicitly model the correlation and coordination in multi-agent systems. Our proposed model is able to separately learn marginals that capture the local behavioral patterns of each individual agent, as well as a copula function that solely and fully captures the dependence structure among agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T03:49:41Z)
• Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents [73.03133692589532]
  We show how to equip RL agents with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:12:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.