ART: Adaptive Response Tuning Framework -- A Multi-Agent Tournament-Based Approach to LLM Response Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00617v1
• Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 20:16:11 GMT
• Title: ART: Adaptive Response Tuning Framework -- A Multi-Agent Tournament-Based Approach to LLM Response Optimization
• Authors: Omer Jauhar Khan,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation.<n>This paper presents ART (Adaptive Response Tuning), a novel framework that employs tournament-style ELO ranking and multi-agent reasoning.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, single-model responses often exhibit inconsistencies, hallucinations, and varying quality across different query domains. This paper presents ART (Adaptive Response Tuning), a novel framework that employs tournament-style ELO ranking and multi-agent reasoning to systematically optimize LLM outputs. By enabling multiple LLM agents to compete, critique, and collaborate through structured tournament workflows, ART produces consensus responses that outperform individual model outputs. Our framework introduces configurable tournament parameters, dynamic agent selection, and multiple consensus fusion strategies. Experimental evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in response accuracy, coherence, and reliability compared to baseline single-model approaches. The ART framework provides a scalable, production-ready solution for applications requiring high-quality, vetted LLM responses, achieving an 8.4% improvement in overall quality metrics and R22 values exceeding 0.96 in ELO rating convergence.

Related papers

• Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process [58.265053900416895]
  LLM-PeerReview is built on a novel, peer-review-inspired framework.<n>It operates in three stages: For scoring, we use the emerging LLM-as-a-Judge technique.<n>For reasoning, we can apply a graphical model-based truth inference algorithm.<n>Finally, the highest-scoring response is selected as the best ensemble output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T05:25:49Z)
• Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration Achieves Deterministic, High-Quality Decision Support for Incident Response [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) promise to accelerate incident response in production systems.<n>Yet single-agent approaches generate vague, unusable recommendations.<n>We present MyAntFarm.ai, a containerized framework demonstrating that multi-agent orchestration transforms incident response quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T06:06:11Z)
• Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information [57.397381631496906]
  We develop two new aggregation algorithms called Optimal Weight (OW) and Inverse Surprising Popularity (ISP)<n>Our theoretical analysis shows these methods provably mitigate inherent limitations of majority voting under mild assumptions.<n>We empirically validate our algorithms on synthetic datasets, popular LLM fine-tuning benchmarks such as UltraFeedback and MMLU, and a real-world healthcare setting ARMMAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T22:21:50Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Answer Selection for Improved Reasoning in Multi-LLM Systems [55.6590601898194]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities, yet selecting the most reliable response from multiple LLMs remains a challenge.<n>Existing approaches often depend on costly external verifiers, human evaluators, or self-consistency techniques that require multiple samples from a single model.<n>We propose a principled, novel and computationally efficient method to select the best response from multiple different LLMs using a calibrated log-likelihood score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T01:25:19Z)
• StepORLM: A Self-Evolving Framework With Generative Process Supervision For Operations Research Language Models [18.500046072165254]
  We introduce StepORLM, a novel self-evolving framework with generative process supervision.<n>At its core, StepORLM features a co-evolutionary loop where a policy model and a generative process reward model (GenPRM) iteratively improve on each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:39:10Z)
• Learning to Refine: Self-Refinement of Parallel Reasoning in LLMs [102.48588475875749]
  We introduce Generative Self-Refinement (GSR), a novel parallel test-time scaling framework.<n>GSR generates a set of candidate responses in parallel and then performs self-refinement to synthesize a new superior solution.<n>We show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across five mathematical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T06:51:48Z)
• RLAE: Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Ensemble for LLMs [21.77261258691006]
  Large language models (LLMs) can effectively combine diverse strengths of different models, offering a promising approach to enhance performance across various tasks.<n>We propose Reinforcement Learning-Assisted Ensemble for LLMs, a novel framework that reformulates ensemble through the lens of a Markov Decision Process (MDP)<n>Our approach introduces a RL agent that dynamically adjusts ensemble weights by considering both input context and intermediate generation states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T07:38:41Z)
• Multiple Weaks Win Single Strong: Large Language Models Ensemble Weak Reinforcement Learning Agents into a Supreme One [28.264011412168347]
  Model ensemble is a useful approach in reinforcement learning (RL) for training effective agents.<n>We propose LLM-Ens, a novel approach that enhances RL model ensemble with task-specific semantic understandings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T09:35:43Z)
• Direct Retrieval-augmented Optimization: Synergizing Knowledge Selection and Language Models [83.8639566087953]
  We propose a direct retrieval-augmented optimization framework, named DRO, that enables end-to-end training of two key components.<n>DRO alternates between two phases: (i) document permutation estimation and (ii) re-weighted, progressively improving RAG components.<n>Our theoretical analysis reveals that DRO is analogous to policy-gradient methods in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T23:54:53Z)
• Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z)
• Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
  We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets. The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method. The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z)
• CoEvol: Constructing Better Responses for Instruction Finetuning through Multi-Agent Cooperation [33.33513657902765]
  We propose CoEvol, an LLM-based multi-agent cooperation framework for the improvement of responses to instructions. Empirically, models equipped with CoEvol outperform competitive baselines evaluated by MT-Bench and AlpacaEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T08:35:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.