Tracking financial crime through code and law: a review of regtech applications in anti-money laundering and terrorism financing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15764v1
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:51:08 GMT
- Title: Tracking financial crime through code and law: a review of regtech applications in anti-money laundering and terrorism financing
- Authors: Mariam El Harras, My Abdelouhab Salahddine,
- Abstract summary: Regulatory technology (RegTech) is transforming financial compliance by integrating advanced information technologies to strengthen anti money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML CFT)<n>Recent literature suggests that such technologies represent more than just an efficiency tool; they mark a paradigm shift in regulation and the evolution of financial oversight.<n>This paper aims to provide a narrative review of recent RegTech applications in financial crime prevention, with a focus on key compliance domains.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Regulatory technology (RegTech) is transforming financial compliance by integrating advanced information technologies to strengthen anti money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML CFT) frameworks. Recent literature suggests that such technologies represent more than just an efficiency tool; they mark a paradigm shift in regulation and the evolution of financial oversight (Kurum, 2023). This paper aims to provide a narrative review of recent RegTech applications in financial crime prevention, with a focus on key compliance domains. A structured literature review was conducted to examine publications between 2020 and 2024 with a thematic synthesis of findings related to customer due diligence (CDD) and know your customer (KYC), transaction monitoring, regulatory reporting and compliance automation, information sharing and cross border cooperation, as well as cost efficiency. Findings reveal that RegTech solutions give financial institutions more responsibility for detecting and managing financial crime risks, making them more active players in compliance processes traditionally overseen by regulators. The combined use of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and big data also generates synergistic effects that improve compliance outcomes beyond what these technologies achieve individually. This demonstrates the strategic relevance of integrated RegTech approaches.
Related papers
- SoK: Web3 RegTech for Cryptocurrency VASP AML/CFT Compliance [14.435108642393319]
This paper examines how blockchain-native RegTech solutions leverage distributed ledger properties to enable novel compliance capabilities.<n>We develop three organizing the Web3 RegTech domain: a regulatory paradigm evolution framework across ten dimensions, a compliance protocol taxonomy encompassing five verification layers, and a RegTech lifecycle framework spanning preventive, real-time, and investigative phases.<n>Our analysis reveals critical gaps between academic innovation and industry deployment, alongside persistent challenges in cross-chain tracking, DeFi interaction analysis, privacy protocol monitoring, and scalability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-31T14:31:29Z) - Anti-Regulatory AI: How "AI Safety" is Leveraged Against Regulatory Oversight [0.9883261192383612]
AI companies increasingly develop and deploy privacy-enhancing technologies, bias-constraining measures, evaluation frameworks, and alignment techniques.<n>This paper examines the ulterior function of these technologies as mechanisms of legal influence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T19:35:10Z) - Agentic AI for Financial Crime Compliance [0.0]
This paper presents the design and deployment of an agentic AI system for financial crime compliance (FCC) in digitally native financial platforms.<n>The contribution includes a reference architecture, a real-world prototype, and insights into how Agentic AI can reconfigure under regulatory constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T14:53:51Z) - Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z) - SoK: Advances and Open Problems in Web Tracking [71.54586748169943]
Web tracking is a pervasive and opaque practice that enables personalized advertising, and conversion tracking.<n>Web tracking is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation driven by shifts in the advertising industry, the adoption of anti-tracking countermeasures by browsers, and the growing enforcement of emerging privacy regulations.<n>This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) aims to consolidate and synthesize this wide-ranging research, offering a comprehensive overview of the technical mechanisms, countermeasures, and regulations that shape the modern and rapidly evolving web tracking landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T23:30:54Z) - In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI [93.33036653316591]
We call for three interventions to advance system safety.<n>First, we propose using standardized AI flaw reports and rules of engagement for researchers.<n>Second, we propose GPAI system providers adopt broadly-scoped flaw disclosure programs.<n>Third, we advocate for the development of improved infrastructure to coordinate distribution of flaw reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T05:09:46Z) - Regulating Ai In Financial Services: Legal Frameworks And Compliance Challenges [0.0]
Article examines the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in financial services.<n>It highlights how AI-driven processes, from fraud detection to algorithmic trading, offer efficiency gains yet introduce significant risks.<n>The study compares regulatory approaches across major jurisdictions such as the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T14:29:09Z) - Deep Learning Approaches for Anti-Money Laundering on Mobile Transactions: Review, Framework, and Directions [51.43521977132062]
Money laundering is a financial crime that obscures the origin of illicit funds.<n>The proliferation of mobile payment platforms and smart IoT devices has significantly complicated anti-money laundering investigations.<n>This paper conducts a comprehensive review of deep learning solutions and the challenges associated with their use in AML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T05:19:44Z) - Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z) - Survey on Foundation Models for Prognostics and Health Management in
Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems [1.1034992901877594]
Large-scale foundation models (LFMs) like BERT and GPT signifies a significant advancement in AI technology.
ChatGPT stands as a remarkable accomplishment within this research paradigm, harboring potential for General Artificial Intelligence.
Considering the ongoing enhancement in data acquisition technology and data processing capability, LFMs are anticipated to assume a crucial role in the PHM domain of ICPS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T09:58:46Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - Design Challenges for GDPR RegTech [0.3867363075280544]
The Accountability Principle of the methodologies requires that an organisation can demonstrate compliance with the regulations.
A survey of compliance software solutions shows significant gaps in their ability to demonstrate compliance.
RegTech has brought great success to financial compliance, resulting in reduced risk, cost saving and enhanced financial regulatory compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T18:55:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.