Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13782v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 03:09:55 GMT
• Title: Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models
• Authors: Xiaoxing Lian, Aidong Yang, Jun Zhu, Peng Wang, Yue Zhang,
• Abstract summary: spatial reasoning is a fundamental component of human cognition.<n>Current large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across logical inference, problem solving, and decision making.<n>We hypothesize that imagination, the internal simulation of spatial states, is the dominant reasoning mechanism within a spatial world model.
• Score: 23.12717700882611
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs), such as DeepSeek R1,OpenAI o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro, have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across logical inference, problem solving, and decision making. However, spatial reasoning:a fundamental component of human cognition that includes mental rotation, navigation, and spatial relationship comprehension remains a significant challenge for current advanced VLMs. We hypothesize that imagination, the internal simulation of spatial states, is the dominant reasoning mechanism within a spatial world model. To test this hypothesis and systematically probe current VLM spatial reasoning mechanisms, we introduce SpatiaLite, a fully synthetic benchmark that jointly measures spatial reasoning accuracy and reasoning efficiency. Comprehensive experiments reveal three key findings. First, advanced VLMs predominantly rely on linguistic representations for reasoning and imagination, resulting in significant deficiencies on visual centric tasks that demand perceptual spatial relations and 3D geometry transformations such as mental rotation or projection prediction. Second, advanced VLMs exhibit severe inefficiency in their current spatial reasoning mechanisms, with token usage growing rapidly as transformation complexity increases. Third, we propose an Imagery Driven Framework (IDF) for data synthesis and training, which can implicitly construct an internal world model that is critical for spatial reasoning in VLMs. Building on SpatiaLite, this work delineates the spatial reasoning limits and patterns of advanced VLMs, identifies key shortcomings, and informs future advances

Related papers

• Thinking with Blueprints: Assisting Vision-Language Models in Spatial Reasoning via Structured Object Representation [52.605647992080485]
  spatial reasoning advances vision-language models from visual perception toward semantic understanding.<n>We integrate the cognitive concept of an object-centric blueprint into spatial reasoning.<n>Our method consistently outperforms existing vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T10:38:26Z)
• Seeing through Imagination: Learning Scene Geometry via Implicit Spatial World Modeling [68.14113731953971]
  This paper introduces MILO, an Implicit spatIaL wOrld modeling paradigm that simulates human-like imagination.<n>We show that our approach significantly enhances spatial reasoning capabilities across multiple baselines and benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T16:01:41Z)
• How Far are VLMs from Visual Spatial Intelligence? A Benchmark-Driven Perspective [103.44502230776352]
  We present a systematic investigation of Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR) in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>We categorize spatial intelligence into three levels of capability, ie, basic perception, spatial understanding, spatial planning, and curate SIBench, a spatial intelligence benchmark encompassing nearly 20 open-source datasets across 23 task settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T12:00:14Z)
• SIRI-Bench: Challenging VLMs' Spatial Intelligence through Complex Reasoning Tasks [51.774165536666864]
  We introduce SIRI-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models' structural spatial intelligence.<n>Bench comprises 9,000 video-question-answer triplets, where each problem is embedded in a realistic 3D scene.<n> Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle significantly on SIRI-Bench, underscoring the challenge of structural spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T13:40:00Z)
• OmniSpatial: Towards Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models [17.976302783133956]
  We introduce OmniSpatial, a benchmark for spatial reasoning grounded in cognitive psychology.<n>It covers four major categories: dynamic reasoning, complex spatial logic, spatial interaction, and perspective-taking.<n>Through careful manual annotation, we construct over 8.4K question-answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:58:29Z)
• ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [68.46716645478661]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [69.56484419619919]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation [7.659514491338669]
  Current vision-language models may grasp basic spatial cues but struggle with the multi-dimensional spatial reasoning necessary for human-like understanding and real-world applications.<n>We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework supported by a new human-annotated dataset.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant deficiencies, especially in reasoning about distance and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)
• Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning [36.588008658084895]
  Vision language models (VLMs) perform well on many tasks but often fail at spatial reasoning.<n>Our evaluation shows that state-of-the-art VLMs give implausible or incorrect answers to composite spatial problems.<n>We enhance 2D spatial reasoning in VLMs by training them only on basic spatial capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.