What Drives Cross-lingual Ranking? Retrieval Approaches with Multilingual Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19324v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:17:40 GMT
• Title: What Drives Cross-lingual Ranking? Retrieval Approaches with Multilingual Language Models
• Authors: Roksana Goworek, Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Eda B. Özyiğit,
• Abstract summary: Cross-lingual information retrieval is challenging due to disparities in resources, scripts, and weak cross-lingual semantic alignment in embedding models.<n>Existing pipelines often rely on translation and monolingual retrievals, which add computational overhead and noise, performance.<n>This work systematically evaluates four intervention types, namely document translation, multilingual dense retrieval with pretrained encoders, contrastive learning at word, phrase, and query-document levels, and cross-encoder re-ranking, across three benchmark datasets.
• Score: 0.19116784879310025
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cross-lingual information retrieval (CLIR) enables access to multilingual knowledge but remains challenging due to disparities in resources, scripts, and weak cross-lingual semantic alignment in embedding models. Existing pipelines often rely on translation and monolingual retrieval heuristics, which add computational overhead and noise, degrading performance. This work systematically evaluates four intervention types, namely document translation, multilingual dense retrieval with pretrained encoders, contrastive learning at word, phrase, and query-document levels, and cross-encoder re-ranking, across three benchmark datasets. We find that dense retrieval models trained specifically for CLIR consistently outperform lexical matching methods and derive little benefit from document translation. Contrastive learning mitigates language biases and yields substantial improvements for encoders with weak initial alignment, and re-ranking can be effective, but depends on the quality of the cross-encoder training data. Although high-resource languages still dominate overall performance, gains over lexical and document-translated baselines are most pronounced for low-resource and cross-script pairs. These findings indicate that cross-lingual search systems should prioritise semantic multilingual embeddings and targeted learning-based alignment over translation-based pipelines, particularly for cross-script and under-resourced languages.

Related papers

• What Language is This? Ask Your Tokenizer [32.28976119949841]
  Language Identification (LID) is an important component of many multilingual natural language processing pipelines.<n>We introduce UniLID, a simple and efficient LID method based on the UnigramLM tokenization algorithm.<n>Our formulation is data- and compute-efficient, supports incremental addition of new languages without retraining existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:58:39Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)
• T3L: Translate-and-Test Transfer Learning for Cross-Lingual Text Classification [50.675552118811]
  Cross-lingual text classification is typically built on large-scale, multilingual language models (LMs) pretrained on a variety of languages of interest. We propose revisiting the classic "translate-and-test" pipeline to neatly separate the translation and classification stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:33:22Z)
• Soft Prompt Decoding for Multilingual Dense Retrieval [30.766917713997355]
  We show that applying state-of-the-art approaches developed for cross-lingual information retrieval to MLIR tasks leads to sub-optimal performance. This is due to the heterogeneous and imbalanced nature of multilingual collections. We present KD-SPD, a novel soft prompt decoding approach for MLIR that implicitly "translates" the representation of documents in different languages into the same embedding space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T21:17:17Z)
• Improving Cross-lingual Information Retrieval on Low-Resource Languages via Optimal Transport Distillation [21.057178077747754]
  In this work, we propose OPTICAL: Optimal Transport distillation for low-resource Cross-lingual information retrieval. By separating the cross-lingual knowledge from knowledge of query document matching, OPTICAL only needs bitext data for distillation training. Experimental results show that, with minimal training data, OPTICAL significantly outperforms strong baselines on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-29T22:30:36Z)
• Progressive Sentiment Analysis for Code-Switched Text Data [26.71396390928905]
  We focus on code-switched sentiment analysis where we have a labelled resource-rich language dataset and unlabelled code-switched data. We propose a framework that takes the distinction between resource-rich and low-resource language into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T23:13:53Z)
• Exposing Cross-Lingual Lexical Knowledge from Multilingual Sentence Encoders [85.80950708769923]
  We probe multilingual language models for the amount of cross-lingual lexical knowledge stored in their parameters, and compare them against the original multilingual LMs. We also devise a novel method to expose this knowledge by additionally fine-tuning multilingual models. We report substantial gains on standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T13:23:16Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• Cross-lingual Text Classification with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network [2.6936806968297913]
  Cross-lingual text classification aims at training a classifier on the source language and transferring the knowledge to target languages. Recent multilingual pretrained language models (mPLM) achieve impressive results in cross-lingual classification tasks. We propose a simple yet effective method to incorporate heterogeneous information within and across languages for cross-lingual text classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T12:45:42Z)
• Evaluating Multilingual Text Encoders for Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Retrieval [51.60862829942932]
  We present a systematic empirical study focused on the suitability of the state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. For sentence-level CLIR, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art performance can be achieved. However, the peak performance is not met using the general-purpose multilingual text encoders off-the-shelf', but rather relying on their variants that have been further specialized for sentence understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T00:15:38Z)
• FILTER: An Enhanced Fusion Method for Cross-lingual Language Understanding [85.29270319872597]
  We propose an enhanced fusion method that takes cross-lingual data as input for XLM finetuning. During inference, the model makes predictions based on the text input in the target language and its translation in the source language. To tackle this issue, we propose an additional KL-divergence self-teaching loss for model training, based on auto-generated soft pseudo-labels for translated text in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T22:42:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.