Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models is Concentrated in Dynamic Confusion Zones
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15208v1
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 07:59:34 GMT
- Title: Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models is Concentrated in Dynamic Confusion Zones
- Authors: Ranfei Chen, Ming Chen, Kaifei Wang,
- Abstract summary: We propose Adaptive Trajectory Policy Optimization (ATPO), a lightweight step-selection strategy that dynamically reallocates gradient updates to high-leverage steps without changing the RL objective, rewards, or compute budget.<n>ATPO delivers substantial gains in reasoning accuracy and training stability across benchmarks, showing that exploiting trajectory dynamics is key to advancing dLLM RL.
- Score: 3.7312377768685714
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) are rapidly emerging alongside autoregressive models as a powerful paradigm for complex reasoning, with reinforcement learning increasingly used for downstream alignment. Existing trajectory-based RL methods uniformly allocate policy gradients across denoising steps, implicitly treating all steps as equally important. We challenge this assumption by analyzing trajectories with several step-level metrics: entropy-based uncertainty, Confidence-Margin (CM) uncertainty, and Rate of Entropy Change (RoEC). These reveal structured "zones of confusion": transient spikes in uncertainty and instability that strongly predict final success or failure, while most steps remain stable. We propose Adaptive Trajectory Policy Optimization (ATPO), a lightweight step-selection strategy that dynamically reallocates gradient updates to these high-leverage steps without changing the RL objective, rewards, or compute budget. Using a hybrid RoEC+CM rule, ATPO delivers substantial gains in reasoning accuracy and training stability across benchmarks, showing that exploiting trajectory dynamics is key to advancing dLLM RL.
Related papers
- Stabilizing Policy Optimization via Logits Convexity [59.242732612484474]
We show that the convexity of the supervised fine-tuning loss with respect to model logits plays a key role in enabling stable training.<n>Motivated by this observation, we propose Logits Convex Optimization (LCO), a simple yet effective policy optimization framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T07:40:12Z) - Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - Principled RL for Diffusion LLMs Emerges from a Sequence-Level Perspective [85.06838178922791]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective for autoregressive language models.<n>But adapting these methods to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) presents fundamental challenges.<n>We propose a principled RL framework that treats entire sequence generation as a single action and uses the ELBO as a tractable sequence-level likelihood proxy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-03T13:05:32Z) - Iterative Refinement of Flow Policies in Probability Space for Online Reinforcement Learning [56.47948583452555]
We introduce the Stepwise Flow Policy (SWFP) framework, founded on the key insight that discretizing the flow matching inference process via a fixed-step Euler scheme aligns it with the variational Jordan-Kinderlehrer-Otto principle from optimal transport.<n>SWFP decomposes the global flow into a sequence of small, incremental transformations between proximate distributions.<n>This decomposition yields an efficient algorithm that fine-tunes pre-trained flows via a cascade of small flow blocks, offering significant advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T07:43:51Z) - ADARL: Adaptive Low-Rank Structures for Robust Policy Learning under Uncertainty [28.291179179647795]
We propose textbfAdaptive Rank Representation (AdaRL), a bi-level optimization framework that improves robustness.<n>At the lower level, AdaRL performs policy optimization under fixed-rank constraints with dynamics sampled from a Wasserstein ball around a centroid model.<n>At the upper level, it adaptively adjusts the rank to balance the bias--variance trade-off, projecting policy parameters onto a low-rank manifold.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T20:05:34Z) - ResAD: Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [64.42138266293202]
ResAD is a Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling framework.<n>It reframes the learning task to predict the residual deviation from an inertial reference.<n>On the NAVSIM benchmark, ResAD achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 88.6 using a vanilla diffusion policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:59:36Z) - Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning [77.92320830700797]
Reinforcement Learning has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates.<n>The algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T12:29:32Z) - Adversarial Diffusion for Robust Reinforcement Learning [46.44328012099217]
We introduce Adversarial Diffusion for Robust Reinforcement Learning (AD-RRL)<n>AD-RRL guides the diffusion process to generate worst-case trajectories during training, effectively optimizing the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) of the cumulative return.<n> Empirical results across standard benchmarks show that AD-RRL achieves superior robustness and performance compared to existing robust RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T12:34:35Z) - Efficient Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Preference Re-ranking and Representation-based Reward Modeling [84.00480999255628]
Reinforcement Learning algorithms for safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) encounter the challenge of distribution shift.<n>Current approaches typically address this issue through online sampling from the target policy.<n>We propose a new framework that leverages the model's intrinsic safety judgment capability to extract reward signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T06:40:34Z) - ROCM: RLHF on consistency models [8.905375742101707]
We propose a reward optimization framework for applying RLHF to consistency models.<n>We investigate various $f$-divergences as regularization strategies, striking a balance between reward and model consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T11:19:48Z) - Avoiding mode collapse in diffusion models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning [0.0]
Fine-tuning foundation models via reinforcement learning (RL) has proven promising for aligning to downstream objectives.
We exploit the hierarchical nature of diffusion models (DMs) and train them dynamically at each epoch with a tailored RL method.
We show that models trained with HRF achieve better preservation of diversity in downstream tasks, thus enhancing the fine-tuning robustness and at uncompromising mean rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T19:06:23Z) - Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks.
We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level.
We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.