Neighbor GRPO: Contrastive ODE Policy Optimization Aligns Flow Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16955v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 05:02:47 GMT
• Title: Neighbor GRPO: Contrastive ODE Policy Optimization Aligns Flow Models
• Authors: Dailan He, Guanlin Feng, Xingtong Ge, Yazhe Niu, Yi Zhang, Bingqi Ma, Guanglu Song, Yu Liu, Hongsheng Li,
• Abstract summary: Group Relative Policy Optimization has shown promise in aligning image and video generative models with human preferences.<n>Applying it to modern flow matching models is challenging because of its deterministic sampling paradigm.<n>We propose Neighbor GRPO, a novel alignment algorithm that completely bypasses the need for SDEs.
• Score: 48.3520220561093
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown promise in aligning image and video generative models with human preferences. However, applying it to modern flow matching models is challenging because of its deterministic sampling paradigm. Current methods address this issue by converting Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) to Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs), which introduce stochasticity. However, this SDE-based GRPO suffers from issues of inefficient credit assignment and incompatibility with high-order solvers for fewer-step sampling. In this paper, we first reinterpret existing SDE-based GRPO methods from a distance optimization perspective, revealing their underlying mechanism as a form of contrastive learning. Based on this insight, we propose Neighbor GRPO, a novel alignment algorithm that completely bypasses the need for SDEs. Neighbor GRPO generates a diverse set of candidate trajectories by perturbing the initial noise conditions of the ODE and optimizes the model using a softmax distance-based surrogate leaping policy. We establish a theoretical connection between this distance-based objective and policy gradient optimization, rigorously integrating our approach into the GRPO framework. Our method fully preserves the advantages of deterministic ODE sampling, including efficiency and compatibility with high-order solvers. We further introduce symmetric anchor sampling for computational efficiency and group-wise quasi-norm reweighting to address reward flattening. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Neighbor GRPO significantly outperforms SDE-based counterparts in terms of training cost, convergence speed, and generation quality.

Related papers

• Multi-Objective Reward and Preference Optimization: Theory and Algorithms [3.316593788543852]
  This thesis develops theoretical frameworks and algorithms that advance constrained reinforcement learning (RL) across control, preference learning, and alignment of large language models.<n>ACPO, e-COP, warmPref-PS, PSPL, and MOPO advance RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms.<n> Collectively, the thesis unifies RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms, delivering theoretical advances and practical tools for safe and aligned decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T12:51:21Z)
• Reinforcing Diffusion Models by Direct Group Preference Optimization [19.195805549362074]
  Group Preference Optimization (DGPO) learns directly from group-level preferences, which utilize relative information of samples within groups.<n>Results show that DGPO trains around 20 times faster than existing state-of-the-art methods and superior performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain metrics reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T16:40:43Z)
• G$^2$RPO: Granular GRPO for Precise Reward in Flow Models [74.21206048155669]
  We propose a novel Granular-GRPO (G$2$RPO) framework that achieves precise and comprehensive reward assessments of sampling directions.<n>We introduce a Multi-Granularity Advantage Integration module that aggregates advantages computed at multiple diffusion scales.<n>Our G$2$RPO significantly outperforms existing flow-based GRPO baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T12:57:12Z)
• Learning to Solve Optimization Problems Constrained with Partial Differential Equations [45.143085119200265]
  Partial equation (PDE)-constrained optimization arises in many scientific and engineering domains.<n>This paper introduces a learning-based framework that integrates a dynamic predictor with an optimization surrogate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T10:28:14Z)
• Optimizing Safe and Aligned Language Generation: A Multi-Objective GRPO Approach [2.8626097661711394]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has achieved notable success in steering models, but is complex and can be unstable.<n>Recent approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify preference-based fine-tuning but may introduce bias or trade-off certain objectives.<n>We propose a Group Relative Policy Optimization framework with a multi-label reward regression model to achieve safe and aligned language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T05:50:33Z)
• RL-finetuning LLMs from on- and off-policy data with a single algorithm [53.70731390624718]
  We introduce a novel reinforcement learning algorithm (AGRO) for fine-tuning large-language models.<n>AGRO leverages the concept of generation consistency, which states that the optimal policy satisfies the notion of consistency across any possible generation of the model.<n>We derive algorithms that find optimal solutions via the sample-based policy gradient and provide theoretical guarantees on their convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T12:52:38Z)
• Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward Inference [15.038210624870656]
  Reward inference is a critical intermediate step in the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback pipeline.<n>This paper develops two RLHF algorithms without reward inference for general RL problems beyond bandits and deterministic MDP bandit, and general preference models beyond the Bradley-Terry model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T22:20:11Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment [93.39181634597877]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data. We show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice. We propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:51:54Z)
• Ensemble Kalman Filtering Meets Gaussian Process SSM for Non-Mean-Field and Online Inference [47.460898983429374]
  We introduce an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) into the non-mean-field (NMF) variational inference framework to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent states. This novel marriage between EnKF and GPSSM not only eliminates the need for extensive parameterization in learning variational distributions, but also enables an interpretable, closed-form approximation of the evidence lower bound (ELBO) We demonstrate that the resulting EnKF-aided online algorithm embodies a principled objective function by ensuring data-fitting accuracy while incorporating model regularizations to mitigate overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T15:22:30Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.