Distributed Agent Reasoning Across Independent Systems With Strict Data Locality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16292v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:13:20 GMT
- Title: Distributed Agent Reasoning Across Independent Systems With Strict Data Locality
- Authors: Daniel Vaughan, Kateřina Vaughan,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a proof-of-concept demonstration of agent-to-agent communication across distributed systems.<n>Agents communicate through OperationRelay calls, exchanging concise natural-language summaries.<n>The goal of this prototype is intentionally limited: to demonstrate feasibility, not to provide a clinically validated, production-ready system.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a proof-of-concept demonstration of agent-to-agent communication across distributed systems, using only natural-language messages and without shared identifiers, structured schemas, or centralised data exchange. The prototype explores how multiple organisations (represented here as a Clinic, Insurer, and Specialist Network) can cooperate securely via pseudonymised case tokens, local data lookups, and controlled operational boundaries. The system uses Orpius as the underlying platform for multi-agent orchestration, tool execution, and privacy-preserving communication. All agents communicate through OperationRelay calls, exchanging concise natural-language summaries. Each agent operates on its own data (such as synthetic clinic records, insurance enrolment tables, and clinical guidance extracts), and none receives or reconstructs patient identity. The Clinic computes an HMAC-based pseudonymous token, the Insurer evaluates coverage rules and consults the Specialist agent, and the Specialist returns an appropriateness recommendation. The goal of this prototype is intentionally limited: to demonstrate feasibility, not to provide a clinically validated, production-ready system. No clinician review was conducted, and no evaluation beyond basic functional runs was performed. The work highlights architectural patterns, privacy considerations, and communication flows that enable distributed reasoning among specialised agents while keeping data local to each organisation. We conclude by outlining opportunities for more rigorous evaluation and future research in decentralised multi-agent systems.
Related papers
- MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z) - EvoClinician: A Self-Evolving Agent for Multi-Turn Medical Diagnosis via Test-Time Evolutionary Learning [72.70291772077738]
We propose Med-Inquire, a new benchmark designed to evaluate an agent's ability to perform multi-turn diagnosis.<n>We then introduce EvoClinician, a self-evolving agent that learns efficient diagnostic strategies at test time.<n>Our experiments show EvoClinician outperforms continual learning baselines and other self-evolving agents like memory agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T13:26:18Z) - AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z) - Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Multi-Agent System for Healthcare: A Gossip Protocol Approach to Secure Medical Message Propagation [0.0]
This paper presents a novel Byzantine fault-tolerant multi-agent system specifically designed for healthcare applications.<n>Our system employs specialized AI agents for diagnosis, treatment planning, emergency response, and data analysis.<n>We implement a gossip protocol for decentralized message dissemination, achieving consensus with 2f + 1 votes while maintaining system operation even under Byzantine failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T03:32:54Z) - CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z) - DispatchMAS: Fusing taxonomy and artificial intelligence agents for emergency medical services [49.70819009392778]
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer opportunities to augment dispatchers.<n>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a taxonomy-grounded, multi-agent system for simulating realistic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T08:01:21Z) - Agentic-AI Healthcare: Multilingual, Privacy-First Framework with MCP Agents [1.2995632804090198]
Agentic-AI Healthcare is a privacy-aware, multilingual, and explainable research prototype developed as a single-investigator project.<n>The platform integrates a dedicated Privacy and Compliance Layer that applies role-based access control (RBAC), AES-GCM field-level encryption, and tamper-evident audit logging.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T21:25:52Z) - Automated Clinical Problem Detection from SOAP Notes using a Collaborative Multi-Agent LLM Architecture [8.072932739333309]
We introduce a collaborative multi-agent system (MAS) that models a clinical consultation team to address this gap.<n>The system is tasked with identifying clinical problems by analyzing only the Subjective (S) and Objective (O) sections of SOAP notes.<n>A Manager agent orchestrates a dynamically assigned team of specialist agents who engage in a hierarchical, iterative debate to reach a consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T17:31:24Z) - MCP-Orchestrated Multi-Agent System for Automated Disinformation Detection [84.75972919995398]
This paper presents a multi-agent system that uses relation extraction to detect disinformation in news articles.<n>The proposed Agentic AI system combines four agents: (i) a machine learning agent (logistic regression), (ii) a Wikipedia knowledge check agent, and (iv) a web-scraped data analyzer.<n>Results demonstrate that the multi-agent ensemble achieves 95.3% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.964, significantly outperforming individual agents and traditional approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T19:14:48Z) - GEMA-Score: Granular Explainable Multi-Agent Scoring Framework for Radiology Report Evaluation [7.838068874909676]
Granular Explainable Multi-Agent Score (GEMA-Score) conducts both objective and subjective evaluation through a large language model-based multi-agent workflow.<n>GEMA-Score achieves the highest correlation with human expert evaluations on a public dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T11:42:22Z) - Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice with Interactive Sequence [68.05876437208505]
We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow.<n>We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z) - AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments [2.567146936147657]
We introduce AgentClinic, a multimodal agent benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLM) in simulated clinical environments.<n>We find that solving MedQA problems in the sequential decision-making format of AgentClinic is considerably more challenging, resulting in diagnostic accuracies that can drop to below a tenth of the original accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T17:38:53Z) - Federated Offline Reinforcement Learning [55.326673977320574]
We propose a multi-site Markov decision process model that allows for both homogeneous and heterogeneous effects across sites.
We design the first federated policy optimization algorithm for offline RL with sample complexity.
We give a theoretical guarantee for the proposed algorithm, where the suboptimality for the learned policies is comparable to the rate as if data is not distributed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-11T18:03:26Z) - Self-supervised Answer Retrieval on Clinical Notes [68.87777592015402]
We introduce CAPR, a rule-based self-supervision objective for training Transformer language models for domain-specific passage matching.
We apply our objective in four Transformer-based architectures: Contextual Document Vectors, Bi-, Poly- and Cross-encoders.
We report that CAPR outperforms strong baselines in the retrieval of domain-specific passages and effectively generalizes across rule-based and human-labeled passages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-02T10:42:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.