Multi-Agent Multimodal Large Language Model Framework for Automated Interpretation of Fuel Efficiency Analytics in Public Transportation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13476v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:14:17 GMT
- Title: Multi-Agent Multimodal Large Language Model Framework for Automated Interpretation of Fuel Efficiency Analytics in Public Transportation
- Authors: Zhipeng Ma, Ali Rida Bahja, Andreas Burgdorf, André Pomp, Tobias Meisen, Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, Zheng Grace Ma,
- Abstract summary: This study presents a multi-agent framework that automates data narration and energy insight generation.<n>The framework coordinates three specialized agents, including a data narration agent, an LLM-as-a-judge agent, and an optional human-in-the-loop evaluator.<n>The system is validated through a real-world case study on public bus transportation in Northern Jutland, Denmark.
- Score: 8.704530773510411
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Enhancing fuel efficiency in public transportation requires the integration of complex multimodal data into interpretable, decision-relevant insights. However, traditional analytics and visualization methods often yield fragmented outputs that demand extensive human interpretation, limiting scalability and consistency. This study presents a multi-agent framework that leverages multimodal large language models (LLMs) to automate data narration and energy insight generation. The framework coordinates three specialized agents, including a data narration agent, an LLM-as-a-judge agent, and an optional human-in-the-loop evaluator, to iteratively transform analytical artifacts into coherent, stakeholder-oriented reports. The system is validated through a real-world case study on public bus transportation in Northern Jutland, Denmark, where fuel efficiency data from 4006 trips are analyzed using Gaussian Mixture Model clustering. Comparative experiments across five state-of-the-art LLMs and three prompting paradigms identify GPT-4.1 mini with Chain-of-Thought prompting as the optimal configuration, achieving 97.3% narrative accuracy while balancing interpretability and computational cost. The findings demonstrate that multi-agent orchestration significantly enhances factual precision, coherence, and scalability in LLM-based reporting. The proposed framework establishes a replicable and domain-adaptive methodology for AI-driven narrative generation and decision support in energy informatics.
Related papers
- Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining [125.34714978184638]
We provide empirical clarity through controlled, from-scratch pretraining experiments.<n>We adopt the Transfusion framework, using next-token prediction for language and diffusion for vision.<n>We demonstrate that the MoE architecture harmonizes this scaling asymmetry by providing the high model capacity required by language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T18:58:00Z) - AMUSE: Audio-Visual Benchmark and Alignment Framework for Agentic Multi-Speaker Understanding [73.05946667683259]
Recent large language models (MLLMs) show strong perception but struggle in multi-speaker, dialogue-centric settings.<n>We introduce AMUSE, a benchmark designed around tasks that are inherently agentic.<n>We propose RAFT, a data-efficient agentic alignment framework that integrates reward optimization with intrinsic multimodal self-evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T07:01:47Z) - A Modular, Data-Free Pipeline for Multi-Label Intention Recognition in Transportation Agentic AI Applications [12.25149118082394]
A modular, data-free pipeline for multi-label intention recognition is proposed for agentic AI applications in transportation.<n>Unlike traditional intent recognition systems that depend on large, annotated corpora, our approach eliminates the need for costly data collection.<n>Our system seamlessly routes user queries to task-specific modules, laying the groundwork for fully autonomous, intention-aware agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T11:08:08Z) - Multi-Agent Data Visualization and Narrative Generation [1.935127147843886]
We present a lightweight multi-agent system that automates the data analysis workflow.<n>Our approach combines a hybrid multi-agent architecture with deterministic components, strategically externalizing critical logic.<n>The system delivers granular, modular outputs that enable surgical modifications without full regeneration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-30T12:39:55Z) - MCP-Orchestrated Multi-Agent System for Automated Disinformation Detection [84.75972919995398]
This paper presents a multi-agent system that uses relation extraction to detect disinformation in news articles.<n>The proposed Agentic AI system combines four agents: (i) a machine learning agent (logistic regression), (ii) a Wikipedia knowledge check agent, and (iv) a web-scraped data analyzer.<n>Results demonstrate that the multi-agent ensemble achieves 95.3% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.964, significantly outperforming individual agents and traditional approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T19:14:48Z) - Truth in the Few: High-Value Data Selection for Efficient Multi-Modal Reasoning [71.3533541927459]
We propose a novel data selection paradigm termed Activation Reasoning Potential (RAP)<n>RAP identifies cognitive samples by estimating each sample's potential to stimulate genuine multi-modal reasoning.<n>Our RAP method consistently achieves superior performance using only 9.3% of the training data, while reducing computational costs by over 43%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T08:40:24Z) - AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs [24.403284945948272]
AutoJudger is an agent-driven framework for efficient and adaptive benchmarking of multimodal large language models.<n>AutoJudger employs the Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate the question difficulty and an autonomous evaluation agent to dynamically select the most informative test questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T16:17:15Z) - AutoLogi: Automated Generation of Logic Puzzles for Evaluating Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [86.83875864328984]
We propose an automated method for synthesizing open-ended logic puzzles, and use it to develop a bilingual benchmark, AutoLogi.<n>Our approach features program-based verification and controllable difficulty levels, enabling more reliable evaluation that better distinguishes models' reasoning abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T07:02:31Z) - Enhancing Travel Choice Modeling with Large Language Models: A Prompt-Learning Approach [6.913791588789051]
We introduce a novel prompt-learning-based Large Language Model(LLM) framework that significantly improves prediction accuracy and provides explicit explanations for individual predictions.
We tested the framework's efficacy using two widely used choice datasets: London Passenger Mode Choice (LPMC) and Optima-Mode collected in Switzerland.
The results indicate that the LLM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art deep learning methods and discrete choice models in predicting people's choices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T13:46:08Z) - Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information
Decomposition Framework [89.8609061423685]
We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the degree of redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy relating input modalities with an output task.
To validate PID estimation, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets where the PID is known and on large-scale multimodal benchmarks.
We demonstrate their usefulness in (1) quantifying interactions within multimodal datasets, (2) quantifying interactions captured by multimodal models, (3) principled approaches for model selection, and (4) three real-world case studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T18:59:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.