What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15593v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:32:18 GMT
• Title: What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity
• Authors: Alexis Audran-Reiss, Jordi Armengol Estapé, Karen Hambardzumyan, Amar Budhiraja, Martin Josifoski, Edan Toledo, Rishi Hazra, Despoina Magka, Michael Shvartsman, Parth Pathak, Justine T Kao, Lucia Cipolina-Kun, Bhavul Gauri, Jean-Christophe Gagnon-Audet, Emanuel Tewolde, Jenny Zhang, Taco Cohen, Yossi Adi, Tatiana Shavrina, Yoram Bachrach,
• Abstract summary: We examine the role that ideation diversity plays in agent performance.<n>Different models and agent scaffolds yield varying degrees of ideation diversity.<n> higher-performing agents tend to have increased ideation diversity.
• Score: 40.27555449103923
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: AI research agents offer the promise to accelerate scientific progress by automating the design, implementation, and training of machine learning models. However, the field is still in its infancy, and the key factors driving the success or failure of agent trajectories are not fully understood. We examine the role that ideation diversity plays in agent performance. First, we analyse agent trajectories on MLE-bench, a well-known benchmark to evaluate AI research agents, across different models and agent scaffolds. Our analysis reveals that different models and agent scaffolds yield varying degrees of ideation diversity, and that higher-performing agents tend to have increased ideation diversity. Further, we run a controlled experiment where we modify the degree of ideation diversity, demonstrating that higher ideation diversity results in stronger performance. Finally, we strengthen our results by examining additional evaluation metrics beyond the standard medal-based scoring of MLE-bench, showing that our findings still hold across other agent performance metrics.

Related papers

• AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agent [57.10083973844841]
  AgentArk is a novel framework to distill multi-agent dynamics into the weights of a single model.<n>We investigate three hierarchical distillation strategies across various models, tasks, scaling, and scenarios.<n>By shifting the burden of computation from inference to training, the distilled models preserve the efficiency of one agent while exhibiting strong reasoning and self-correction performance of multiple agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T19:18:28Z)
• Multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Agentic Verifier for AI Agents [131.46008226323423]
  Argos is a principled multimodal reward agent to train reasoning models for agentic tasks.<n>By leveraging our agentic verifier across both SFT data and RL training, our model achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T04:42:47Z)
• AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress [71.02263260394261]
  Large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks.<n>We build process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process.<n>AgentPRM captures both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T14:57:54Z)
• Exploring Design of Multi-Agent LLM Dialogues for Research Ideation [4.561804070932164]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support creative tasks such as research idea generation.<n>We compare different configurations of agent roles, number of agents, and dialogue depth to understand how these factors influence the novelty and feasibility of generated ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T06:53:46Z)
• OAgents: An Empirical Study of Building Effective Agents [46.50371876218872]
  We study the impact of popular design choices in key agent components in a fair and rigorous manner.<n>Based on our findings, we build and open-source OAgents, a new foundation agent framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:59:02Z)
• Understanding Software Engineering Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study [15.97770416681533]
  Software engineering agents (SWE agents) operate autonomously by interpreting user input and responding to environmental feedback.<n>We present the first systematic study of SWE agent behavior through the lens of execution traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T00:41:54Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• Episodic Future Thinking Mechanism for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [2.992602379681373]
  We introduce an episodic future thinking (EFT) mechanism for a reinforcement learning (RL) agent. We first develop a multi-character policy that captures diverse characters with an ensemble of heterogeneous policies. Once the character is inferred, the agent predicts the upcoming actions of target agents and simulates the potential future scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T19:12:42Z)
• DCIR: Dynamic Consistency Intrinsic Reward for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [84.22561239481901]
  We propose a new approach that enables agents to learn whether their behaviors should be consistent with that of other agents. We evaluate DCIR in multiple environments including Multi-agent Particle, Google Research Football and StarCraft II Micromanagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T06:03:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.