Understanding Software Engineering Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08311v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:41:54 GMT
• Title: Understanding Software Engineering Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study
• Authors: Ira Ceka, Saurabh Pujar, Shyam Ramji, Luca Buratti, Gail Kaiser, Baishakhi Ray,
• Abstract summary: Software engineering agents (SWE agents) operate autonomously by interpreting user input and responding to environmental feedback.<n>We present the first systematic study of SWE agent behavior through the lens of execution traces.
• Score: 15.97770416681533
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of large language models (LLMs), software engineering agents (SWE agents) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for automating a range of software tasks -- from code generation and repair to test case synthesis. These agents operate autonomously by interpreting user input and responding to environmental feedback. While various agent architectures have demonstrated strong empirical performance, the internal decision-making worfklows that drive their behavior remain poorly understood. Deeper insight into these workflows hold promise for improving both agent reliability and efficiency. In this work, we present the first systematic study of SWE agent behavior through the lens of execution traces. Our contributions are as follows: (1) we propose the first taxonomy of decision-making pathways across five representative agents; (2) using this taxonomy, we identify three core components essential to agent success -- bug localization, patch generation, and reproduction test generation -- and study each in depth; (3) we study the impact of test generation on successful patch production; and analyze strategies that can lead to successful test generation; (4) we further conduct the first large-scale code clone analysis comparing agent-generated and developer-written patches and provide a qualitative study revealing structural and stylistic differences in patch content. Together, these findings offer novel insights into agent design and open avenues for building agents that are both more effective and more aligned with human development practices.

Related papers

• Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories [18.129031749321058]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly employed to automate complex software engineering tasks.<n>Despite their widespread adoption, the internal decision-making processes of these agents remain largely unexplored.<n>We present a large-scale empirical study of the thought-action-result trajectories of three state-of-the-art LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T16:34:52Z)
• OAgents: An Empirical Study of Building Effective Agents [46.50371876218872]
  We study the impact of popular design choices in key agent components in a fair and rigorous manner.<n>Based on our findings, we build and open-source OAgents, a new foundation agent framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:59:02Z)
• Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agents [51.790752085445384]
  Scaling test time compute has shown remarkable success in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we conduct the first systematic exploration of applying test-time scaling methods to language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T17:59:47Z)
• AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z)
• Can AI Master Econometrics? Evidence from Econometrics AI Agent on Expert-Level Tasks [9.52446148818128]
  We develop an Econometrics AI Agent'' built on the open-source MetaGPT framework.<n>This agent exhibits outstanding performance in: (1) planning econometric tasks strategically, (2) generating and executing code, (3) employing error-based reflection for improved robustness, and (4) allowing iterative refinement through multi-round conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T06:34:42Z)
• Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research [32.92036657863354]
  Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks.<n>However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison.<n>We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and abstraction framework that addresses these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T08:46:23Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
  Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z)
• Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z)
• MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
  We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.<n>This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.<n>We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z)
• Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
  We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z)
• CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark [11.794931453828974]
  CORE-Bench is a benchmark consisting of 270 tasks based on 90 scientific papers across three disciplines (computer science, social science, and medicine) We provide an evaluation system to measure the accuracy of agents in a fast and parallelizable way. The best agent achieved an accuracy of 21% on the hardest task, showing the vast scope for improvement in automating routine scientific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:13:19Z)
• Learning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive Agents [58.77710337157665]
  Tool learning empowers large language models (LLMs) as agents to use external tools and extend their utility. We propose ConAgents, a Cooperative and interactive Agents framework, which coordinates three specialized agents for tool selection, tool execution, and action calibration separately. Our experiments on three datasets show that the LLMs, when equipped with ConAgents, outperform baselines with substantial improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T15:08:16Z)
• An In-depth Survey of Large Language Model-based Artificial Intelligence Agents [11.774961923192478]
  We have explored the core differences and characteristics between LLM-based AI agents and traditional AI agents. We conducted an in-depth analysis of the key components of AI agents, including planning, memory, and tool use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T11:25:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.