Practical Causal Evaluation Metrics for Biological Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12805v1
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 22:18:15 GMT
- Title: Practical Causal Evaluation Metrics for Biological Networks
- Authors: Noriaki Sato, Marco Scutari, Shuichi Kawano, Rui Yamaguchi, Seiya Imoto,
- Abstract summary: Estimating causal networks from biological data is a critical step in systems biology.<n>We developed a metric that takes the net effects of an intervention into account.<n>We found that our proposed metrics could identify a different algorithm as optimal compared to conventional metrics.
- Score: 2.0443308797642965
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Estimating causal networks from biological data is a critical step in systems biology. When evaluating the inferred network, assessing the networks based on their intervention effects is particularly important for downstream probabilistic reasoning and the identification of potential drug targets. In the context of gene regulatory network inference, biological databases are often used as reference sources. These databases typically describe relationships in a qualitative rather than quantitative manner. However, few evaluation metrics have been developed that take this qualitative nature into account. To address this, we developed a metric, the sign-augmented Structural Intervention Distance (sSID), and a weighted sSID that incorporates the net effects of the intervention. Through simulations and analyses of real transcriptomic datasets, we found that our proposed metrics could identify a different algorithm as optimal compared to conventional metrics, and the network selected by sSID had a superior performance in the classification task of clinical covariates using transcriptomic data. This suggests that sSID can distinguish networks that are structurally correct but functionally incorrect, highlighting its potential as a more biologically meaningful and practical evaluation metric.
Related papers
- A Multi-Resolution Benchmark Framework for Spatial Reasoning Assessment in Neural Networks [40.69150418258213]
This paper presents preliminary results in the definition of a comprehensive benchmark framework designed to evaluate spatial reasoning capabilities in neural networks.<n>The framework is currently being used to study the capabilities of nnU-Net.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T09:04:13Z) - Learning hidden cascades via classification [49.40566691717171]
intermediate indicators such as symptoms of infection are observable.<n>We propose a partial observability-aware Machine Learning framework to learn the characteristics of the spreading model.<n>We validate the method on synthetic networks and extend the study to a real-world insider trading network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T13:23:52Z) - Network Causal Effect Estimation In Graphical Models Of Contagion And Latent Confounding [2.654975444537834]
Key question in many network studies is whether the observed correlations between units are primarily due to contagion or latent confounding.<n>We propose network causal effect estimation strategies that provide unbiased and consistent estimates.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods with synthetic data and the validity of our assumptions using real-world networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-02T22:12:44Z) - A Review of Link Prediction Applications in Network Biology [2.7624021966289605]
Link prediction (LP) methodologies are instrumental in inferring missing or prospective associations within biological networks.
We systematically dissect the attributes of local, centrality, and embedding-based LP approaches, applied to static and dynamic biological networks.
We conclude the review with an exploration of the essential characteristics expected from future LP models, poised to advance our comprehension of the intricate interactions governing biological systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T04:23:51Z) - Physics Inspired Hybrid Attention for SAR Target Recognition [61.01086031364307]
We propose a physics inspired hybrid attention (PIHA) mechanism and the once-for-all (OFA) evaluation protocol to address the issues.
PIHA leverages the high-level semantics of physical information to activate and guide the feature group aware of local semantics of target.
Our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in 12 test scenarios with same ASC parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T14:39:41Z) - R-Mixup: Riemannian Mixup for Biological Networks [15.48899766304136]
We propose R-mixUP, a Mixup-based data augmentation technique that suits the symmetric positive definite (SPD) property of adjacency matrices from biological networks.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of R-mixUP with five real-world biological network datasets on both regression and classification tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T01:41:23Z) - Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe.
GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z) - CausalBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Network Inference from
Single-cell Perturbation Data [61.088705993848606]
We introduce CausalBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating causal inference methods on real-world interventional data.
CaulBench incorporates biologically-motivated performance metrics, including new distribution-based interventional metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T13:04:07Z) - EBOCA: Evidences for BiOmedical Concepts Association Ontology [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes EBOCA, an ontology that describes (i) biomedical domain concepts and associations between them, and (ii) evidences supporting these associations.
Test data coming from a subset of DISNET and automatic association extractions from texts has been transformed to create a Knowledge Graph that can be used in real scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-01T18:47:03Z) - Initial Study into Application of Feature Density and
Linguistically-backed Embedding to Improve Machine Learning-based
Cyberbullying Detection [54.83707803301847]
The research was conducted on a Formspring dataset provided in a Kaggle competition on automatic cyberbullying detection.
The study confirmed the effectiveness of Neural Networks in cyberbullying detection and the correlation between classifier performance and Feature Density.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-04T03:17:15Z) - A Locally Adaptive Algorithm for Multiple Testing with Network Structure [4.441085538537119]
This paper introduces a flexible framework designed to integrate a broad range of auxiliary information into the inference process.<n>LASLA is specifically motivated by the challenges posed by network-structured data.<n>It also proves highly effective with other types of side information, such as spatial locations and multiple auxiliary sequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-22T04:58:03Z) - NOTMAD: Estimating Bayesian Networks with Sample-Specific Structures and
Parameters [70.55488722439239]
We present NOTMAD, which learns to mix archetypal networks according to sample context.
We demonstrate the utility of NOTMAD and sample-specific network inference through analysis and experiments, including patient-specific gene expression networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:17:34Z) - Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representations [26.78835065137714]
We provide a family of metric spaces that quantify representational dissimilarity.
We modify existing representational similarity measures based on canonical correlation analysis to satisfy the triangle inequality.
We identify relationships between neural representations that are interpretable in terms of anatomical features and model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T19:48:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.