Bayesian--AI Fusion for Epidemiological Decision Making: Calibrated Risk, Honest Uncertainty, and Hyperparameter Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11983v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 01:42:49 GMT
• Title: Bayesian--AI Fusion for Epidemiological Decision Making: Calibrated Risk, Honest Uncertainty, and Hyperparameter Intelligence
• Authors: Debashis Chatterjee,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a unified Bayesian and AI framework that combines Bayesian prediction with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization.<n>We use Bayesian logistic regression to obtain calibrated individual-level disease risk and credible intervals on the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset.<n>This yields a two-layer system: a Bayesian predictive layer that represents risk as a posterior distribution, and a Bayesian optimization layer that treats model selection as inference over a black-box objective.
• Score: 1.2183405753834562
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern epidemiological analytics increasingly use machine learning models that offer strong prediction but often lack calibrated uncertainty. Bayesian methods provide principled uncertainty quantification, yet are viewed as difficult to integrate with contemporary AI workflows. This paper proposes a unified Bayesian and AI framework that combines Bayesian prediction with Bayesian hyperparameter optimization. We use Bayesian logistic regression to obtain calibrated individual-level disease risk and credible intervals on the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. In parallel, we use Gaussian-process Bayesian optimization to tune penalized Cox survival models on the GBSG2 breast cancer cohort. This yields a two-layer system: a Bayesian predictive layer that represents risk as a posterior distribution, and a Bayesian optimization layer that treats model selection as inference over a black-box objective. Simulation studies in low- and high-dimensional regimes show that the Bayesian layer provides reliable coverage and improved calibration, while Bayesian shrinkage improves AUC, Brier score, and log-loss. Bayesian optimization consistently pushes survival models toward near-oracle concordance. Overall, Bayesian reasoning enhances both what we infer and how we search, enabling calibrated risk and principled hyperparameter intelligence for epidemiological decision making.

Related papers

• Bridging the Gap Between Bayesian Deep Learning and Ensemble Weather Forecasts [100.26854618129039]
  Weather forecasting is fundamentally challenged by the chaotic nature of the atmosphere.<n>Recent advances in Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL) offer a promising but often disconnected alternative.<n>We bridge these paradigms through a unified hybrid BDL framework for ensemble weather forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T07:49:52Z)
• NeuralSurv: Deep Survival Analysis with Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification [42.418429168532406]
  We introduce NeuralSurv, the first deep survival model to incorporate Bayesian uncertainty quantification.<n>For efficient posterior inference, we introduce a mean-field variational algorithm with coordinate-ascent updates that scale linearly in model size.<n>In experiments, NeuralSurv delivers superior calibration compared to state-of-the-art deep survival models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T09:53:21Z)
• Adaptive Sampling to Reduce Epistemic Uncertainty Using Prediction Interval-Generation Neural Networks [0.0]
  This paper presents an adaptive sampling approach designed to reduce epistemic uncertainty in predictive models.<n>Our primary contribution is the development of a metric that estimates potential epistemic uncertainty.<n>A batch sampling strategy based on Gaussian processes (GPs) is also proposed.<n>We test our approach on three unidimensional synthetic problems and a multi-dimensional dataset based on an agricultural field for selecting experimental fertilizer rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T21:21:47Z)
• Continuous Bayesian Model Selection for Multivariate Causal Discovery [22.945274948173182]
  We propose a scalable algorithm leveraging a continuous relaxation of the discrete model selection problem.<n>We employ the Causal Gaussian Process Conditional Density Estimator (CGP-CDE) as a Bayesian non-parametric model.<n>This matrix is then optimised using the marginal likelihood and an acyclicity regulariser, giving the maximum a posteriori causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T12:55:05Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference [8.753065246797561]
  Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. We propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T10:14:10Z)
• Quantifying predictive uncertainty of aphasia severity in stroke patients with sparse heteroscedastic Bayesian high-dimensional regression [47.1405366895538]
  Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. This paper proposes estimating high-dimensional heteroscedastic linear regression models using a heteroscedastic partitioned empirical Bayes Expectation Conditional Maximization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T22:06:29Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [78.120734120667]
  We propose model-based causal Bayesian optimization (MCBO) MCBO learns a full system model instead of only modeling intervention-reward pairs. Unlike in standard Bayesian optimization, our acquisition function cannot be evaluated in closed form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T14:28:21Z)
• BayesCap: Bayesian Identity Cap for Calibrated Uncertainty in Frozen Neural Networks [50.15201777970128]
  We propose BayesCap that learns a Bayesian identity mapping for the frozen model, allowing uncertainty estimation. BayesCap is a memory-efficient method that can be trained on a small fraction of the original dataset. We show the efficacy of our method on a wide variety of tasks with a diverse set of architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T12:50:09Z)
• Posterior temperature optimized Bayesian models for inverse problems in medical imaging [59.82184400837329]
  We present an unsupervised Bayesian approach to inverse problems in medical imaging using mean-field variational inference with a fully tempered posterior. We show that an optimized posterior temperature leads to improved accuracy and uncertainty estimation. Our source code is publicly available at calibrated.com/Cardio-AI/mfvi-dip-mia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T12:16:33Z)
• Contributions to Large Scale Bayesian Inference and Adversarial Machine Learning [0.0]
  The rampant adoption of ML methodologies has revealed that models are usually adopted to make decisions without taking into account the uncertainties in their predictions. We believe that developing ML systems that take into predictive account uncertainties and are robust against adversarial examples is a must for real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T23:02:47Z)
• Post-hoc loss-calibration for Bayesian neural networks [25.05373000435213]
  We develop methods for correcting approximate posterior predictive distributions encouraging them to prefer high-utility decisions. In contrast to previous work, our approach is agnostic to the choice of the approximate inference algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-13T13:53:27Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.