MultiPriv: Benchmarking Individual-Level Privacy Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16940v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 04:33:11 GMT
• Title: MultiPriv: Benchmarking Individual-Level Privacy Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Xiongtao Sun, Hui Li, Jiaming Zhang, Yujie Yang, Kaili Liu, Ruxin Feng, Wen Jun Tan, Wei Yang Bryan Lim,
• Abstract summary: Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate sophisticated reasoning, escalating privacy risks.<n>Current privacy benchmarks are structurally insufficient for this new threat.<n>We propose textbfMultiPriv, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate individual-level privacy reasoning.
• Score: 14.942122955210436
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate sophisticated reasoning, escalating privacy risks beyond simple attribute perception to individual-level linkage. Current privacy benchmarks are structurally insufficient for this new threat, as they primarily evaluate privacy perception while failing to address the more critical risk of privacy reasoning: a VLM's ability to infer and link distributed information to construct individual profiles. To address this critical gap, we propose \textbf{MultiPriv}, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate individual-level privacy reasoning in VLMs. We introduce the \textbf{Privacy Perception and Reasoning (PPR)} framework and construct a novel, bilingual multimodal dataset to support it. The dataset uniquely features a core component of synthetic individual profiles where identifiers (e.g., faces, names) are meticulously linked to sensitive attributes. This design enables nine challenging tasks evaluating the full PPR spectrum, from attribute detection to cross-image re-identification and chained inference. We conduct a large-scale evaluation of over 50 foundational and commercial VLMs. Our analysis reveals: (1) Many VLMs possess significant, unmeasured reasoning-based privacy risks. (2) Perception-level metrics are poor predictors of these reasoning risks, revealing a critical evaluation gap. (3) Existing safety alignments are inconsistent and ineffective against such reasoning-based attacks. MultiPriv exposes systemic vulnerabilities and provides the necessary framework for developing robust, privacy-preserving VLMs.

Related papers

• VoxPrivacy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Interactional Privacy of Speech Language Models [25.266028200777317]
  Speech Language Models (SLMs) are expected to distinguish between users to manage information flow appropriately.<n>Current SLM benchmarks test dialogue ability but overlook speaker identity.<n>We introduce VoxPrivacy, the first benchmark designed to evaluate interactional privacy in SLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T06:22:14Z)
• Auditing M-LLMs for Privacy Risks: A Synthetic Benchmark and Evaluation Framework [7.493288948235459]
  PRISM is a large-scale synthetic benchmark designed to evaluate cross-modal privacy risks.<n> PRISM is the first multi-modal, multi-dimensional and fine-grained synthesized dataset.<n>We evaluate the inference capabilities of six leading M-LLMs on PRISM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T07:23:21Z)
• VoxGuard: Evaluating User and Attribute Privacy in Speech via Membership Inference Attacks [51.68795949691009]
  We introduce VoxGuard, a framework grounded in differential privacy and membership inference.<n>For attributes, we show that simple transparent attacks recover gender and accent with near-perfect accuracy even after anonymization.<n>Our results demonstrate that EER substantially underestimates leakage, highlighting the need for low-FPR evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T20:57:48Z)
• SynBench: A Benchmark for Differentially Private Text Generation [35.908455649647784]
  Data-driven decision support in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance faces significant barriers to data sharing.<n>Recent generative AI models, such as large language models, have shown impressive performance in open-domain tasks.<n>But their adoption in sensitive environments remains limited by unpredictable behaviors and insufficient privacy-preserving datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T03:57:50Z)
• On the MIA Vulnerability Gap Between Private GANs and Diffusion Models [51.53790101362898]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models have emerged as leading approaches for high-quality image synthesis.<n>We present the first unified theoretical and empirical analysis of the privacy risks faced by differentially private generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:18:22Z)
• SoK: Semantic Privacy in Large Language Models [24.99241770349404]
  This paper introduces a lifecycle-centric framework to analyze semantic privacy risks across input processing, pretraining, fine-tuning, and alignment stages of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We categorize key attack vectors and assess how current defenses, such as differential privacy, embedding encryption, edge computing, and unlearning, address these threats.<n>We conclude by outlining open challenges, including quantifying semantic leakage, protecting multimodal inputs, balancing de-identification with generation quality, and ensuring transparency in privacy enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T08:08:15Z)
• MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation [54.410825977390274]
  Existing benchmarks to evaluate contextual privacy in LLM-agents primarily assess single-turn, low-complexity tasks.<n>We first present a benchmark - MAGPIE comprising 158 real-life high-stakes scenarios across 15 domains.<n>We then evaluate the current state-of-the-art LLMs on their understanding of contextually private data and their ability to collaborate without violating user privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T18:04:25Z)
• REVAL: A Comprehension Evaluation on Reliability and Values of Large Vision-Language Models [59.445672459851274]
  REVAL is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the textbfREliability and textbfVALue of Large Vision-Language Models.<n>REVAL encompasses over 144K image-text Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples, structured into two primary sections: Reliability and Values.<n>We evaluate 26 models, including mainstream open-source LVLMs and prominent closed-source models like GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5-Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T07:54:35Z)
• Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions [11.338466798715906]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance across various domains.<n>This paper provides a comprehensive survey of privacy challenges associated with fine-tuning LLMs.<n>We highlight vulnerabilities to various privacy attacks, including membership inference, data extraction, and backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T06:41:29Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.