Optimizing Safe and Aligned Language Generation: A Multi-Objective GRPO Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21819v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 05:50:33 GMT
• Title: Optimizing Safe and Aligned Language Generation: A Multi-Objective GRPO Approach
• Authors: Xuying Li, Zhuo Li, Yuji Kosuga, Victor Bian,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has achieved notable success in steering models, but is complex and can be unstable.<n>Recent approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify preference-based fine-tuning but may introduce bias or trade-off certain objectives.<n>We propose a Group Relative Policy Optimization framework with a multi-label reward regression model to achieve safe and aligned language generation.
• Score: 2.8626097661711394
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values and safety constraints is challenging, especially when objectives like helpfulness, truthfulness, and avoidance of harm conflict. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has achieved notable success in steering models, but is complex and can be unstable. Recent approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify preference-based fine-tuning but may introduce bias or trade-off certain objectives~\cite{dpo}. In this work, we propose a Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) framework with a multi-label reward regression model to achieve safe and aligned language generation. The GRPO algorithm optimizes a policy by comparing groups of sampled responses, eliminating the need for a separate value critic and improving training efficiency~\cite{grpo}. We train a reward model to predict multiple alignment scores (e.g., safety, helpfulness, etc.), which are combined into a single reward signal. We provide a theoretical derivation for using this learned multi-aspect reward within GRPO and discuss its advantages and limitations. Empirically, our approach improves all the safety and quality metrics evaluated in language generation tasks on model scales (0.5B, 7B, and 14B parameters), demonstrating a robust balance of objectives. We compare GRPO to PPO-based RLHF and DPO, highlighting that GRPO achieves alignment with significantly lower computational cost and explicit multi-objective handling. \textbf{We will open-source all trained models at https://huggingface.co/hydroxai.

Related papers

• Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models [19.559468441956714]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has emerged as a powerful technique for aligning large language models with human preferences.<n>We frame human value alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem, aiming to maximize a set of potentially conflicting objectives.<n>We introduce Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization (GAPO), a novel fine-tuning paradigm that employs multiple-gradient descent to align LLMs with diverse preference distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:25:26Z)
• DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization [55.06360285372418]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization is a reinforcement learning method for large reasoning models (LRMs)<n>In this work, we analyze the GRPO objective under a binary reward setting and reveal an inherent limitation of question-level difficulty bias.<n>We introduce a new Discriminative Constrained Optimization framework for reinforcing LRMs, grounded in the principle of discriminative learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T11:08:32Z)
• Multi-Objective Preference Optimization: Improving Human Alignment of Generative Models [15.799929216215672]
  We introduce the Multi-Objective Preference Optimization (MOPO) algorithm, which frames alignment as a constrained KL-regularized optimization.<n>Unlike prior work, MOPO operates directly on pairwise preference data, requires no point-wise reward assumption, and avoids prompt-context engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T05:58:26Z)
• Kalman Filter Enhanced GRPO for Reinforcement Learning-Based Language Model Reasoning [11.708197376569016]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization ( GRPO) is proposed to compute the advantage for each output by subtracting the mean reward, as the baseline, for all outputs in the group.<n>It can lead to inaccurate advantage estimates in environments with highly noisy rewards, potentially introducing bias.<n>We propose a model, called Kalman Filter Enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization (KRPO), by using lightweight Kalman filtering to dynamically estimate the latent reward mean and variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T13:09:49Z)
• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models. Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining. We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• MPO: An Efficient Post-Processing Framework for Mixing Diverse Preference Alignment [14.541973333460149]
  Mixing Preference Optimization (MPO) is a post-processing framework for aggregating single-objective policies.<n>MPO achieves balanced performance across diverse preferences, outperforming existing models with significantly reduced computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:22:12Z)
• Lean and Mean: Decoupled Value Policy Optimization with Global Value Guidance [52.65461207786633]
  Policy-based Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is essential for aligning large language models with human preferences. It requires joint training of an actor and critic with a pretrained, fixed reward model for guidance. We propose textbfDecoupled Value Policy Optimization (DVPO), a lean framework that replaces traditional reward modeling with a pretrained emphglobal value model (GVM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T08:11:33Z)
• GDPO: Learning to Directly Align Language Models with Diversity Using GFlowNets [19.485572131953937]
  We propose a practical application of a diversity-seeking RL algorithm called GFlowNet-DPO (GDPO) in an offline preference alignment setting. Empirical results show GDPO can generate far more diverse responses than the baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T13:07:52Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC. We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications. We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment [58.049113055986375]
  We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.<n>The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.<n>We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
• Group Robust Preference Optimization in Reward-free RLHF [23.622835830345725]
  We propose a novel Group Robust Preference Optimization (GRPO) method to align large language models to individual groups' preferences robustly. To achieve this, GRPO adaptively and sequentially weights the importance of different groups, prioritizing groups with worse cumulative loss. We significantly improved performance for the worst-performing groups, reduced loss imbalances across groups, and improved probability accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:50:04Z)
• Token-level Direct Preference Optimization [8.249403373337024]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models is essential to align them with human values and intentions. We introduce Token-level Direct Preference Optimization (TDPO), a novel approach to align LLMs with human preferences by optimizing policy at the token level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T08:49:38Z)
• MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferences [101.57443597426374]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models to human preferences by employing a singular reward model derived from preference data. We learn a mixture of preference distributions via an expectation-maximization algorithm to better represent diverse human preferences. Our algorithm achieves an average improvement of more than 16% in win-rates over conventional RLHF algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:56:27Z)
• Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
  Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence. reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit. In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model [119.65409513119963]
  We introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T17:57:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.